February 22, 2012
A Piece of Email History Comes to the American History Museum
![]()
In the summer of 1979, a 14-year-old high school student named Shiva Ayyadurai was given an unusual project. As part of his part-time work for the College of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, he received a request from Dr. Lesley Michelson, who managed the computer lab: write a special program for the school’s doctors and other staff to use to communicate. “He said, ‘Shiva, we have this interoffice mail system, but I think we could create an electronic mail system,’” Ayyadurai, who is a visiting lecturer now a professor at MIT, recalls. “I had no idea what he was saying. I thought he literally meant sending electricity through paper.”
Ayyadurai spent the next few months writing a groundbreaking program he simply titled “Email.” Although previous computer networks had the capacity to send information between terminals, “Email” was one of the first to include a number of features we now take for granted: subject and body fields, inboxes, outboxes, cc, bcc, attachments, and others. He based these elements directly off of the interoffice mail memos the doctors had been using for years, in hopes of convincing people to actually use the newfangled technology.
More than 30 years later, email is now an irreplaceable part of modern digital life, and Ayyadurai has donated a trove of documents and code to the American History Museum to preserve his place in history. The donation, which occurred last week, included both a printout and tapes containing the program’s original Fortran code, the copyright he took out on the program and user manual, a presentation he gave to doctors and other staff at the College to explain the new program and other materials.
Peggy Kidwell, a curator at the museum who focuses on the history of science, mathematics and technology, says the artifacts show how much information technology has changed in the years since Ayyadurai’s early creation. “If you were to tell some information technology office today that they were going to have a high school student come in and set up their email program, it’d blow their minds,” she says. “But this is a really fascinating early example of how computers were changing communication.”
Update: In a statement, the American History Museum clarified the significance of Ayyadurai’s donation. “Exchanging messages through computer systems, what most people call “email,” predates the work of Ayyadurai,” the statement says. However, the museum determined that “Ayyadurai’s materials served as signposts to several stories about the American experience.” Read the full statement.
Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.
6 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
























Creating an internet mail system at age 14 is impressive. Making it simple enough that academics will use it is genius.
(In case my email did not make it to you)
The citation text:
“…first to include a number of features we now take for granted: subject and body fields, inboxes, outboxes, cc, bcc, attachments…”
All of the above assertions are factually incorrect and easily disproved. There has been enough public reaction to these inaccuracies to render any further recitation here entirely redundant, but I do recommend you reconsider how you are handling this material.
It was impressive work for a 14-year old, but each component of it had already been done by others, 1-10 years earlier.
/Dave Crocker
(One the the various folk who did the work earlier…)
This article is misleading and inaccurate. How did it manage to get published?
Maybe this fellow Ayyadurai copyrighted an email program in 1978. So what? Nobody ever heard of it! He most certainly did NOT invent the To: CC: BCC: Subject and other header fields used in email. See RFC 733: http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc733.txt (21 Nov 1977).
The first generally used email program for message transport from one system to another was created by Ray Tomlinson in 1971 based on two existing programs, SNDMSG and CPYNET. For a good list of prior art in this field, please see http://www.livinginternet.com/e/ei.htm
Note the lede of the wikipedia article on this gentleman:
V. A. Shiva Ayyadurai (born December 2, 1963 in Tamil Nadu, India) is an American storyteller, inventor, scientist, and Faculty Lecturer in Department of Biological Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.[1] He is known for falsely claiming to have invented email (or “EMAIL”) in 1978
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva_Ayyadurai
sincerely,
Henry Edward Hardy
systems administrator
Author of, “The History of the Net”
VA Shiva did not invent electronic mail. He only invented a system called “EMAIL” (all uppercase) in 1982, years after the implementation of such systems in the ARPANET and in every Unix system for example.
See following clarification from the National Museum of American History (Smithsonian) about the materials it collected from V.A. Shiva Ayyudurai (dated 02/24/2012:
http://americanhistory.si.edu/news/pressrelease.cfm?key=29&newskey=1465
And see the wikipedia’s page that gives all details and pointers about V.A. Shiva’s imposture:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva_Ayyadurai
It seems to me that Smithsonian made an unintentional mistake and now they are naturally trying to justify it with other finer explanations. Emal is email whether it is implemented over the ARPAnet or in a small office setting, the underlying events and its basic idea and utility are the same. Also, whether it is implemented in a medical setting or in a legal setting does not make any difference, the content is immaterial. Bringing the Courant experience is not directly relevant to the subject here – it is just a parenthetical history. Mainframes like IBM 1620 was available way before 1978 in many places and interested students were able to learn FORTRAN and computing well before that time. So, I do not see any of those reasons as important. Also in the blog above, he is represented as a professor. He is not, he is a lecturer and for Smithsonian to say otherwise would diminish its credibility, when MIT had made a correction on that (http://tech.mit.edu/V131/N60/emaillab.html ).
I suspect this collection will eventually go into some obscure place in Smithsonian after everything is said and done.
Why has the retraction of this article, linked below the main text, been deleted?
http://americanhistory.si.edu/news/pressrelease.cfm?key=29&newskey=1465