Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Dinosaur Tracking

Where paleontology meets pop culture

Hominid Hunting

Meet the members of the tangled human family tree

Innovations

How human ingenuity is changing the way we live

Surprising Science

Ideas, news and discoveries from the world of science


February 8, 2010

Why Did Mammals Survive When Dinosaurs Perished?

A family tree of early mammals showing diversity through time. The red line marks the end-Cretaceous mass extinction; notice that some groups go extinct or dwindle after this line. Modified from Luo, 2007 in Nature.

A family tree of early mammals showing diversity through time. The red line marks the end-Cretaceous mass extinction; notice that some groups go extinct or dwindle after this line. Modified from Luo, 2007 in Nature.

Had the non-avian dinosaurs not been wiped out 65 million years ago, our species would probably never existed. The mass extinction that struck at the end of the Cretaceous was one of the major events in earth’s history that greatly affected evolution by pruning back the tree of life, and it was in the wake of the extinction that mammals became the dominant vertebrates on land. What scientists have been trying to figure out, however, is why mammals survived while the dinosaurs perished.

According to Penn State researcher Russ Graham, the lifestyles of mammals gave them an advantage when the asteroid struck the area that is today’s Yucatan peninsula about 65 million years ago. In response to a “probing question” published on the university’s website, Graham opined that mammals that used burrows or lived in aquatic environments would have been shielded from the intense heat that briefly followed the impact. Once the heat was off, mammals could come back out and make the most of the remaining food resources. There may not have been enough food for dinosaurs, but the more generalized tastes of mammals allowed them to hang on.

Yet the Cretaceous mass extinction is not quite so clear cut. Much of what we know about the last days of the dinosaurs has come from North America, close to the site of impact, so how the pattern of extinction emerged elsewhere in the world is still poorly understood. And, contrary to popular perceptions, mammals did not escape the extinction event unscathed. Several groups of mammals most people have never heard of (like the triconodontids, spalacotheroids, dryolestids and multituberculates) perished right at or not long after the extinction event. Some groups of mammals did survive, but others were either wiped out or so reduced in diversity that, like the dinosaurs, they fell into extinction.

Mass extinctions are the greatest murder mysteries ever known. Figuring out why some forms went extinct and others survived is no easy task, and I doubt that even the mythical deductive powers of Sherlock Holmes could have resolved the puzzles facing paleontologists. The survival of some mammals is itself just one mystery embedded in a more perplexing question, and scientists are still busily collecting evidence from the scene of the crime.

[Image modified from Luo, Zhe-Xi. (2007) "Transformation and diversification in early mammal evolution." Nature, 450 , pp. 1011-1019]



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

6 Comments »

  1. chris y says:

    like the triconodontids, spalacotheroids, dryolestids and multituberculates

    Really? I thought the multis hung on to the end of the Eocene.

  2. Brian Switek says:

    Chris; Yes, the multis did hang on for a while. That is why I qualified by statement by saying that some of the groups I mentioned suffered a major decline in diversity and died out not long afterward. You are right that multis hung on for a bit, but their diversity was nothing like what it had previously been. Thanks for bringing that up.

  3. 220mya says:

    Hey now, multituberculates made it into the Eocene. However, specific lineages of multis *did* go extinct across the K-T boundary.

  4. 220mya says:

    Sorry – Chris’s comment didn’t show up when I submitted mine.

  5. Raymond says:

    While many of the higher multi clade rankings did indeed go extinct, it was the Paleocene that was their heyday in terms of species numbers and overall biomass IIRC. It was the rise of Glires that did them in most likely.

  6. [...] have long been characterized as the underdogs of the Mesozoic world. They diversified in habitats ecologically dominated by dinosaurs, but, even though most were small, they did not [...]

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement