<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside Sauropod Armor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/11/inside-sauropod-armor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/11/inside-sauropod-armor/</link>
	<description>Where Paleontology Meets Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sclerophanax</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/11/inside-sauropod-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-5516</link>
		<dc:creator>Sclerophanax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 12:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=6804#comment-5516</guid>
		<description>Would a female Rapetosaurus have had medullary bone like birds and (other) theropods? If not, then resorption of the osteoderms might be more gender-specific, or conversely the females might have had larger osteoderms because of the need to store more minerals than males.

I also agree with Doug&#039;s idea. The large adult would probably have had less use for armor around the hip area, so those osteoderms could well have been &quot;recycled&quot; for a different use even if they were needed for protection in the young ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would a female Rapetosaurus have had medullary bone like birds and (other) theropods? If not, then resorption of the osteoderms might be more gender-specific, or conversely the females might have had larger osteoderms because of the need to store more minerals than males.</p>
<p>I also agree with Doug&#8217;s idea. The large adult would probably have had less use for armor around the hip area, so those osteoderms could well have been &#8220;recycled&#8221; for a different use even if they were needed for protection in the young ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peart &#38; associates inc</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/11/inside-sauropod-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-5513</link>
		<dc:creator>peart &#38; associates inc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=6804#comment-5513</guid>
		<description>Inside Sauropod Armor,a very interesting article. I share the same thoughts as Doug, armor function in the youth stages. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inside Sauropod Armor,a very interesting article. I share the same thoughts as Doug, armor function in the youth stages. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/11/inside-sauropod-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-5504</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 05:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=6804#comment-5504</guid>
		<description>maybe it was meant to function as armor in the juvenile stage. You said that the juvie&#039;s armor was solid. It would make some sense, since that&#039;s the time they were most vulnerable. Just more meaningless speculation on my part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe it was meant to function as armor in the juvenile stage. You said that the juvie&#8217;s armor was solid. It would make some sense, since that&#8217;s the time they were most vulnerable. Just more meaningless speculation on my part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chilly</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/11/inside-sauropod-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-5502</link>
		<dc:creator>Chilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 21:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=6804#comment-5502</guid>
		<description>A story about this was on the front page of the local Twin Cities newspaper today.  The paleontologist is from a college in St. Paul, thus the local angle.

http://www.startribune.com/local/stpaul/134725533.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A story about this was on the front page of the local Twin Cities newspaper today.  The paleontologist is from a college in St. Paul, thus the local angle.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.startribune.com/local/stpaul/134725533.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.startribune.com/local/stpaul/134725533.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heinrich Mallison</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/11/inside-sauropod-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-5501</link>
		<dc:creator>Heinrich Mallison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=6804#comment-5501</guid>
		<description>way cool! Now I just want to know if there is medullary bone to be found in sauropods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>way cool! Now I just want to know if there is medullary bone to be found in sauropods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
