<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Vagaceratops Moved</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/11/how-vagaceratops-moved/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/11/how-vagaceratops-moved/</link>
	<description>Where Paleontology Meets Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Switek</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/11/how-vagaceratops-moved/comment-page-1/#comment-3050</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Switek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=4203#comment-3050</guid>
		<description>Anon - Yes, a few have been found. As I said in the post, ceratopsid tracks are rare. (See this reference for some of the only tracks to be published: http://www.jstor.org/pss/4523654) The tracks showed that the dinosaurs did not have a sprawling forelimb posture, but they did not resolve the issue of whether the forelimbs were bent or not. Hopefully paleontologists will find more trackways in the future to compare to the anatomical data which has already been collected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon &#8211; Yes, a few have been found. As I said in the post, ceratopsid tracks are rare. (See this reference for some of the only tracks to be published: <a href="http://www.jstor.org/pss/4523654" rel="nofollow">http://www.jstor.org/pss/4523654</a>) The tracks showed that the dinosaurs did not have a sprawling forelimb posture, but they did not resolve the issue of whether the forelimbs were bent or not. Hopefully paleontologists will find more trackways in the future to compare to the anatomical data which has already been collected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/11/how-vagaceratops-moved/comment-page-1/#comment-3046</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=4203#comment-3046</guid>
		<description>I was under the impression that some trackways of ceratopsians had already been found, adding further credence to the idea that the forelimbs were held in an &quot;intermediate&quot; posture. Anyway, that does not diminish the great job these people have done in reconstructing the limb posture of an ancient animal.

Also, I have heard that there is still one scientist, I think based out of Wisconsin, who holds that ceratopsians held their forelimbs in a sprawling posture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression that some trackways of ceratopsians had already been found, adding further credence to the idea that the forelimbs were held in an &#8220;intermediate&#8221; posture. Anyway, that does not diminish the great job these people have done in reconstructing the limb posture of an ancient animal.</p>
<p>Also, I have heard that there is still one scientist, I think based out of Wisconsin, who holds that ceratopsians held their forelimbs in a sprawling posture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
