<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Sauropod From Dinosaur National Monument Gets a Name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/03/new-sauropod-from-dinosaur-national-monument-gets-a-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/03/new-sauropod-from-dinosaur-national-monument-gets-a-name/</link>
	<description>Where Paleontology Meets Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remember the Alamosaurus &#124; Dinosaur Tracking</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/03/new-sauropod-from-dinosaur-national-monument-gets-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-2955</link>
		<dc:creator>Remember the Alamosaurus &#124; Dinosaur Tracking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=2795#comment-2955</guid>
		<description>[...] have been just a few discoveries of Cretaceous sauropods in North America. The recently described Abydosaurus was found in the 127- to 98-million-year-old Cedar Mountain Formation of Dinosaur National [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have been just a few discoveries of Cretaceous sauropods in North America. The recently described Abydosaurus was found in the 127- to 98-million-year-old Cedar Mountain Formation of Dinosaur National [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marsh's "Megalosaurus" From Utah &#124; Dinosaur Tracking</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/03/new-sauropod-from-dinosaur-national-monument-gets-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-1837</link>
		<dc:creator>Marsh's "Megalosaurus" From Utah &#124; Dinosaur Tracking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=2795#comment-1837</guid>
		<description>[...] According to an account written by Sue Ann Bilbey and James Evan Hall for Vertebrate Paleontology in Utah, in the summer of 1870 Marsh and a dozen of his Yale students trekked from Wyoming down into what would eventually become northern Utah. (The Beehive State was not admitted to the union until 1896.) They did not stay in any one place very long, but as they traveled they observed many of the fossil deposits around the Uinta Mountains in the northeastern part of the state, eventually making it into the vicinity of what is today Dinosaur National Monument. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to an account written by Sue Ann Bilbey and James Evan Hall for Vertebrate Paleontology in Utah, in the summer of 1870 Marsh and a dozen of his Yale students trekked from Wyoming down into what would eventually become northern Utah. (The Beehive State was not admitted to the union until 1896.) They did not stay in any one place very long, but as they traveled they observed many of the fossil deposits around the Uinta Mountains in the northeastern part of the state, eventually making it into the vicinity of what is today Dinosaur National Monument. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Switek</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/03/new-sauropod-from-dinosaur-national-monument-gets-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-1660</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Switek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=2795#comment-1660</guid>
		<description>Doug; Yes, they did recover the remains of several skulls. I just focused on the most complete one here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug; Yes, they did recover the remains of several skulls. I just focused on the most complete one here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/03/new-sauropod-from-dinosaur-national-monument-gets-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-1659</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=2795#comment-1659</guid>
		<description>huh, i heard they had recovered the remains of between 2 and four skulls. Nonetheless, it&#039;s a cool find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huh, i heard they had recovered the remains of between 2 and four skulls. Nonetheless, it&#8217;s a cool find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
