Comments on: Two Views on How to Make a Baby Sauropod http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/05/two-views-on-how-to-make-a-baby-sauropod/ Where Paleontology Meets Pop Culture Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:48:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4 By: The Dinosaurs We Used to Know | Dinosaur Tracking http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/05/two-views-on-how-to-make-a-baby-sauropod/comment-page-1/#comment-4807 The Dinosaurs We Used to Know | Dinosaur Tracking Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:11:40 +0000 http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=5586#comment-4807 [...] no longer look as scientifically sacrilegious as they did when the book initially came out. Not all of Bakker’s ideas are accepted today, but the overall vision he helped promote has become entrenched. Images of slow and stupid [...] [...] no longer look as scientifically sacrilegious as they did when the book initially came out. Not all of Bakker’s ideas are accepted today, but the overall vision he helped promote has become entrenched. Images of slow and stupid [...]

]]> By: Polycotylus – The Good Mother Plesiosaur? http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/05/two-views-on-how-to-make-a-baby-sauropod/comment-page-1/#comment-4675 Polycotylus – The Good Mother Plesiosaur? Sun, 14 Aug 2011 17:31:01 +0000 http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=5586#comment-4675 [...] are no live-bearing archosaurs today, yet maybe there were in a past. Fossil justification has discredited a suspicion that dinosaurs competence have delivered live young, yet there was once a permanent and widespread organisation of entirely aquatic, sea-dwelling [...] [...] are no live-bearing archosaurs today, yet maybe there were in a past. Fossil justification has discredited a suspicion that dinosaurs competence have delivered live young, yet there was once a permanent and widespread organisation of entirely aquatic, sea-dwelling [...]

]]> By: Polycotylus – The Good Mother Plesiosaur? | InfoPromosi.com http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/05/two-views-on-how-to-make-a-baby-sauropod/comment-page-1/#comment-4671 Polycotylus – The Good Mother Plesiosaur? | InfoPromosi.com Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:08:09 +0000 http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=5586#comment-4671 [...] There are no live-bearing archosaurs today, but perhaps there were in the past. Fossil evidence has discredited the idea that dinosaurs may have delivered live young, but there was once a long-lived & widespread group of entirely aquatic, sea-dwelling crocodiles. [...] [...] There are no live-bearing archosaurs today, but perhaps there were in the past. Fossil evidence has discredited the idea that dinosaurs may have delivered live young, but there was once a long-lived & widespread group of entirely aquatic, sea-dwelling crocodiles. [...]

]]> By: Polycotylus – The Good Mother Plesiosaur? | Science Blogs and News http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/05/two-views-on-how-to-make-a-baby-sauropod/comment-page-1/#comment-4669 Polycotylus – The Good Mother Plesiosaur? | Science Blogs and News Sun, 14 Aug 2011 09:19:45 +0000 http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=5586#comment-4669 [...] There are no live-bearing archosaurs today, but perhaps there were in the past. Fossil evidence has discredited the idea that dinosaurs may have delivered live young, but there was once a long-lived and widespread group of entirely aquatic, sea-dwelling crocodiles. [...] [...] There are no live-bearing archosaurs today, but perhaps there were in the past. Fossil evidence has discredited the idea that dinosaurs may have delivered live young, but there was once a long-lived and widespread group of entirely aquatic, sea-dwelling crocodiles. [...]

]]> By: Polycotylus – The Good Mother Plesiosaur? | Science News http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/05/two-views-on-how-to-make-a-baby-sauropod/comment-page-1/#comment-4668 Polycotylus – The Good Mother Plesiosaur? | Science News Sun, 14 Aug 2011 01:22:05 +0000 http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=5586#comment-4668 [...] There are no live-bearing archosaurs today, but perhaps there were in the past. Fossil evidence has discredited the idea that dinosaurs may have delivered live young, but there was once a long-lived and widespread group of entirely aquatic, sea-dwelling crocodiles. [...] [...] There are no live-bearing archosaurs today, but perhaps there were in the past. Fossil evidence has discredited the idea that dinosaurs may have delivered live young, but there was once a long-lived and widespread group of entirely aquatic, sea-dwelling crocodiles. [...]

]]> By: Hai~Ren http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/05/two-views-on-how-to-make-a-baby-sauropod/comment-page-1/#comment-4309 Hai~Ren Fri, 03 Jun 2011 01:00:06 +0000 http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=5586#comment-4309 John: I think your statement is a misrepresentation of what Brian meant. And frankly, your insinuations about science bloggers are insulting. John: I think your statement is a misrepresentation of what Brian meant.

And frankly, your insinuations about science bloggers are insulting.

]]> By: John http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/05/two-views-on-how-to-make-a-baby-sauropod/comment-page-1/#comment-4299 John Tue, 31 May 2011 20:18:57 +0000 http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=5586#comment-4299 "Blog long enough, and it will happen eventually—someone else will get to that fascinating topic you had planned to write about before you do." ___ blogging about something before someone else does... that is not science. Why do you feel that just because you write about something first, that gives you the one up? Of course you science bloggers are the first to write about things. Because the real grad students or professionals are to busy working their tails off studying, researching for credit and in the field. They wait... and are not trying to be a "Who's on first." You could of been the first to write about this and guess what?... If a scientist wrote about years later, that would be the post that counts. I would venture to say that would be a journalistic mentality. "I wrote about it first, so mine matters... and look at me!" “Blog long enough, and it will happen eventually—someone else will get to that fascinating topic you had planned to write about before you do.” ___ blogging about something before someone else does… that is not science. Why do you feel that just because you write about something first, that gives you the one up? Of course you science bloggers are the first to write about things. Because the real grad students or professionals are to busy working their tails off studying, researching for credit and in the field. They wait… and are not trying to be a “Who’s on first.” You could of been the first to write about this and guess what?… If a scientist wrote about years later, that would be the post that counts. I would venture to say that would be a journalistic mentality. “I wrote about it first, so mine matters… and look at me!”

]]>