Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Dinosaur Tracking

Where paleontology meets pop culture

Hominid Hunting

Meet the members of the tangled human family tree

Innovations

How human ingenuity is changing the way we live

Surprising Science

Ideas, news and discoveries from the world of science


September 19, 2011

Return to Planet Dinosaur


With dinosaur documentaries, quantity isn’t the problem. Triceratops, Tyrannosaurus and friends have a near-constant screen presence, and this year we’ve seen plenty of new prehistoric shows of varying quality. In fact, the dinosaur media market has been so saturated lately that sometimes I get a little sick of seeing bellowing theropods go tearing after hapless hadrosaurs. I was impressed, against the background of sub-par dinosaur dramas, by the first episode of BBC One’s new miniseries Planet Dinosaur.

I’ll admit that I was initially skeptical of Planet Dinosaur. The first promotional clip made it look like yet another CGI-fest focused entirely on dinosaur carnage with not a shred of science in sight. YAWN. More than a decade since Walking With Dinosaurs, the “day in the life of a dinosaur” schtick has been done to death and probably should be buried, at least for a little while. Plus, I wasn’t particularly taken with the show’s title. We’ve already had Dinosaur Planet and, near the bottom of the bad-dinosaur-movie chum bucket, Planet of Dinosaurs, but I’m glad I didn’t let my fanboy nitpicks dissuade me from actually sitting down to see what the show as all about.

Like many other recent programs of its kind, Planet Dinosaur doesn’t skimp on the dinosaur dramatizations. Episode one—”Lost World”—primarily focuses on the feeding habits of the great, sail-backed theropod Spinosaurus. Naturally, the critter gets into plenty of scuffs with giant sawfish, the enormous crocodylomorph Sarcosuchus and the gargantuan Carcharodontosaurus. There is some uncertainty as to how many of the show’s big predators actually lived alongside one another—a problem that stems from the way in which the Late Cretaceous fossil deposits of northern Africa have been sampled—but, admittedly, creating a compelling television storyline requires a bit of flexibility in reconstruction. That said, I do appreciate that the creators of the show have intentionally picked prehistoric settings outside the Late Jurassic and Late Cretaceous of North America (which can be said of Dinosaur Revolution, as well). Everybody knows Allosaurus and Apatosaurus from the Morrison Formation and Triceratops and Tyrannosaurus from the Hell Creek Formation, but there is a whole world of dinosaurs out there that most people know little or nothing about.

What sets Planet Dinosaur apart, and what I enjoyed most, is the fact that a modicum of science is woven into each episode to back up the different vignettes being presented. When a pair of Carcharodontosaurus duke it out over territory, for example, narrator John Hurt explains how theropod skulls with punctures and tooth slashes support the idea that big predatory dinosaurs often fought by biting each other on the face, as graphic illustrations of such fossils pop up on screen. At another point, the show briefly delves into the diet of spinosaurs by citing different gut contents found inside disparate members of the group found across the globe, and the show even mentions a relatively recent geochemical study which hinted that spinosaurs were primarily living and hunting along the water’s edge. There are a few hiccups—such as the notion that the theropod Rugops was a devoted scavenger and the suggestion the Spinosaurus sliced up its prey with its formidable arms when the forelimbs of this dinosaur are entirely unknown—but despite these nitpicks, it was quite refreshing to see the show fit recent discoveries into the narrative. Documentary creators, if you’re reading, we need more of this kind of mix of narrative and science.

Marc Vincent of Love in the Time of Chasmosaurs recently posted his own review of the show, as well. While I agree that Planet Dinosaur is not that perfect dinosaur documentary that we have all been hoping for, it is still far better than just about anything that I have seen lately. We’re always going to have bloodthirsty theropods roaring and slashing at everything that moves—nature documentaries of all kinds are dominated by violence—but accepting that doesn’t mean that we have to give up on trying to educate while we entertain. Planet Dinosaur shows one way that it can be done, and I look forward to seeing the remainder of the series.



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

10 Comments »

  1. Nizar Ibrahim, PhD says:

    Hi Brian,

    I am glad to hear you enjoyed watching Planet Dinosaur.
    The first episode was largely based on my PhD thesis and extensive fieldwork I have carried out in the Kem Kem region over the last few years. There is very little doubt that the theropods shown did indeed coexist. In fact, the same theropod assemblage has also been reported from likely coeval deposits in Niger and Egypt.

    Best wishes,

    Nizar Ibrahim

  2. Henrique Niza says:

    Like I have said over LitToC blog Planet Dinosaur without a doubt is the best dinosaur related documentary since WWD. The CGI is beautiful, both on dinosaurs and environment, the science is perfectly attached to the “story” and best of all it’s good science. I actually learnt something with it!

    In short: great! Although it would probably feels less rushed if it was a 45 minutes episode rather than the old 30 minutes format.

  3. anon says:

    Just as I feared, the dinosaur CGI is good, but the scenery and especially the sky-scape looks horrid, so drab and lifeless.

  4. JP says:

    Any word on when/if this will be available in the U.S.?

  5. Dave Godfrey says:

    Sadly I wasn’t nearly as impressed as everyone else. This is possibly because I hadn’t seen Planet of the Dinosaurs or many of these other programmes. I wasn’t impressed with their statement that “Cacharodontosaurus had a weak skull”, and then promptly show them headbutting each other. The Ouranosaurus appeared to be made of rubber. WWD was definitely more convincing- the mix of animatronics and live backgrounds really helps, something Planet Dinosaur suffered from in comparison.

    The cutaways to show the fossils and explain how we know X and Y however were the best bits about the show. Its something I felt was really needed in WWD and its sequels.

    However I have now seen the first episode of Dinosaur Revolution, and thought it was absolutely terrible. Planet Dinosaur is head and shoulders above it in terms of quality.

  6. Heinrich Mallison says:

    I was involved in this as an expert – only a tiny bit, for some very few selected issues involving posture and motion of some critters. And because I haven’t seen any of the episodes I do not even know if the material I got sent to check out and give hints for improvement on ever made it into the final product.

    What I can say, however, is that the producers made a sincere and continuous effort to talk to scientists FIRST, and decide how to model things SECOND. This way, it was really possible to influence the animations, avoiding for example the eternal pronated hands we have gotten used to seeing in theropods. I even got to have telephone and video conferences with the animators, so there was no filter between the hard data input (what little I could provide) and the people responsible for turning this into a good animation.

    Overall, this is a good pattern to work with, and I hope to see more of it in the future!

  7. Marc Vincent says:

    Thanks for the mention, Brian. My review at LITC was probably a little harsh – the fact that evidence was included represented a huge step forward for dinosaur shows. It’s telling that my main problem was with the animation (although blips like the ‘scavenger Rugops’ and anachronistic Ouranosaurus were…unfortunate).

    Tomorrow night’s episode promises Gigantoraptor, the ‘largest feathered animal ever’ – which, er, probably isn’t true. Still, I look forward to it.

  8. Heinrich Mallison says:

    Marc, I tried commenting at your blog and couldn’t – so I’ll answer here: as mentioned, they tried hard to get the latest science and advice. This got, for example, rid of droopy theropod hands (except with outward rotated elbows, where the palms do point down). However, we need to realize that production processes sometimes get a bit chaotic when timelines are concerned…..

    I even had telephone conferences with the animators, with Cinesync of the videos. There was no filter between the expert and the workers, which means that no errors were introduced. And that is the way production should happen.

    Sadly, this wasn’t entirely possible for the storyline, so there is room for improvement.

    Overall, we should be happy that Peter and later Catherine found an approach that got them a better shot at having the looks, biomechanics and behaviour right. That it didn’t always work out – I’ll happily live with that!

  9. Herman Diaz says:

    @Dave Godfrey

    “I wasn’t impressed with their statement that “Cacharodontosaurus had a weak skull”, and then promptly show them headbutting each other.”

    That’s b/c its skull was weak side-to-side, but much stronger up-&-down.

  10. snakexxx says:

    I think the blood splatters are very accurate in the way of how big of a gash the carnivores inflicted. Also there isn’t to much fighting… they’re just showing how the theropods killled thier prey. Personally i like all the attacking and killing! but the show does have some minor errors… :D

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement