Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Dinosaur Tracking

Where paleontology meets pop culture

Hominid Hunting

Meet the members of the tangled human family tree

Innovations

How human ingenuity is changing the way we live

Surprising Science

Ideas, news and discoveries from the world of science


October 28, 2009

“Bone-Headed” Dinosaurs Reshaped Their Skulls

A pair of pachycephalosaurs face off. Photographed at the Museum of Ancient Life at Thanksgiving Point, Utah.

A pair of pachycephalosaurs face off. Photographed at the Museum of Ancient Life at Thanksgiving Point, Utah.

If you knew nothing at all about dogs, but you were presented with a lineup of the skeletons of a variety of breeds from chihuahua to bulldog to German shepherd to mastiff, you could be excused for thinking they were different species. Their skeletons seem to be so different, yet we know they are all just varieties of one subspecies, Canis lupus familiaris, that have been created through artificial selection. Paleontologists, on the other hand, do not have breeder’s records and must think carefully about what distinguishes one species of dinosaur from another. A new study by Jack Horner and Mark Goodwin in the journal PLoS One suggests that some dinosaurs previously thought to be separate species, even genera, were really just the growth stages of one species of dinosaur.

The dinosaurs that are the focus of the new study are three “bone-heads,” or pachycephalosaurs: Pachycephalosaurus, Stygimoloch, and Dracorex. These were bipedal ornithischian dinosaurs that had hard bony domes on their heads, often complemented with an array of spikes. Dracorex was small with a relatively flat head with small spikes, Stygimoloch was mid-sized with a small bony dome and huge horns, and Pachycephalosaurus was large with a large bony dome and relatively small horns. Together these dinosaurs appear to represent a growth series from juvenile to adult, all grouped together as Pachycephalosaurus, and the evidence can be found in the makeup of the bones.

Even though bones are hard they are not static things. They are constantly being remodeled; the change may be difficult to see from day to day but bone is still constantly being reabsorbed and laid down. The same processes happened in these dinosaurs, allowing for major modifications of the skull.

Looking at the microscopic structure of the skull bones, Horner and Goodwin found that the horns on the skulls they examined started off small, grew large, and then were reorganized as smaller structures around the edge of the solid dome of the skull. The young dinosaurs were not born with adult ornamentation but grew into it over time. Why large spikes were a juvenile characteristic and a bony dome was an adult characteristic, however, is still unknown.

Extreme changes in skull shape during growth can also be seen in hadrosaurs, where what were considered “small” species turned out to be juveniles of already known species, and in horned dinosaurs. In fact, at this year’s Society of Vertebrate Paleontology meeting, Horner and paleontologist John Scannella proposed that Triceratops is a growth stage of the larger horned dinosaur presently known as Torosaurus. This hypothesis has yet to be fully supported, but it does seem that many Cretaceous ornithischian dinosaurs underwent major anatomical changes during their lifetimes. No doubt this area of research will generate much discussion and debate in the years to come.



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

8 Comments »

  1. Zach Miller says:

    This seems well-supported in the paper, but I’m critical of the Triceratops/Torosaurus thing mainly because of the structure of the parietals. There isn’t one example of Torosaurus WITHOUT parietal fenestrae. There also isn’t an example of a Triceratops skull WITH parietal fenestrae. Scannella suggested that thin sections of Triceratops’ parietal became fenestrae, but as far as I know, there is no “middle of the road” specimen. This is odd, considering Triceratops is ridiculously common.

  2. Wait for the paper says:

    It’s amazing what people can fail to see unless they’re looking for it. Keep an eye on JVP in the next year.

    And since the Toro/Tric distinction is basicially defined on the presence/absence of parietal fenestrae, of course you won’t get a Toro with a solid frill, or a Tric with big holes.

  3. Eric says:

    Zach maybe the “Triceratops Maximus” skull (apparently some kind of ten foot Triceratops skull, being studied by Bakker) is in fact the middle of the road specimen.

  4. Zach Miller says:

    Well, give me a Triceratops with small parietals. Surely the only thing separating the two genera is not limited to the presence/absence of parietal fenestrae.

  5. [...] “Bone-Headed” Dinosaurs Reshaped Their Skulls. A few years ago it was announced that there was some evidence that what were once thought to be three distinct “bone-headed” dinosaurs were really just growth stages of Pachychephalosaurus. The research supporting this hypothesis was published this year, and while it is still being debated, it has opened up questions about the identity of other dinosaurs, too. [...]

  6. [...] spread to that continent. This, added to the recent discovery that pachycephalosaur heads might be drastically restructured as they age, means that further research will be likely to shake up the pachycephalosaur family [...]

  7. [...] but only just. Recent studies have suggested that apparently distinct dinosaurian genera are the immature forms of others. As such, it has been suggested that Triceratops may be an immature [...]

  8. [...] and Mark Goodwin proposed that the dome-headed dinosaurs Dracorex and Stygimoloch were actually immature representatives of the larger Pachycephalosaurus. Last year, Horner and colleague John Scannella made a bigger [...]

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement