Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Food & Think

A heaping helping of food news, science and culture

Off the Road

The travel adventures of a nomad on the cheap


August 31, 2012

Wolves Are Returning to Oregon–but Not All Locals Want Them

An Oregon wolf looks straight into the lens of a photographer. The animals have returned to eastern Oregon and are spreading through the state. Photo courtesy of Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

In 1947, the last wolf in Oregon was shot and killed for a bounty fee of $5 in the wilderness near Crater Lake.

Now, after more than 50 years of absence, the animals are staging a comeback. They have established themselves in the eastern quarters of the state and are subsisting on local elk and deer herds–and, as might be expected, the occasional cow and sheep. Also quite predictably, the return to Oregon of one of the world’s most maligned and persecuted predators has Oregonians passionately polarized on the matter, with many people fully in support and others adamantly opposed to the animals’ reappearance. Livestock ranchers have led the campaign to stop the return, which is occurring naturally–although only as a result of the 1995 reintroduction of Canadian gray wolves to the Yellowstone National Park region, in Wyoming, Montana and Idaho. Those animals have thrived and flourished, and experts expect that the same could happen in Oregon.

The first wolf to return to Oregon in modern times entered the state from Idaho in 1999. The animal, known as B-45F to researchers, was trapped and sent home to Idaho by wildlife officials, however. Subsequently, two other wolves were hit and killed by cars in Oregon, and one was shot by a poacher, according to Sean Stevens, executive director of the wildlife and natural space advocacy group Oregon Wild, who recently spoke with me by telephone. But in 2007, an animal wearing a remote tracking collar and named B-300 by researchers, who had tranquilized and handled it in Idaho, entered Oregon. Here, it put down roots, and in the summer of 2009, officials with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife confirmed the presence of three adult wolves and three pups in Wallowa County–the first wolf pack in Oregon in about six decades.

Wolf “B300″ was the first to enter Oregon ans remain there. The wolf would form a pack and has since produced multiple pups. Photo courtesy of Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Now, at least 30 wolves in five packs live in Oregon, according to Michelle Dennehy, communications officer with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

“We want confirmation of two pups for an adult pair before we consider it a pack breeding pair,” she said. “By now, all five packs have produced multiple pups.”

Dennehy says that the Department of Fish and Wildlife has confirmed 54 head of Oregon livestock killed by wolves as of July, with most kills being cattle, a few sheep and one a goat. Several wolves have been legally killed, she said, as a result of habitual depredations on livestock, and Dennehy says that the state of Oregon, along with Defenders of Wildlife, have joined resources to reimburse farmers who have suffered losses. The state’s Department of Agriculture has allocated a reimbursement fund, too.

Even before the first modern-times wolf moved permanently into Oregon, officials foresaw the potential for the species’ return and the problems the wolves might cause. And so the Oregon Wolf Conservation and Management Plan [PDF] was enacted in 2005 by the state of Oregon with the intention of readying the state and its people for the presence once again of the gray wolf. The wolf plan outlines just how to respond to wolves that prey upon livestock and at what point Oregon wolves might be removed from the state’s endangered species list as their numbers grow, among other issues of question. Ranchers, hunters, hikers, conservationists, government land managers and other stakeholders took part in developing the wolf plan, Dennehy said.

According to Stevens at Oregon Wild, roughly 1,000 wolves could probably live in Oregon’s vast wild spaces, mostly in the arid eastern half of the state. Ranchers of cows and sheep are hardly thrilled at the idea, however. They have already helped write and introduce multiple legislative efforts to block the wolves’ return–one a proposal that, had it become law, would have allowed a person to shoot a wolf onsite if he or she deemed the animal to be a threat.

It would have also done something else controversial. “It would have taken the management of an endangered species out of the hands of government and given it to private citizens,” Stevens said.

It was the Oregon Cattlemen’s Association that introduced that proposed law. This year, the same group introduced another effort to rid the state of wolves–a piece of legislation calling for a state of emergency in eastern Oregon because of the wolves’ presence. Both proposals were rejected by lawmakers.

More than 1 million cows live in the state, according to Stevens. In 2010, he says, 55,000 of those cows died prior to entering the slaughterhouse of disease, nasty weather and other non-wolf causes.

But Rod Childers, the Oregon Cattlemen’s Association’s Wolf Committee Chairman, says that ranchers are suffering far greater financial losses because of wolves than have been conveyed to most media. Childers, who raises cattle in Wallowa County, says that for every dead cow or sheep confirmed as a victim of wolves, several more wolf kills go unconfirmed, due either to inconclusive evidence or the entire lack of a carcass. That is, some animals simply go missing–and they’re doing so at about double the rate that they once did. Childers says he is certain that the wolves are involved.

“Because nothing’s changed but the wolves,” he explained. “We’ve always had cougars, bears, coyotes. But now wolves are here, and our losses are up.”

Childers says that in Wallowa County, 26 head of cattle have been confirmed as killed by wolves. But 86 other animals have disappeared–almost certainly, he says, killed by wolves.

And the reimbursement plan is not a fair deal, Childers says, because it only provides payment for confirmed wolf depredations. Childers also points out a more subtle loss that he and other ranchers are enduring: Their animals have been returning from their high country summer pastures thinner than they once did–a result, he explains, of being continually harassed and attacked by wolves. Such underweight animals bring ranchers less profits than properly fattened cows might.

“But that’s not accounted for in the wolf plan,” he says.

While tempers flare and the occasional bullet flies at a wolf, the biggest wild canine is still expanding its range. Now, as officials and others expect continued growth in the wolf population, another question arises: How far will the wolf go? In fact, one wolf, a collared animal named OR-7, became the first wolf to go west of the Cascades since the bounty days—and eventually entered California. The animal has been nicknamed “Journey,” and the California Department of Fish and Game is tracking and publicizing the animal’s approximate whereabouts via the Internet.

The wolf situation in Oregon is extraordinary because the animals are coming back on their own–a rare example of a large predator actually expanding its range instead of, as is the more common pattern, diminishing ever closer to extinction. Moreover, the fact that their swelling population has spilled into Oregon’s more vacant regions indicates that, aside from a few conflicts with livestock, there may be room for the animals.

Today, wolf tourism could be a new draw for visitors to wolf country. Oregon Wild has led tours to eastern Oregon each of the past three years to show groups of about 10 people the state’s wolf habitat—and to meet the ranchers who believe their livelihoods may be imperiled by the animals. Check the organization’s website to learn more.

Size matters. Some wolf opponents are arguing that the wolves now recolonizing Oregon are larger than those wiped out last century. If true, this would be more than just interesting. It would also mean that the animals need more food and are more capable of taking down large head of livestock. While it may be true that the wolves of Oregon today are of different genetic roots than those that inhabited the state in the past, scientists and experts have denied that they are substantially larger.

What do you think? If wolves want back in to Oregon and California, should we welcome them?

 



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

10 Comments »

  1. Jack1wolfhybrid says:

    Wolves have as much a right to live as we do.
    We may not like rattlesnakes or mountaIn
    lions either but they are part of our ecosystem.
    The U.S. government spent thousands to
    re-introduce the wolf here. Now ranchers that
    keep their cattle on our public lands want
    to kill them all.

  2. Kathy says:

    I hestitate to give my opinion since I don’t live in Oregon. I can sympathize to a point with the ranchers, but I also see it as a cost of doing business, just like farmers have to contend with drought,disease, bugs, and birds. Should we eradicate or strictly restrain every living thing thats costs us money? I don’t think so. The wolves have a natural right to fight for survival and to thrive where ever possible. Maybe, we need to consider altering our behaviors.

  3. Victoria says:

    I do live in Oregon, so I guess that gives me the right to comment. This article is pretty pro-wolf. These wolves ARE larger than those that were native to Oregon, and they ARE disrupting the ecosystem. They are literally wiping out the deer and elk herds all over the west(and not just for food… they LOVE to hunt and kill, so they do it whether they are hungry or not), and when those are gone, gone, they will do the same to our domestic herds. Then what will YOU eat? Aren’t you tired of the government spending so much money on killers, instead of on REAL affordable health care? Some people say they used to be here, so they should be. I ask “why?” There’s absolutely nothing in the Bible or nature that says an animal “deserves” to exist, just because.

  4. Andrew says:

    Victoria – you bring up an interesting point. What will we eat when the wolves start preying on our domestic herds? Maybe a more vegetarian diet. Clearly the vast herds of cattle raised on our public lands are the number one barrier to the reestablishment of wolves. Perhaps we don’t need so many cattle.

    Let animals that NEED to eat meat eat meat while we humans can make educated choices concerning our diets.

  5. Santia says:

    If I came and took over your home and wiped out your family, what would you do? So many humans could care less about “lesser” animals – humans hardly care for other humans. The feeling of entitlement many humans have is absolutely disgusting.
    The wolves were here first and as humans, a so-called “enlightened” species, we should have respect for that. But, no. Greed and entitlement. That’s a human for you.
    Wolves are trying to survive a holocaust that humans caused. Face it – wolves are the ones worth saving, not humans.

  6. MW says:

    Victoria: It seems the only thing you know about wolves is your intense and undeserved hatred for them. I must inform you that the only creatures who hunt and kill for FUN are humans. Not wolves. Wolves burn up a tremendous amount of energy because they travel so much. Therefore, they must hunt and kill in order to eat and keep up their strength. Wolves EAT everything they kill; bones, fur and all. It may take them a few weeks depending on how big the kill was, but they will return to the same kill and feed off of it until it’s gone and they need to hunt again. Wolves often seize the opportunity to kill more than one animal per hunt, usually sheep or cattle that are free-ranged on the wolves’ territory. Because cattle and sheep are domestic, they usually don’t run away when one of their kind is being killed; instead, they watch in curiosity, which enables the wolves to grab another once the first animal is dead. Wild animals such as elk and deer know to run as far away from the predator as possible; sheep and cows lack this instinct. If the wolves do come across an opportunity to kill in excess, they will, but they will also return to their prey if given the chance to feed from it when the first kill is gone. The wolves are doing what is natural, and they do what they must to survive. Wolves kill to feed their families. Humans kill for pleasure. Maybe if the cattle ranchers stopped grazing their livestock on wolf territory, the wolves wouldn’t bother the livestock. Wolves are extremely shy and nervous animals who do everything in their power to stay away from humans. Keep your animals on your OWN property and the wolves won’t eat them. Get a livestock guardian dog to raise with your livestock to protect them. There are so many ways to prevent your livestock from being killed by predators that don’t involve going on an unnecessary killing spree. Cattle ranchers don’t kill wolves because they are threatened by them; they kill wolves because humans LOVE killing. So, Victoria, perhaps you should do a little more research before condemning an innocent creature whose only interest is to provide for its family. The cattleman kills to keep his pocket lined with money and to show how macho he is. Who’s the real murderer in all of this, I wonder?

  7. Emma21 says:

    Dear MW,
    Do you even know what a cow looks like??? Have you ever worked for ten hours a day, every weekend, to make sure your cattle were in the right place? Or that they had enough water, feed up in the hills they graze on, a salt block? Do you know the time and effort my family and local ranchers/farmers put into making YOUR DINNER?! Doesn’t matter if you are a vegaterian, but the REST OF AMERICA is eating what I raise EVERY DAY! It’s not about eating though. What are your shoes made of? Listen to this…. I put my cattle on my land,my own land,thats over 7,000 acres, and there is only a fence between my cattle, and a wolf. Apparently wolves have gone to school and learned to read, because I can guarentee a fence with a trespassing sign isnt going to stop a wolf from crossing, and attacking my herd. I dont understand were you come off. You are saying if we keep our cattle on our own acres, that the wolves will stay off of it? Do you understand how ridiculous that sounds? Apparently you also have taken a field trip into the mind of a wolf, to learn what they think… I dont have a problem with them being in Oregon if they dont distrub our crops. They should be taken care of, if they do. Also who are you to say that they have a right to be here. You have many misconceptions about the way ranchers operate. You are on the side of the wolf, and not the side of your fellow humans. So maybe you should do a little more research yourself, and realize that the majority of people dont want them to disturb OUR livestock. We care about animals and want to protect them. Just as you would care and protect your own family. We would like to protect out livlihood and preserve the livability of our culture.

    When someone is in New York, they have a problem with cars. they think they are so bad for the environment which i wont argue… BUT! just because you dont need it, doesnt mean that the REST OF AMERICA doesnt??? what im saying is stop forcing things down peoples throats. i like the city alot! the easy way to get things and what not. BUT! who are you to say what a rancher goes through???

    I dont think a wolf has the RIGHT to live here. They were here originaly, before us, so i think they can be here. We should deffinatly be able to address the problems if the need arises. I dont know about you, but i would really like eat tonite?? We donate cattle to our local schools as do other cattlemen, not to be macho but so that they can eat… Eat that. Let’s introduce wolves into Central Park…seems like that would be ok right?

    I love anumals. So much!:) They should be treated humainly… All of them should!

  8. David says:

    chaining do live in Oregon and believe a rancher should be allowed to kill a wolf if it is found on his/her property!

  9. robert says:

    Why not say that the reimbursement program for wolf kills is a good start to help ranchers. But we shouldn’t forget either that many ranchers are using public lands; that is to say, the lands belong to the American public when they do so, and this form of government welfare should be seen in balance with rancher demands. The American public at large should havee at least as much say as ranchers on, let’s face it, a form of taxpayer government dole.

  10. Mike says:

    I do support a rancher to be able to make a living and to do so within fairness to Mother Nature on and around his land. I like the program of ranchers being reimbursed for wolf kills though it’s true it’s part of business. At same time I’m also a lifelong advocate of wolves and wish them a return from man’s doing. The wolf and a great many other creatures, once we lose them, they aren’t coming back in my lifetime. Maybe someday they could come back through DNA but that’s probably still 50-100 years away from what I just read. I absolutely emphasize for the ranchers and yes I’ve lived and worked on one. But, I want us to find a way for the wolf’s safe return also. Yes, that’s really a walking the fence opinion, no pun intended.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement