<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bringing Dinosaurs Up to Speed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/05/bringing-dinosaurs-up-to-speed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/05/bringing-dinosaurs-up-to-speed/</link>
	<description>Where Paleontology Meets Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/05/bringing-dinosaurs-up-to-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-4149</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 22:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=5460#comment-4149</guid>
		<description>Perhaps one day we will know all there is to know about dinosaur evolution, but for now, we still have to look for more clues. In this article, it is a good point that paleontologists focus too much on finding huge specimens that they lose track of finding the evolutionary journey of one specimen to another, say from an Allosaurus to a Tyrannosaurus Rex. I hope they will focus more on that genetic tree of dinosaurs more than finding the biggest fossils. We&#039;ll get there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps one day we will know all there is to know about dinosaur evolution, but for now, we still have to look for more clues. In this article, it is a good point that paleontologists focus too much on finding huge specimens that they lose track of finding the evolutionary journey of one specimen to another, say from an Allosaurus to a Tyrannosaurus Rex. I hope they will focus more on that genetic tree of dinosaurs more than finding the biggest fossils. We&#8217;ll get there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/05/bringing-dinosaurs-up-to-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-4138</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 22:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=5460#comment-4138</guid>
		<description>yep. This is what I hope to do with my museum (if i ever get it started): one more institution out there  looking for fossil so that we would have more specimens to look at. It seems that if you find a bone from the Cenozoic, you can usually assign it to a genus. But with dinosaurs, find a bone or horn or tooth and no such luck; you can only get it to the family level. That may change someday though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep. This is what I hope to do with my museum (if i ever get it started): one more institution out there  looking for fossil so that we would have more specimens to look at. It seems that if you find a bone from the Cenozoic, you can usually assign it to a genus. But with dinosaurs, find a bone or horn or tooth and no such luck; you can only get it to the family level. That may change someday though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
