<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Relax &#8212; Triceratops Really Did Exist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/08/relax-triceratops-really-did-exist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/08/relax-triceratops-really-did-exist/</link>
	<description>Where Paleontology Meets Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Mexico's Peculiar Two-Horned Dinosaur &#124; Dinosaur Tracking</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/08/relax-triceratops-really-did-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-5078</link>
		<dc:creator>New Mexico's Peculiar Two-Horned Dinosaur &#124; Dinosaur Tracking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=3677#comment-5078</guid>
		<description>[...] Not too shabby for a relative newcomer, but what horned dinosaur can compete with the celebrity of Triceratops and ridiculously well-ornamented genera such as Styracosaurus? Zuniceratops was relatively small, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Not too shabby for a relative newcomer, but what horned dinosaur can compete with the celebrity of Triceratops and ridiculously well-ornamented genera such as Styracosaurus? Zuniceratops was relatively small, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goodbye, Anatotitan? &#124; Dinosaur Tracking</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/08/relax-triceratops-really-did-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-5002</link>
		<dc:creator>Goodbye, Anatotitan? &#124; Dinosaur Tracking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 17:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=3677#comment-5002</guid>
		<description>[...] No one batted an eyelid: &#8220;Huh? Anato-what?&#8221; Compare the lack of reaction to the tizzy the public fell into last year when confused reporters mistakenly told readers that paleontologists were sinking the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No one batted an eyelid: &#8220;Huh? Anato-what?&#8221; Compare the lack of reaction to the tizzy the public fell into last year when confused reporters mistakenly told readers that paleontologists were sinking the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Dinosaur Too Many? &#124; Dinosaur Tracking</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/08/relax-triceratops-really-did-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-4278</link>
		<dc:creator>One Dinosaur Too Many? &#124; Dinosaur Tracking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 17:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=3677#comment-4278</guid>
		<description>[...] of the larger Pachycephalosaurus. Last year, Horner and colleague John Scannella made a bigger splash when they published a Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology paper suggesting that the broad-frilled, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the larger Pachycephalosaurus. Last year, Horner and colleague John Scannella made a bigger splash when they published a Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology paper suggesting that the broad-frilled, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesson #2: DINOSAURS &#171; Let Me Ruin That For You</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/08/relax-triceratops-really-did-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-3992</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesson #2: DINOSAURS &#171; Let Me Ruin That For You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 00:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=3677#comment-3992</guid>
		<description>[...] Recently, new information has come to surface.  You may have heard that that it&#8217;s possible the the Triceratops did not actually exist and was only the juvenile form of the Torosaurus. If such was the case, Relax. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recently, new information has come to surface.  You may have heard that that it&#8217;s possible the the Triceratops did not actually exist and was only the juvenile form of the Torosaurus. If such was the case, Relax. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pastoral Urbanite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The triceratops is the preppiest of the dinosaurs.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/08/relax-triceratops-really-did-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-3913</link>
		<dc:creator>Pastoral Urbanite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The triceratops is the preppiest of the dinosaurs.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=3677#comment-3913</guid>
		<description>[...] And regardless of what you may have read, it actually existed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And regardless of what you may have read, it actually existed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/08/relax-triceratops-really-did-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-3245</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 05:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=3677#comment-3245</guid>
		<description>@bryan Isn&#039;t that what happened?

@Sean Get lost and mind your own business if you don&#039;t like it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bryan Isn&#8217;t that what happened?</p>
<p>@Sean Get lost and mind your own business if you don&#8217;t like it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Dispatch, Part 1 &#124; Dinosaur Tracking</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/08/relax-triceratops-really-did-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-2899</link>
		<dc:creator>Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Dispatch, Part 1 &#124; Dinosaur Tracking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=3677#comment-2899</guid>
		<description>[...] year 2010 might as well be known as the &#8220;Year of the Ceratopsians.&#8221; From the Torosaurus = Triceratops debate to peculiar ceratopsian forms found in unexpected places, our understanding of these dinosaurs is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year 2010 might as well be known as the &#8220;Year of the Ceratopsians.&#8221; From the Torosaurus = Triceratops debate to peculiar ceratopsian forms found in unexpected places, our understanding of these dinosaurs is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/08/relax-triceratops-really-did-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-2651</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=3677#comment-2651</guid>
		<description>Shouldn&#039;t it be Torosaurus never existed. I thought Triceratops was named first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t it be Torosaurus never existed. I thought Triceratops was named first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/08/relax-triceratops-really-did-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-2627</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=3677#comment-2627</guid>
		<description>Why does Jack horner take so much enjoyment in destroying childhood images of dinosaurs. I can live with those stupid looking quills on ceratospian&#039;s arses and i wouldn&#039;t mind thinking of T-rex as a scavenger who takes opportunity to feed when it feels like it. But at some point you need to stop and think about how a dinosaur would Loose bone for an unnecessarily large frill. How can anyone take Jackass horner seriously after that cluster fuck called Jurassic park 3 he was supposed to be advising on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does Jack horner take so much enjoyment in destroying childhood images of dinosaurs. I can live with those stupid looking quills on ceratospian&#8217;s arses and i wouldn&#8217;t mind thinking of T-rex as a scavenger who takes opportunity to feed when it feels like it. But at some point you need to stop and think about how a dinosaur would Loose bone for an unnecessarily large frill. How can anyone take Jackass horner seriously after that cluster fuck called Jurassic park 3 he was supposed to be advising on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/08/relax-triceratops-really-did-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-2608</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=3677#comment-2608</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Triceratops can simply be the juvenile name for a young torosaurus -- sort of like kitten vs. cat; different names, but same animal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Triceratops can simply be the juvenile name for a young torosaurus &#8212; sort of like kitten vs. cat; different names, but same animal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triceratops Not Actually Running Amok</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/08/relax-triceratops-really-did-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-2570</link>
		<dc:creator>Triceratops Not Actually Running Amok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=3677#comment-2570</guid>
		<description>[...] one victory. In the sciene community naming is on a first-come, first name basis. According to the Smithsonian, since the triceratops was named before the torosaurus, Cera gets to keep her name by default. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one victory. In the sciene community naming is on a first-come, first name basis. According to the Smithsonian, since the triceratops was named before the torosaurus, Cera gets to keep her name by default. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Once and Never Dinosaur: In which the triceratops was ripped from my childhood like a band-aid from a gaping wound &#124; Andy Welfle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/08/relax-triceratops-really-did-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-2549</link>
		<dc:creator>The Once and Never Dinosaur: In which the triceratops was ripped from my childhood like a band-aid from a gaping wound &#124; Andy Welfle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=3677#comment-2549</guid>
		<description>[...] friend Leo, the sciency guy that he is, tried to sooth me by showing me this post from the Smithsonian Magazine blog  that says, basically, &#8220;Chill the eff out:&#8221; All of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] friend Leo, the sciency guy that he is, tried to sooth me by showing me this post from the Smithsonian Magazine blog  that says, basically, &#8220;Chill the eff out:&#8221; All of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/08/relax-triceratops-really-did-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-2537</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 21:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=3677#comment-2537</guid>
		<description>@ jurassiraptor - Its just a dinosaur, get over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ jurassiraptor &#8211; Its just a dinosaur, get over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake Stacey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/08/relax-triceratops-really-did-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-2533</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Stacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 16:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=3677#comment-2533</guid>
		<description>What scientists actually say seems irrelevant to what people get upset about -- one is tempted to say that if the astronomers had decided to keep calling Pluto a planet, a Facebook group would have sprung up protesting its demotion!

Maybe you could get an &lt;i&gt;Evolution: Education and Outreach&lt;/i&gt; article out of this in a few months&#039; time . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What scientists actually say seems irrelevant to what people get upset about &#8212; one is tempted to say that if the astronomers had decided to keep calling Pluto a planet, a Facebook group would have sprung up protesting its demotion!</p>
<p>Maybe you could get an <i>Evolution: Education and Outreach</i> article out of this in a few months&#8217; time . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jurassiraptor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/08/relax-triceratops-really-did-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-2507</link>
		<dc:creator>jurassiraptor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 02:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=3677#comment-2507</guid>
		<description>Of course, to now illustrate or replicate a triceratops, everyone will have to draw or sculpt the &quot;torosaurus&quot; look instead of the familiar short frilled triceratops that we are familiar with. This will be the &quot;extinction&quot; of triceratops as we have come to know it from books, drawings, movies, museum displays, replica toys and figures, paleoart, etc. -- unless those creating such things wish to only reconstruct juvenile triceratops (and how often are subadults represented in the aforemention media?) or risk being nitpicked by people like us that their reconstructions are &quot;incorrect&quot; and &quot;outdated.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, to now illustrate or replicate a triceratops, everyone will have to draw or sculpt the &#8220;torosaurus&#8221; look instead of the familiar short frilled triceratops that we are familiar with. This will be the &#8220;extinction&#8221; of triceratops as we have come to know it from books, drawings, movies, museum displays, replica toys and figures, paleoart, etc. &#8212; unless those creating such things wish to only reconstruct juvenile triceratops (and how often are subadults represented in the aforemention media?) or risk being nitpicked by people like us that their reconstructions are &#8220;incorrect&#8221; and &#8220;outdated.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
