Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Collage of Arts & Sciences

Where the studio meets the research lab

Design Decoded

Sketching the blueprints behind everyday things

threaded

Your go-to fashion blog for all things historical and sartorial

Retina

The Best Visuals from Smithsonian and the Web


February 7, 2013

The Unsettling Beauty of Lethal Pathogens

E. coli, by Luke Jerram.

Few non-scientists would be able to distinguish the E. coli virus bacteria from the HIV virus under a microscope. Artist Luke Jerram, however, can describe in intricate detail the shapes of a slew of deadly viruses pathogens. He is intrigued by them, as a subject matter, because of their inherent irony. That is, something as virulent as SARS can actually, in its physical form, be quite delicate.

Clearly adept at scientific work—as an undergraduate, the Brit was offered a spot on a university engineering program—Jerram chose to pursue art instead. “Scientists and artists start by asking similar questions about the natural world,” he told SEED magazine in a 2009 interview. “They just end up with completely different answers.”

HIV (series 2), by Luke Jerram.

To create a body of work he calls “Glass Microbiology,” Jerram has enlisted the help of virologist Andrew Davidson from the University of Bristol and the expertise of professional glassblowers Kim George, Brian George and Norman Veitch. Together, the cross-disciplinary team brings hazardous pathogens, such as the H1N1 virus or HIV, to light in translucent glass forms.

The artist  insists that his sculptures be colorless, in contrast to the images scientists sometimes disseminate that are enhanced with bright hues. “Viruses have no color as they are smaller than the wavelength of light,” says Jerram, in an email. “So the artworks are created as alternative representations of viruses to the artificially colored imagery we receive through the media.” Jerram and Davidson create sketches, which they then take to the glassblowers, to see whether the intricate structures of the diseases can be replicated in glass, at approximately one million times their original size.

Swine Flu, by Luke Jerram.

These glass sculptures require extreme attention to detail. “I consult virologists at the University of Bristol about the details of each artwork,” says Jerram. “Often I’m asking a question about how a particular part of the virion looks, and they don’t know the answer. We have to piece together our understanding by comparing grainy electron microscope images with abstract chemical models and existing diagrams.”

Yet, to physically create these structures in glass, the design may have to be tweaked. Some viruses, in their true form, would simply be too delicate and wouldn’t hold up. Jerram’s representation of the H1N1 (or Swine Flu) virus, for instance, looks far spikier than it might in reality. This was done, not to add to the ferocity of the virus’ image, but to prevent the artwork from crumbling or breaking.

Malaria, by Luke Jerram.

Jerram has to decide what to do when new research suggests different forms for the structures of viruses. “Over time, scientific understanding of the virus improves and so I have to amend my models accordingly,” explains the artist. For example, “I’m currently in dialogue with a scientist at the University of Florida about the structure of the smallpox virus. He has published papers that show a very different understanding of the internal structure. I now need to consider whether to create a new model or wait until his model has become more widely accepted by the scientific community.” Jerram’s art is often used in scientific journals as an alternative to colorful simulations, so being as up-to-date as possible is definitely in his best interest.

Enterovirus 71, involved in hand, foot and mouth disease, by Luke Jerram.

Jerram’s marvelous glass sculptures bring awareness to some of the worst killers of our age. “The pieces are made for people to contemplate the global impact of each disease,” he says. “I’m interested in sharing the tension that has arisen between the artworks’ beauty and what they represent.”

Jerram’s microbial sculptures are on display in “Playing with Fire: 50 Years of Contemporary Glass,” an exhibition at New York’s Museum of Art and Design through April 7, 2013, and “Pulse: Art and Medicine,” opening at Strathmore Fine Art in Bethesda, Maryland, on February 16. “Pulse” runs through April 13, 2013.

Editor’s Note, February 15, 2013: Earlier versions of this post incorrectly stated or implied that E. coli and malaria are viruses. They are not–E. coli is a bacteria and malaria is a malaise caused by microorganisms. Errors in the first paragraph were fixed and the title of the post was changed.



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

36 Comments »

  1. Robert Durfee says:

    These sculptures are beautiful, but two of them are not viruses. E. coli is a bacterium and malaria is a parasite.

  2. Chris says:

    Neither E. Coli nor Malaria are viruses.

  3. Stuartg says:

    Anyone can distinguish E.coli from HIV under a microscope.

    E. coli is a bacterium and so is large enough to be seen under a light microscope. HIV is a virus, much smaller than a bacterium, and cannot be seen under a light microscope (it needs an electron microscope instead).

  4. Jennifer Apple says:

    Before you blog something, please check to be sure you know what you are talking about. E. coli is not a virus.

  5. Luís Duarte says:

    Interesting article, but the following sentence should be corrected: “Few non-scientists would be able to distinguish the E. coli virus from HIV under a microscope.”

    E. coli is a bacteria and not a virus and the name should always be italicized or (alternately) underlined.

  6. Sachin says:

    In old age people fear TIGERS and LIONS, but artists used get facinated by the Objects(and carve the animals in stone or paint on cave walls). In this era, the objects are Viruses!
    FANTASTIC!

  7. a scientist says:

    why is the first image in an article about virus art NOT a virus? quit misleading the public, smithsonian. you guys can do better. E. coli =/= E. coli virus.

  8. Tom says:

    E. Coli is not a virus

  9. Dbg says:

    E. coli is not a virus. It is a type of bacteria. Totally, completely, different things. Please fix so that my brain stops hurting.

  10. Sergiu says:

    E. coli virus??? It’s a bacterium!

  11. Ben says:

    I’m sorry to make a correction.
    But E. coli is a bacteria, not a virus.

    This by no means is meant to play down the glass sculpture.
    I think they are amazing visualisations.

  12. nw says:

    E.Coli is a bacteria, not a virus.

  13. Rikard says:

    There are some glaring errors in this text: E. Coli is not a virus, but a bacteria. And malaria are a set of parasites (of the genus Plasmodium), not viruses. The sculptures are beautiful, however.

  14. Brian Miller says:

    Neither E. Coli nor the organism that causes malaria are viruses. E. Coli is a bacterium and malaria is caused by a protist.

  15. W. Wimley says:

    E. coli is NOT A VIRUS! It is a bacteria. Totally different and unrelated to a virus.

  16. james says:

    Stating the obvious, but E. Coli and Malaria are not viruses. You might want to rethink the title of the article.

  17. theo says:

    Yah ok..but e. coli aint no virus childrens..I learned that in Microbiology 101. cheerio

    T

  18. RayJ says:

    This art is awesome and the article is good too but you should amend it so that it doesn’t say that microorganisms like E. coli (bacteria) and Malaria (caused by a protist) are viruses.

  19. Pete says:

    Although there are bacteriophages that can “infect” E. coli, the E. coli you show is is a bacterium not a virus (or phage).

  20. Pete says:

    Malaria is caused by the infection of red blood cells by Plasmodium (also not a virus). This art is exceptional and very cool, but the article will takes some of that away. It would be good to fix that text and then delete these comments.

  21. “Few non-scientists would be able to distinguish the E. coli bacteria from the HIV virus under a microscope. Both are as different in their design as they are in their outwardly effects.”

    ?

    Besides being a bizarrely self-contradictory statement, yes, this non scientist can distinguish them because this non scientist can tell a mouse from an elephant, based solely on the size difference. Who wrote this?

    Why would I come back to this site after reading that?

  22. Vina says:

    E. coli is not a virus. Neither are the protists that cause malaria.

  23. brian says:

    e.coli virus??

    ouch.

    yes, e.coli bacteria have viruses specific to them, but they don’t look like the glassworks here, which are of e.coli bacteria. Can you update that?

    Beautiful glasswork.

  24. Charlie says:

    Amazing interesting. I found the YouTube video to be both informative and visually fascinating. Thank you.

  25. Nicole says:

    Please, please change the title. The word “virus” has a very specific meaning. If you’re looking for a word that encompasses fungi, bacteria and viruses, use the word bugs, just like everybody does who works in these fields does.

  26. Tina says:

    Grammatical correction in the first sentence. HIV should not be referred to as “HIV virus.” The V in HIV is the word virus.

  27. Frances Klodt says:

    Very interesting. Are they made up of sub atomic particles? Are they energy or mass? I read that Dark energy isn’t really dark it is transparent. What would you get if you ran a virus through the Hadron C.

  28. Mario Alvarez says:

    The pictures of the viruses have cinched for me the realization that no enemy is quite as nice looking, as it behaves (i.e. the current savage Homo Sapient Christopher Dornan) who is almost always smiling bit, and looks quite friendly, but has killed at least three other very civilized humans. So you see, really is the case that no one is the way he/she seems. (or nothing is?)

  29. Joan says:

    Great artwork but the article should have been edited by a scientist. E.coli is a bacteria and malaria is caused by plasmodium.

  30. JazzZyx says:

    I would like ton see the name(s?) of the glass blowers who did the actual work of these marvelous sculptures included in the article. If Jerram is unwilling to share credit with the glass blower, then I don’t have much regard for him.

  31. Frederick Mitchel says:

    The article refers to E. coli as a virus. It is a bacteria.

  32. rob d says:

    Could you please change the title from “viruses” to “pathogens” or “microoganisms”? E. coli is a bacterial species (living thing), and malaria (Plasmodium, really) is a protozoan (also a living thing). It is important to get the basic science right. Thanks.

  33. Allie says:

    E. coli IS NOT A VIRUS. It is a bacteria.

    • Mohi Kumar says:

      Dear readers,

      You are all quite correct! E. coli and malaria are not viruses. We’ve changed the title and fixed errors in the first paragraph. Thank you for your attention to detail and scientific accuracy.

      Best,

      Mohi Kumar
      Surprising Science Blog Editor

  34. will knutsen says:

    Darth Vader’s Death Star had a sense of the same kind of beauty. Yes?

  35. N. Martin says:

    In this video he credits Kim George as one collaborative glassblower: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhWgq8622Mw&feature=player_embedded

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement