<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Case for a New Grant Wood Painting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/art/2012/03/the-case-for-a-new-grant-wood-painting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/art/2012/03/the-case-for-a-new-grant-wood-painting/</link>
	<description>An impassioned view of what&#039;s worth looking at</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 21:58:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Audrey Burtrum-Stanley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/art/2012/03/the-case-for-a-new-grant-wood-painting/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Audrey Burtrum-Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 04:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/art/?p=168#comment-108</guid>
		<description>I am a huge fan of GRANT WOOD. This piece - if it is indeed UNFINISHED lacks his smooth roundness; indeed, he made all of Iowa look like there was nary a sharp edge anywhere!

I do not like the reflective water - it seems too impressionistic; the clouds are poorly composed;
even the fields with corn and hay are not executed well...
However, the detail of canvas and paint applications are very interesting.

I believe it might have been a work in progress.

I do know, from extensive reading and having visited with Nan (his sister), Grant Wood did delightful, memorable  pranks and &#039;humor was a serious part of his life!&#039;

Good Luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a huge fan of GRANT WOOD. This piece &#8211; if it is indeed UNFINISHED lacks his smooth roundness; indeed, he made all of Iowa look like there was nary a sharp edge anywhere!</p>
<p>I do not like the reflective water &#8211; it seems too impressionistic; the clouds are poorly composed;<br />
even the fields with corn and hay are not executed well&#8230;<br />
However, the detail of canvas and paint applications are very interesting.</p>
<p>I believe it might have been a work in progress.</p>
<p>I do know, from extensive reading and having visited with Nan (his sister), Grant Wood did delightful, memorable  pranks and &#8216;humor was a serious part of his life!&#8217;</p>
<p>Good Luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee Reader</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/art/2012/03/the-case-for-a-new-grant-wood-painting/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 18:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/art/?p=168#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Did the bigfoot prints have 8 toes? 
TBH I thought those shrub &quot;toes&quot; were rows of orchard trees, perhaps farther away. The perspective seems odd. However, I do like the soft rolling roundness of the landscape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the bigfoot prints have 8 toes?<br />
TBH I thought those shrub &#8220;toes&#8221; were rows of orchard trees, perhaps farther away. The perspective seems odd. However, I do like the soft rolling roundness of the landscape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/art/2012/03/the-case-for-a-new-grant-wood-painting/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/art/?p=168#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Seems obvious to even a casual observer that this can&#039;t be by Grant Wood - it doesn&#039;t even come close to the clean lines and fine polish of his later works. Could be someone did this in the style of Wood, and presented it to him as a gift. I wouldn&#039;t look at this and think &quot;Grant Wood&quot; - I&#039;d look at this and think &quot;High School Art Class&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems obvious to even a casual observer that this can&#8217;t be by Grant Wood &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t even come close to the clean lines and fine polish of his later works. Could be someone did this in the style of Wood, and presented it to him as a gift. I wouldn&#8217;t look at this and think &#8220;Grant Wood&#8221; &#8211; I&#8217;d look at this and think &#8220;High School Art Class&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
