Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Dinosaur Tracking

Where paleontology meets pop culture

Hominid Hunting

Meet the members of the tangled human family tree

Innovations

How human ingenuity is changing the way we live

Surprising Science

Ideas, news and discoveries from the world of science


May 20, 2010

A Closer Look at Ankylosaur Armor

A restoration of the ankylosaur Sauropelta by John Conway. From Wikipedia.

A restoration of the ankylosaur Sauropelta by John Conway. From Wikipedia.

Many dinosaurs were adorned with spikes, horns and plates, but it was the ankylosaurs that took armor to the extreme. These dinosaurs were covered in bony armor from snout to tail-tip, yet, as a new study suggests, there may have been more to some of these structures than just attack and defense.

As reviewed by paleontologists Shoji Hayashi, Kenneth Carpenter, Torsten Scheyer, Mahito Watabe and Daisuke Suzuki in the journal Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, the ankylosaurs can be subdivided into three smaller groups. There was the Polacanthidae (a group with large shoulder spikes and a “shield” over the hips), the Nodosauridae (forms with narrow heads and lacking tail-clubs) and the Ankylosauridae (the classic type with heavy armor over the body and tail-clubs). (There is some debate as to whether the Polacanthidae should be thought of as a distinct group, but since the authors separate it from the others I will follow their lead here.) Members of each group can be distinguished from each other on the basis of features which can be seen with the naked eye, but they are also different at the microscopic level. The arrangement of collagen fibers—one of the chief components of bone—differs in each group, as does the thickness of the bone composing the armor.

The differences in the bony armor of each kind of ankylosaur may help paleontologists determine to which group a specimen belongs based upon fragmentary material, but they may also indicate the different ways in which ankylosaurs used their armor. When the scientists looked at pieces of armor (including spikes and clubs) from several different dinosaurs across the three groups, they found that some of what might be thought to be weaponry was not well suited to the task. The outer layer of bone in the spikes of the polacanthids, for example, was relatively thin, especially in comparison to similar structures from the skeletons of the nodosaurids. This may mean that while the large spikes on the nodosaurids were sturdy enough to be used as weapons, the more fragile spikes of the polacanthids may have played a role primarily in display or regulating body temperature instead.

Additionally, the partial ankylosaurid tail club the researchers examined still showed signs of bone growth even though it appeared to have come from an adult animal. Combined with other recent findings, such as a possible lack of tail clubs among some juvenile ankylosaurids, this may mean that this structure developed later in life and was not initially used as a weapon. Perhaps, the authors hypothesize, developing tail clubs were used by juveniles and young adults for display, but it was not until later that the clubs could also be used for defense. Whatever they were doing, this study confirms that scientists are still learning much about dinosaurs by looking inside their bones.

Hayashi, S. (2010). Function and evolution of ankylosaur dermal armor Acta Palaeontologica Polonica DOI: 10.4202/app.2009.0103



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

3 Comments »

  1. Hi, very interesting!
    Any such large bony outgrowths, being spectacular, can serve for species-identification, individual recognition and as markers of maturity and status. Are the structures similar or distinct in males and females – if indeed ankylosaur remains can be sexed with confidence? I know Protoceratops skulls differ morphologically between genders and also with growth-stages, juvenile to adult.

    The fragility of bony ornamentation in some species might not necessarily preclude their use in confrontational display or ceremonial fighting (rivalry over territory/a mate) – like the antlers of deer stags – or to deter attack by predators. I imagine a spike need not be terribly robust – just terribly sharp! – to serve as an effective deterrent to approaching closer.

    Bones in females might usefully serve as a store of calcium and other minerals mobilisable for deposition in egg-shells (I am supposing ankylosaur oviparity rather than viviparity – is this known?). So a female having well-developed bony outgrowths might be visibly indicating both her maturity and her capacity for prolific egg-laying.

    I am speculating, but it is fun to imagine. Sometimes one can think what evidences such attributes might have left if true, and maybe go check.

  2. nick gardner says:

    don’t fret Brian. Whether polacanthids are monophyletic is a tricky question. Most phylogenetic analyses seem to recover them as a grade of basal ankylosaurids. Though honestly Carpenter et al. usually unite polacanthids based on postcranial characters that are sorely lacking in most of these analyses as well. And outside of the forms with good cranial representation, the rest are usually not incorporated.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement