<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Did Mammals Survive When Dinosaurs Perished?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/02/why-did-mammals-survive-when-dinosaurs-perished/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/02/why-did-mammals-survive-when-dinosaurs-perished/</link>
	<description>Where Paleontology Meets Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Small Mammals Bit Down on Dino Bones &#124; Dinosaur Tracking</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/02/why-did-mammals-survive-when-dinosaurs-perished/comment-page-1/#comment-2246</link>
		<dc:creator>Small Mammals Bit Down on Dino Bones &#124; Dinosaur Tracking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=2690#comment-2246</guid>
		<description>[...] have long been characterized as the underdogs of the Mesozoic world. They diversified in habitats ecologically dominated by dinosaurs, but, even though most were small, they did not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have long been characterized as the underdogs of the Mesozoic world. They diversified in habitats ecologically dominated by dinosaurs, but, even though most were small, they did not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/02/why-did-mammals-survive-when-dinosaurs-perished/comment-page-1/#comment-2039</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 16:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=2690#comment-2039</guid>
		<description>While many of the higher multi clade rankings did indeed go extinct, it was the Paleocene that was their heyday in terms of species numbers and overall biomass IIRC. It was the rise of Glires that did them in most likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While many of the higher multi clade rankings did indeed go extinct, it was the Paleocene that was their heyday in terms of species numbers and overall biomass IIRC. It was the rise of Glires that did them in most likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 220mya</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/02/why-did-mammals-survive-when-dinosaurs-perished/comment-page-1/#comment-1533</link>
		<dc:creator>220mya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=2690#comment-1533</guid>
		<description>Sorry - Chris&#039;s comment didn&#039;t show up when I submitted mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry &#8211; Chris&#8217;s comment didn&#8217;t show up when I submitted mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 220mya</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/02/why-did-mammals-survive-when-dinosaurs-perished/comment-page-1/#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator>220mya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=2690#comment-1532</guid>
		<description>Hey now, multituberculates made it into the Eocene.  However, specific lineages of multis *did* go extinct across the K-T boundary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey now, multituberculates made it into the Eocene.  However, specific lineages of multis *did* go extinct across the K-T boundary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Switek</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/02/why-did-mammals-survive-when-dinosaurs-perished/comment-page-1/#comment-1531</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Switek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=2690#comment-1531</guid>
		<description>Chris; Yes, the multis did hang on for a while. That is why I qualified by statement by saying that some of the groups I mentioned suffered a major decline in diversity and died out not long afterward. You are right that multis hung on for a bit, but their diversity was nothing like what it had previously been. Thanks for bringing that up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris; Yes, the multis did hang on for a while. That is why I qualified by statement by saying that some of the groups I mentioned suffered a major decline in diversity and died out not long afterward. You are right that multis hung on for a bit, but their diversity was nothing like what it had previously been. Thanks for bringing that up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris y</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/02/why-did-mammals-survive-when-dinosaurs-perished/comment-page-1/#comment-1530</link>
		<dc:creator>chris y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=2690#comment-1530</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;like the triconodontids, spalacotheroids, dryolestids and multituberculates&lt;/i&gt;

Really? I thought the multis hung on to the end of the Eocene.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>like the triconodontids, spalacotheroids, dryolestids and multituberculates</i></p>
<p>Really? I thought the multis hung on to the end of the Eocene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
