April 1, 2011
A New Giant Tyrant, Zhuchengtyrannus
“While 2010 was celebrated as the year of ceratopsians by many,” paleontologist Dave Hone wrote at Archosaur Musings yesterday, “it should not be overlooked the huge number of tyrannosaurs that have cropped up in the last year or so.” He’s right. For a long time Albertosaurus, Gorgosaurus, Daspletosaurus, Tarbosaurus and, of course, Tyrannosaurus made up most of what we knew about the tyrant dinosaurs, and all were large, Late Cretaceous apex predators. Only in the last decade or so have we started to understand the origins and early evolution of these carnivores, and many new species of tyrannosaur have been turned up at field sites and in museum drawers.
Hone, along with a large team of collaborators, has just added another member to the tyrant dinosaur pantheon. Described in an in-press Cretaceous Research paper, the new dinosaur has been named Zhuchengtyrannus magnus. It was an enormous, Late Cretaceous meat-eater.
For the moment, the known remains of Zhuchengtyrannus are limited to part of an upper jaw (the maxilla) and the tooth-bearing portion of the lower jaw (the dentary). They were found in a quarry near the city of Zhucheng in China’s Shandong Province dating to a little more than 73.5 million years ago, not far from where the giant hadrosaur Shantungosaurus was discovered. Isolated tyrannosaur teeth and a toe bone had previously been found in the area, but the new skull material is unique enough to know that Zhuchengtyrannus was distinct from other large tyrants, including a second, as-yet-undescribed tyrannosaur found at the same location.
The distinguishing traits of the Zhuchengtyrannus fossils are subtle features that it takes a paleontologist’s eye to see. How the various fenestrae, fossa, and other landmarks on the skull are organized make all the difference, especially since Zhuchengtyrannus was comparable in size to Tarbosaurus, another tyrannosaur living in the same area at the same time.
Both Zhuchengtyrannus and Tarbosaurus were tyrannosaurines, which is the group of familiar, large-bodied tyrant dinosaurs that lived in Asia and western North America during the Late Cretaceous. The new tyrant was also just as large as some of the largest Tarbosaurus specimens, which themselves were nearly as big as some of the biggest Tyrannosaurus from North America. Together Zhuchengtyrannus, Tarbosaurus, and the unnamed species from Zhucheng mark a high diversity of tyrant dinosaurs around the 74-million-year mark in Cretaceous China.
In fact, the discovery of the new tyrannosaurs from Zhucheng may make Tyrannosaurus an especially unusual predator. Hone and co-authors point out that many prehistoric ecosystems hosted multiple species of large predatory dinosaurs, from the Jurassic Morrison Formation of North America to the Late Cretaceous deposits of Morocco. Although the effects of time-averaging have to be taken into account, the general trend appears to be that multiple species of enormous, carnivorous dinosaurs lived alongside one another and likely had different feeding habits to allow this sort of partitioning.
Where Tyrannosaurus stands out is that it appears to have been the only large predator in many of the places where it has been found. Either there are some yet-undiscovered giant predators waiting to be found in the latest Cretaceous rocks of North America, or there was something different about the ecosystems where Tyrannosaurus lived. (For example, juvenile Tyrannosaurus may have hunted different prey, taking the role that might otherwise be played by a different species of large predator in other environments.) Familiar as they are, many mysterious still surround the tyrant dinosaurs.
For more on Zhuchengtyrannus, see Dave Hone’s posts (I, II, III) on his Archosaur Musings blog.
References:
Hone, D.; Wang, K.; Sullivan, C.; Zhao, X.; Chen, S.; Li, D.; Ji, S.; Ji, Q.; Xing, X. (2011). A new tyrannosaurine theropod, Zhuchengtyrannus magnus is named based on a maxilla and dentary Cretaceous Research : 10.1016/j.cretres.2011.03.005
Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.
8 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI























Thanks for this Brian, nice stuff. And with a last bit of shameless self-promotion, there are lots more posts coming on this! I kinda have to milk it really don’t I?
Yeah, now that i think back, it was a pretty good year for tyrannosaurs.
I think the niche partitioning between the ages of T. rex is an interesting idea. However, i wonder if there may have been another species, based on an apparent hiccup in it’s ontogeny: http://accpaleo.wordpress.com/2010/08/21/just-a-thought/
Doug: I don’t see the same ‘hiccup’ you refer to. Tyrannosaurus rex grew extremely fast, even compared to other tyrannosaurs. See Horner and Padian 2004 (http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/271/1551/1875.short) and Erickson et al. 2004 (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v430/n7001/abs/nature02699.html), for example.
Additionally, Tyrannosaurus rex individuals would have varied in size at different life stages, so we would need more than two subadult individuals to determine if one or the other really fell outside the expected growth pattern.
the hiccup i was seeing was with the “5 pounds a day” figure i kept encountering. there’s a specimen called Bucky who’s around the same size as Thomas but i have been unable to find age and weight figure for the specimen. Unfortunately Tinker hasn’t been treated well (hence lack of info on specs) and all i have been able to find for the juvenile in LA’s growth series is that it’s 20 feet long (which is the size of Jane). I have emailed a couple paleontologists about this (have yet to here back). If anything, it may just T. rex grew even faster than previously thought.But i’m probably wrong, as always.
[...] post was inspired by my little debate with Brian Switek over at Dinosaur Tracking spawned by my stupid little observation. First off in [...]
Was there ANY time overlap between Tyrannosaurus and other North American tyrannosaurids (Nanotyrannus does not count)?
Gray: There may have been some overlap between Albertosaurus and Tyrannosaurus, but, as far as we currently know, Tyrannosaurus was the only tyrannosaurid in the majority of the ecosystems in which it occurred during the time it existed. I am not counting Nanotyrannus because no solid evidence has yet been found confirming that this second ‘pygmy tyrant’ actually existed. Specimens referred to Nanotyrannus are most likely juvenile Tyrannosaurus.
Sure there may have been some overlap between Albertosaurus and Tyrannosaurus but apparently not in the same environment. Upper Horseshoe canyon Albertosaurus specimens approach middle Maastrichtian age, about the same time Tyrannosaurus was evolving in SW environments. I suspect Tyrannosaurus ultimately spread into all environments and blew away the competition.