<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taking a Closer Look at Archaeopteryx</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2008/12/taking-a-closer-look-at-archaeopteryx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2008/12/taking-a-closer-look-at-archaeopteryx/</link>
	<description>Where Paleontology Meets Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Switek</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2008/12/taking-a-closer-look-at-archaeopteryx/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Switek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=630#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Sean; Aves is part of the clade Paraves (Aves + Deinonychosauria), which is itself a clade within the Maniraptora, so yes, Archaeopteryx is a maniraptoran. Where it should fall in Paraves, though, might be up for revision with more fossil finds, particularly as the positions of Scansoriopteryx and Epidexipteryx are refined.

Archaeopteryx does have a wee-little hyperextendable killing claw, too, shown especially in the Thermopolis specimen. This is interesting because it may mean that the killing claws first appeared when these dinosaurs were small, and were not used to bring down/cut open large prey (that was a later use when the deinonychosaurs got larger).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean; Aves is part of the clade Paraves (Aves + Deinonychosauria), which is itself a clade within the Maniraptora, so yes, Archaeopteryx is a maniraptoran. Where it should fall in Paraves, though, might be up for revision with more fossil finds, particularly as the positions of Scansoriopteryx and Epidexipteryx are refined.</p>
<p>Archaeopteryx does have a wee-little hyperextendable killing claw, too, shown especially in the Thermopolis specimen. This is interesting because it may mean that the killing claws first appeared when these dinosaurs were small, and were not used to bring down/cut open large prey (that was a later use when the deinonychosaurs got larger).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Craven</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2008/12/taking-a-closer-look-at-archaeopteryx/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Craven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=630#comment-241</guid>
		<description>I have a question. Is Archaeopteryx currently considered a maniraptoran? Does it actually have a wee little sickle claw?

(I just realized that I have these notions in my head with no clear understanding as to how they&#039;ve got there. To paraphrase Robertson Davies, &quot;I am, of course, a self-educated man.&quot; &quot;But your education is a mess!&quot; &quot;Ah, but it&#039;s a rich, fruity mess.&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question. Is Archaeopteryx currently considered a maniraptoran? Does it actually have a wee little sickle claw?</p>
<p>(I just realized that I have these notions in my head with no clear understanding as to how they&#8217;ve got there. To paraphrase Robertson Davies, &#8220;I am, of course, a self-educated man.&#8221; &#8220;But your education is a mess!&#8221; &#8220;Ah, but it&#8217;s a rich, fruity mess.&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
