<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daemonosaurus Shakes Up the Early History of Dinosaurs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/04/daemonosaurus-shakes-up-the-early-history-of-dinosaurs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/04/daemonosaurus-shakes-up-the-early-history-of-dinosaurs/</link>
	<description>Where Paleontology Meets Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra Elmore</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/04/daemonosaurus-shakes-up-the-early-history-of-dinosaurs/comment-page-1/#comment-3989</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra Elmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 15:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=5288#comment-3989</guid>
		<description>Some time ago I found a type of limestone rock in my backyard with what looked very much like a large handprint. Over the years the reais have washed away some of the image and now it looks more like a couple of dried birdfoot prints that were frozen in time into the rock. And recently I watched a National Geographic show about ancient sky birds, so I wonder if I need to share this rock with those who are researching ancient species of flying dinosaurs. I have a photo that I can share if anyone is interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some time ago I found a type of limestone rock in my backyard with what looked very much like a large handprint. Over the years the reais have washed away some of the image and now it looks more like a couple of dried birdfoot prints that were frozen in time into the rock. And recently I watched a National Geographic show about ancient sky birds, so I wonder if I need to share this rock with those who are researching ancient species of flying dinosaurs. I have a photo that I can share if anyone is interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marco garcia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/04/daemonosaurus-shakes-up-the-early-history-of-dinosaurs/comment-page-1/#comment-3974</link>
		<dc:creator>marco garcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=5288#comment-3974</guid>
		<description>que guapo! ya soy fan del Daemonosaurus!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>que guapo! ya soy fan del Daemonosaurus!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Parker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/04/daemonosaurus-shakes-up-the-early-history-of-dinosaurs/comment-page-1/#comment-3970</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=5288#comment-3970</guid>
		<description>This brings up the question if Daemonosaurus is a juvenile, then what is it a juvenile of?  Certainly not Coelophysis,the only other theropod in the same geological member, which is already known from a good ontogentic series. In my post at Chinleana I brought up the point that we may not be able to discount a Chindesaurus-like taxon. There is a stratigraphic, and thus temporal, separation between the two forms but this does not preclude the possibility that Daemonosaurus and Chindesaurus may turn out to be closely related.  As you state, we need more fossils.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This brings up the question if Daemonosaurus is a juvenile, then what is it a juvenile of?  Certainly not Coelophysis,the only other theropod in the same geological member, which is already known from a good ontogentic series. In my post at Chinleana I brought up the point that we may not be able to discount a Chindesaurus-like taxon. There is a stratigraphic, and thus temporal, separation between the two forms but this does not preclude the possibility that Daemonosaurus and Chindesaurus may turn out to be closely related.  As you state, we need more fossils.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
