Blogs

  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Lifestyle
  • |
  • Science
  • |
  • Travel

Where paleontology meets pop culture


Meet the members of the tangled human family tree


How human ingenuity is changing the way we live


Ideas, news and discoveries from the world of science


March 10, 2010

Asteroid Strike Confirmed as Dinosaur Killer

Distribution of some important end-Cretaceous sites around the world. The black star denotes the site of impact. From the Science paper.

Distribution of some important end-Cretaceous sites around the world. The black star denotes the site of impact. From the Science paper.

Sixty-five million years ago, life on Earth suffered one of the worst mass extinctions of all time. It was an event that killed creatures across the spectrum of life’s diversity, from tiny marine invertebrates to the largest dinosaurs, but what could have caused it?

A number of hypotheses have been forwarded over the years, most of which have focused on dinosaurs. It would take an entire book to discuss them all. Depending on who you ask, the non-avian dinosaurs succumbed to disease, nest-raiding mammals, hungry-hungry caterpillars, or simply became too big to survive, but over the past three decades most paleontologists have agreed that the impact of an asteroid in what is now the Yucatan Peninsula played a major role in the end-Cretaceous extinction. A collaboration by more than 40 scientists published last week in the journal Science reaffirms this hypothesis.

The end of the Cretaceous was a time marked by catastrophic geological events. Not only did a chunk of extraterrestrial rock strike the earth, but, prior to the impact, a group of volcanoes in India known as the Deccan Traps were undergoing massive eruptions. These events have been well established through geological evidence, but the question is what roles they might have played in the extinction of so many kinds of organisms at the end of the period. This is what the international team behind the Science paper wanted to determine.

After looking at a variety of sites recording the end of the Cretaceous and the beginning of the next period, the Paleogene, the scientists determined that the asteroid impact occurred at the boundary between the two (and not hundreds of thousands of years earlier, as some geologists have recently proposed). This is important because the timing of the geological event must be tied to the record of species extinction seen in the fossil record, and the present study suggests that the impact and the extinctions are closely associated. The consequences of the eruptions of the Deccan Traps should not be ignored, but it appears that they do not fit the pattern of mass extinction as well as the asteroid impact.

But what exactly happened that resulted in the deaths of so many kinds of organisms? According to the authors, the initial impact would have triggered massive earthquakes in the region and sent enormous tidal waves to the shore. From a distance it would have looked like a bomb going off, with the impact throwing a mixture of scalding air, material from the asteroid and fragments of the Earth’s crust. The matter exploded with so much force that some probably escaped into space. Some of this material landed in parts of the globe far from the center of impact, and while they were not hot enough to start forest fires (as was previously thought) the bits and pieces could have heated things up in habitats all around the world.

Yet some of the most devastating effects of the impact would not be felt immediately. Among the rocky slurry cast up into the atmosphere were soot and sulfur gases which, by current estimates, could have cooled the global climate by up to 10 degrees Celsius (18 degrees Fahrenheit) for several decades, and some of that atmospheric sulfur precipitated back down in the form of acid rain. Indeed, the most significant part of the event was not the shock of impact but the fact that the asteroid struck an area rich in sulfur and other materials that, once thrown up into the atmosphere, drastically changed the global climate and ecology. Had the asteroid struck somewhere else on the planet the consequences could have been very different for life on earth.

This does not mean that the details of the end-Cretaceous extinction have been all wrapped up, however. Most of what we know about the extinction comes from North America, but we still don’t know very much about what was going on elsewhere in the world. To draw an analogy with forensics, scientists have identified the weapon used in the massacre, but doing so is only a small part of fully understanding what happened.

Schulte, P., Alegret, L., Arenillas, I., Arz, J., Barton, P., Bown, P., Bralower, T., Christeson, G., Claeys, P., Cockell, C., Collins, G., Deutsch, A., Goldin, T., Goto, K., Grajales-Nishimura, J., Grieve, R., Gulick, S., Johnson, K., Kiessling, W., Koeberl, C., Kring, D., MacLeod, K., Matsui, T., Melosh, J., Montanari, A., Morgan, J., Neal, C., Nichols, D., Norris, R., Pierazzo, E., Ravizza, G., Rebolledo-Vieyra, M., Reimold, W., Robin, E., Salge, T., Speijer, R., Sweet, A., Urrutia-Fucugauchi, J., Vajda, V., Whalen, M., & Willumsen, P. (2010). The Chicxulub Asteroid Impact and Mass Extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene Boundary Science, 327 (5970), 1214-1218 DOI: 10.1126/science.1177265





11 Comments »

  1. astroid strike really dangerous :(

    Comment by kirod — March 10, 2010 @ 2:10 pm


  2. Yeah I read about this over on National Geographic news. I still wonder though. I’ve heard the acid rain idea doesn’t hold up because animals who are most vulnerable to acid rain, like frogs and salamanders, survived. While this study does reaffirm the asteroid impact idea, it’s obvious this debate isn’t going away any time soon.

    Comment by Doug — March 10, 2010 @ 4:51 pm


  3. [...] long shot, but unlike the end-Cretaceous catastrophe 65 million years ago there is no single “smoking gun” that can account for the pattern of extinction. Instead the Pleistocene mass extinction [...]

    Pingback by Prehistoric DNA reveals the story of a Pleistocene survivor, the muskox [Laelaps] @ Share Crazy — March 11, 2010 @ 12:09 am


  4. This paper seems a little silly to me. There’s nothing new, so the paper seems to be just an attempt to convince by appeal to authority.

    There are at least three problems with the “single impact only” explanation for the KT extinctions (IMHO):

    1. There are lots of other impact craters throughout the historical fossil record (some quite large) that are not associated with any extinctions.

    2. We know that other climate altering events were occurring at the same time (e.g., Deccan Traps).

    3. There seems to be ongoing debate amongst the scientific community regarding understanding the raw data (http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/gsl/views/debates/chicxulub).

    I find it difficult to imagine a scenario where the other climatic changes occurring weren’t at least as culpable as the impact itself. I’m not sure why we need to imagine a global catastrophe of this magnitude happening in an instant, but I find it far more plausible that an unlikely series of events is responsible.

    Comment by James — March 11, 2010 @ 9:28 am


  5. There was no one cause. This paper is no proof. Keep trying, hopefully you give up on this lost cause.

    Comment by david w. nystuen — March 14, 2010 @ 7:30 pm


  6. [...] everyone is familiar with the ongoing debate surrounding the extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs 65 million years ago, but the discussion over where dinosaurs came from in the first place is often [...]

    Pingback by Tracking the Origin of Dinosaurs | Dinosaur Tracking — May 10, 2010 @ 9:53 am


  7. [...] Asteroid Strike Confirmed as Dinosaur Killer | Dinosaur Tracking [...]

    Pingback by Geology Links for May 11th, 2010 | The Geology News Blog — May 11, 2010 @ 8:01 am


  8. [...] ironic graffiti tag on the Carrboro, North Carolina was photographed by reader Jason Adams. The impact of an asteroid in what is now the Yucatan Peninsula was a bit of a bad day for them, but we are [...]

    Pingback by Dinosaur Sighting: Never Forget | Dinosaur Tracking — May 26, 2010 @ 9:57 am


  9. The latest theory about the Cretaceous extinction. Book publicado en http://www.bubok.es. Descarga gratuita. Is very interesant.

    Comment by antonio — May 30, 2010 @ 4:33 am


  10. [...] most were small, they did not simply cower in their burrows until the non-avian dinosaurs were wiped out 65 million years ago. In fact, Mesozoic mammals were more varied in anatomy and habits than is [...]

    Pingback by Small Mammals Bit Down on Dino Bones | Dinosaur Tracking — June 25, 2010 @ 10:21 am


  11. Really nice article – thank you

    Comment by bham — June 25, 2010 @ 8:51 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement