<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Smithsonian Expert Breaks Down the Science of Meteors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/aroundthemall/2013/02/a-smithsonian-expert-breaks-down-the-science-of-meteors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/aroundthemall/2013/02/a-smithsonian-expert-breaks-down-the-science-of-meteors/</link>
	<description>A new Smithsonian blog covering scenes and sightings from the Smithsonian museums and beyond.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:14:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Coster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/aroundthemall/2013/02/a-smithsonian-expert-breaks-down-the-science-of-meteors/comment-page-1/#comment-10186</link>
		<dc:creator>James Coster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/aroundthemall/?p=34107#comment-10186</guid>
		<description>News people report that a &quot;sonic boom&quot; is what was felt and what caused the destruction. My understanding is that it was the explosion of superheated gases when the meteor impacted the atmosphere at some 40,000 mph that was experienced. Sonic booms, per se, occur when objects accelerate through the speed of sound (~760mph). While there may have been a sonic boom component as the meteor, and its fragments, slowed in the atmosphere, that would be minimal compared to the explosion caused by impact. Can anyone verify or refute this line of thinking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News people report that a &#8220;sonic boom&#8221; is what was felt and what caused the destruction. My understanding is that it was the explosion of superheated gases when the meteor impacted the atmosphere at some 40,000 mph that was experienced. Sonic booms, per se, occur when objects accelerate through the speed of sound (~760mph). While there may have been a sonic boom component as the meteor, and its fragments, slowed in the atmosphere, that would be minimal compared to the explosion caused by impact. Can anyone verify or refute this line of thinking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas L Vaultonburg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/aroundthemall/2013/02/a-smithsonian-expert-breaks-down-the-science-of-meteors/comment-page-1/#comment-10175</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas L Vaultonburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 02:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/aroundthemall/?p=34107#comment-10175</guid>
		<description>Maybe this will get Congress to start taking funding of NASA seriously. http://www.chetretorted.com/2013/02/the-meteor-melted-edward-james-olmos.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this will get Congress to start taking funding of NASA seriously. <a href="http://www.chetretorted.com/2013/02/the-meteor-melted-edward-james-olmos.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.chetretorted.com/2013/02/the-meteor-melted-edward-james-olmos.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
