<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Commentary Stirs Dino-Bird Brouhaha</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/02/new-commentary-stirs-dino-bird-brouhaha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/02/new-commentary-stirs-dino-bird-brouhaha/</link>
	<description>Where Paleontology Meets Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What does the fossil record say? - Page 168 - Religious Education Forum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/02/new-commentary-stirs-dino-bird-brouhaha/comment-page-1/#comment-3683</link>
		<dc:creator>What does the fossil record say? - Page 168 - Religious Education Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 20:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=2734#comment-3683</guid>
		<description>[...] soundly thrashed here: http://www.pnas.org/content/107/40/E155.extract and here among other places. New Commentary Stirs Dino-Bird Brouhaha &#124; Dinosaur Tracking    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] soundly thrashed here: <a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/107/40/E155.extract" rel="nofollow">http://www.pnas.org/content/107/40/E155.extract</a> and here among other places. New Commentary Stirs Dino-Bird Brouhaha | Dinosaur Tracking    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microraptor in UV and feather attachment &#171; Dave Hone&#8217;s Archosaur Musings</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/02/new-commentary-stirs-dino-bird-brouhaha/comment-page-1/#comment-1569</link>
		<dc:creator>Microraptor in UV and feather attachment &#171; Dave Hone&#8217;s Archosaur Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=2734#comment-1569</guid>
		<description>[...] Edit: further coverage from friends and colleagues at Dracovenator, The Whirlpool of Life, and Dinosaur Tracking. Thanks to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Edit: further coverage from friends and colleagues at Dracovenator, The Whirlpool of Life, and Dinosaur Tracking. Thanks to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roogs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/02/new-commentary-stirs-dino-bird-brouhaha/comment-page-1/#comment-1568</link>
		<dc:creator>Roogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=2734#comment-1568</guid>
		<description>Or, as we would say on the internetz: EPIC FAIL on Ruben.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, as we would say on the internetz: EPIC FAIL on Ruben.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris y</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/02/new-commentary-stirs-dino-bird-brouhaha/comment-page-1/#comment-1566</link>
		<dc:creator>chris y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=2734#comment-1566</guid>
		<description>So, by analogy, the fact that bats are laurasiatheres refutes the classification of colugos in euarchonta. Or vice versa. Or something. Or nothing. Is anybody impressed by this sort of stuff outside their little closed circle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, by analogy, the fact that bats are laurasiatheres refutes the classification of colugos in euarchonta. Or vice versa. Or something. Or nothing. Is anybody impressed by this sort of stuff outside their little closed circle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly PLoS ONE News and Blog Round-Up &#171; everyONE &#8211; the PLoS ONE community blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/02/new-commentary-stirs-dino-bird-brouhaha/comment-page-1/#comment-1565</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly PLoS ONE News and Blog Round-Up &#171; everyONE &#8211; the PLoS ONE community blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=2734#comment-1565</guid>
		<description>[...] You can read the interview with David Hone on Dinochick Blogs, and additional coverage on Smithsonian&#8217;s Dinosaur Tracking and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can read the interview with David Hone on Dinochick Blogs, and additional coverage on Smithsonian&#8217;s Dinosaur Tracking and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
