September 17, 2009
Raptorex: A New, Tiny Tyrant

A restoration of the skeleton of Raptorex. From the Science paper.
Tyrannosaurus and its close kin Daspletosaurus, Tarbosaurus, Albertosaurus, and Gorgosaurus were among the largest land-dwelling predators the world has ever known. They had massive heads full of huge, serrated teeth and were the dominant predators in the times and places in which they lived. Surprisingly, though, many of the features that make these dinosaurs so recognizable appeared much, much earlier. In this week’s edition of Science, an international team of scientists describes a new, diminutive precursor to the more familiar Cretaceous giants. It was discovered in approximately 130-million-year-old rocks in China. They have named it Raptorex kriegsteini.
At first glance you could be excused for thinking that Raptorex was the juvenile stage of one of the later tyrannosaurids. At only about 10 feet long, it had long, gracile legs, a slender-looking head, a large eye socket, and ridiculously small forelimbs which terminated in claws. While it was not quite a fully mature individual, it was not the juvenile stage of an already-known dinosaur. It was something scientists had never seen before, one that can tell us much about how its giant cousins evolved.
Up until now paleontologists have been working with the bookends to the tyrannosaur evolutionary series. There were the classic, large-bodied terrors like Tyrannosaurus and the more recently-discovered, raptor-like dinosaurs like Dilong and Guanlong from China. Raptorex fits somewhere in between, and even though it was small it possessed many of the characteristics seen in its larger relatives.
While Raptorex did not have the heavy, knobbly head of Tyrannosaurus, its head was relatively large for its body size; about 10 percent larger for its body size than the skulls of earlier relatives like Guanlong. Raptorex also had incisor-like teeth in the front of its mouth, a condition seen dinosaurs like Tyrannosaurus but not the early tyrannosauroids. Add to that the expanded areas for jaw muscle attachment and you get a “miniature” tryannosaur with a terrifying bite.
What is really interesting, though, is that Raptorex had small arms in which the humerus (upper arm bone) is longer than the lower arm. These short, robust arms were tipped in claws. While a biomechanical study of the arms of Raptorex has yet to be carried out, this arrangement suggests that short-yet-strong arms of the tyrannosaurids evolved when the lineage was still relatively small.
This discovery is very important because just why Tyrannosaurus and its close relatives had such small arms has long been an evolutionary puzzle. The arms of the relatively small Raptorex may help paleontologists understand whether arm size was an adaptation to a particular hunting style or the consequence of something else, like a change in growth rate. In addition to the other characteristics documented by the paper’s authors, many of the tell-tale tyrannosaurid traits first evolved when the lineage was still small, contrary to what paleontologists had expected.
The description of Raptorex is made all the sweeter by the fact that it was almost lost to science. In an University of Chicago interview, Paul Sereno, the lead author on the new paper, explains that the skeleton of Raptorex was excavated by a local person and sold to a private owner. This private owner then approached Sereno, and the scientist was adamant that the skeleton be donated to science (and eventually returned to China). Had Raptorex stayed in private hands we would still be in the dark about this crucial point in tyrannosaur evolution.
Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.
11 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI






















I take it the pink represents areas that were filled in. Because if they represent what was found, than that’s and awfully scanty set of remains! But from what i can tell, it is just the missing bits filled in, given all the talk about the limbs and skull.
Yeah, thank the lucky stars the guy donated it to science. I often think of all the fossils that end up in private collections. I would love to ask the owners “why must knowledge stand still just you can use it as a mantle piece?” And while many are important to science, i wonder just how important. I just wonder because it has been hammered into my head that a fossil needs field data or it has lost much of it’s scientific value. Since a lot of these commercial collectors don’t keep such records, if the specimen does end up in the hands of science, does it still hold that value, given it’s probable lack of collection data? A paleontologist i know said he would never use a specimen in a private collection in a paper or for research.
I worked with a few commercial collectors this summer, and was very impressed. They dislike the ‘grab the skull and run’ types as much as more academic paleontologists do; since it makes it even harder for them to do what they do without some kind of dishonest image. But their field abilities and record keeping was quite astounding (I guess they’d have to given that they sell their stuff to museums, but still; they’re actually in the process of writing a few papers on some of the innovative field and preparation techniques that they came up with).
And as for the ‘won’t do a paper on something in a private collection’… I’m not so sure how I feel about that. I know it’s frustrating to not have the stratigraphic information, but if something exists and further enhances our understanding of paleontology, I see no need to turn a blind eye.
Even if it’s just saying ‘we found this, it’s intact and in its original shape but we don’t know where it come from; however, here are its affinities!’ etc.
Doug; Yes. The pink bits are the parts that are missing. It is an amazingly complete specimen.
Everyone seems surprised by the tiny arms on this tyrannosaur, as if the small arms were linked to the larger tyrannosaur’s body size. Correct me if I’m wrong but I was under the impression that the arm size had less to do with the size of the animal and more to do with the size of the head in order to prevent the animal from being front heavy. Raptorex has a large head, so wouldn’t the small arms make sense? The size of the animal itself shouldn’t matter.
Tor Bertin wrote: “And as for the ‘won’t do a paper on something in a private collection’… I’m not so sure how I feel about that. I know it’s frustrating to not have the stratigraphic information, but if something exists and further enhances our understanding of paleontology, I see no need to turn a blind eye.
Even if it’s just saying ‘we found this, it’s intact and in its original shape but we don’t know where it come from; however, here are its affinities!’ etc.”
Well, it does kind of matter. For example, if this taxon came from a much younger formation, they might have been more inclined to think it was a juvenile of an existing tyrannosaurid species. It also wouldn’t be as ‘exciting’ as finding a new 125-130 mya taxon filling the gap between basal tyrannosauroids and the Tyrannosauridae…
Tor,
See what i mean? It’s kind of confusing how they emphasize so much the importance of field data, but when a specimen like this shows up, it’s almost like it gets overlooked. It’s just kind of confusing.
As for the “not using private specimens”, this is how he felt: “My personal choice is that I will not consider any specimen in a private collection in my scientific studies; I think most paleontologists would agree with me on this point. Any time I assert some point based on a fossil, that specimen must be available for other scientists to examine in an attempt to refute my point. If a person chooses to keep a legally-collected important fossil as their own, that’s their business as far as I’m concerned. But they can’t have it both ways. If they want recognition from the scientific community, they need to place the specimen in a museum.” I mean, that’s just how he feels.
[...] month for tyrannosaur research. We have been introduced to the comparatively tiny tyrannosauroid Raptorex, have learned that Tyrannosaurus probably suffered from a parasitic infestation similar to one seen [...]
[...] 5) Raptorex [...]
[...] that issue — our monthly Wild Things feature which this month highlights geckos, the Raptorex previously written about in Dinosaur Tracking, and asexual reproduction among [...]
[...] of the biggest dinosaur stories of 2009 was the discovery of a pint-sized tyrant called Raptorex. Described by a team of paleontologists led by Paul Sereno and dated to about 126 million years [...]