<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Triceratops: An A+ Dinosaur</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/06/triceratops-an-a-dinosaur/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/06/triceratops-an-a-dinosaur/</link>
	<description>Where Paleontology Meets Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albertonykus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/06/triceratops-an-a-dinosaur/comment-page-1/#comment-4345</link>
		<dc:creator>Albertonykus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=5731#comment-4345</guid>
		<description>They also claim that Triceratops had five front hooves, when no archosaur is known to have had more than three claws on each hand...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They also claim that Triceratops had five front hooves, when no archosaur is known to have had more than three claws on each hand&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/06/triceratops-an-a-dinosaur/comment-page-1/#comment-4344</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=5731#comment-4344</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Kelsey and cliff put that bunk to rest. And how does one even grade fossil species? A rather bizarre and irrelevant notion i think. But if such a thing were to be done, you and Darren Naish ought to be the ones grading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Kelsey and cliff put that bunk to rest. And how does one even grade fossil species? A rather bizarre and irrelevant notion i think. But if such a thing were to be done, you and Darren Naish ought to be the ones grading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Ford</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/06/triceratops-an-a-dinosaur/comment-page-1/#comment-4343</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 21:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=5731#comment-4343</guid>
		<description>There is a missprint in your comments, you state in a book published in 1993 talked about a Triceratops found in 1994. You are right about the skulls being the only ones that people were interested, and just adult skulls at that. The Black Hills Institute has a new nearly complete Triceratops skeleton with skin impressions. A very impressive specimen that may change our views on how Triceratops looked. There are Triceratops specimens with the horn bitten off by a Tyrannosaurus rex. Some show healing, some with tooth marks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a missprint in your comments, you state in a book published in 1993 talked about a Triceratops found in 1994. You are right about the skulls being the only ones that people were interested, and just adult skulls at that. The Black Hills Institute has a new nearly complete Triceratops skeleton with skin impressions. A very impressive specimen that may change our views on how Triceratops looked. There are Triceratops specimens with the horn bitten off by a Tyrannosaurus rex. Some show healing, some with tooth marks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Babbletrish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/06/triceratops-an-a-dinosaur/comment-page-1/#comment-4340</link>
		<dc:creator>Babbletrish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=5731#comment-4340</guid>
		<description>&quot;The fossil record is used here, one assumes, despite the fact that a complete Triceratops skeleton has never been found. This is why nobody has ever seen fit to consult paleontologists about anything that might actually matter.&quot;

Two thoughts here:

1) Gaaaah, the stupid!  It burns us!  It FREEZES us!!!

2) My homeboy Cliff would like a word with this person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The fossil record is used here, one assumes, despite the fact that a complete Triceratops skeleton has never been found. This is why nobody has ever seen fit to consult paleontologists about anything that might actually matter.&#8221;</p>
<p>Two thoughts here:</p>
<p>1) Gaaaah, the stupid!  It burns us!  It FREEZES us!!!</p>
<p>2) My homeboy Cliff would like a word with this person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/06/triceratops-an-a-dinosaur/comment-page-1/#comment-4339</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=5731#comment-4339</guid>
		<description>Good job setting the record straight.  This article has been a mini-treasure-trove of new sources of new information about something pretty cool.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job setting the record straight.  This article has been a mini-treasure-trove of new sources of new information about something pretty cool.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
