December 27, 2011
A Mysterious Thumb

An articulated Iguanodon hand on display at London's Natural History Museum. Photo from Flickr user Meffi.
There is much we still don’t know about dinosaurs. In fact, some aspects of dinosaurs have puzzled paleontologists for well over a century. Among the most frustrating is why the great herbivore Iguanodon had prominent thumb spikes. Despite all the possibly explanations provided for this appendage, none are especially satisfying.
The peculiar false thumb of Iguanodon was originally thought to set into the dinosaur’s nose. When Gideon Mantell first described the animal in 1825, the various bits and pieces of the dinosaur were thought to represent the remains of an enormous, iguana-like reptile. As a result, it seemed reasonable that a conical, bony spike corresponded to the same structure on the snouts of rhinoceros iguanas. This placement made sense within the prevailing view that creatures like Iguanodon were lizards writ large, but the idea was tossed when a series of more complete Iguanodon were found in a Belgian coal mine in 1878. The “horn” actually belonged on a mitten-like hand, opposite a prehensile finger.
But why should Iguanodon have a hand spike? The most popular idea is that the dinosaur used the appendage for defense—an illustration by John Sibbick in The Book of Dinosaurs shows and Iguanodon stabbing its spike into the neck of an attacking allosaurid. The restoration looks more than a little ridiculous. In order to get within poking range, the defending Iguanodon would have to place itself right in front of its assailant, perfectly within the range of the slicing dental cutlery of the carnivore. Such maneuvers would require the attacker to hold still while being prodded. One popular-audience book suggested that the spike might house a venom gland, but there is no evidence for this and, furthermore, the Iguanodon would still have to get within biting range of the attacking theropod to use the weapon.
There are a few other speculative hypotheses. Maybe Iguanodon used the spikes in combat with one another. Or perhaps, as David Norman briefly suggested in his section on basal iguanodontia in the second edition of The Dinosauria, the spike was used for “breaking into seeds and fruits.” These are not unreasonable notions, but there is also no positive evidence to suggest that they are correct, either. The Iguanodon thumb spike is a strange specialization that must have originated for a reason. The question is whether we can test any of these ideas.
Though my own suggestion is not any better than those I have been disappointed by, I wonder if the Iguanodon spike is a Mesozoic equivalent of another false thumb seen among animals today—the enlarged wrist bones of red and giant pandas. Perhaps the Iguanodon thumb spike was an adaptation for stripping foliage from tree branches. The dinosaur could have grasped the branch with the prehensile finger, or flexed the main fingers of the palm around a bough, and run the spike down the branch to remove the greens without having to chew through the less-nutritious twigs. But this hypothesis has problems, too. The false thumbs of pandas flex so that they help the mammals grip bamboo, whereas the Iguanodon spike was rigid. And why would an Iguanodon preferentially select greener browse, especially when supplied with a formidable battery or self-replacing teeth? Furthermore, this idea is difficult to test—a preserved thumb spike wouldn’t show wear from use the same way a fossil tooth would. The Iguanodon spike was surrounded by a tough, keratinous sheath, so the actual wear wouldn’t be seen on the bone itself. A functional model of an Iguanodon hand could help investigate this idea, but even then, direct evidence would be lacking.
Perhaps there isn’t a good modern analog for the Iguanodon spikes. The bones look like they could be used for any number of things, from defense to feeding, but frustratingly, there isn’t any unambiguous indication of what they were used for or why they evolved. Perhaps, to solve this mystery, we need to go beyond the obvious and try to think like a dinosaur.
Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.
14 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI






















An interesting point! It is an odd structure, especially compared to the ‘standard’ morphology in other ornithopods. We need to find a fully articulated forelimb and manus, and then test ranges of non-linear motion etc. Or find one stuck inside a Mesozoic coconut..
Maybe they were used for reviewing movies or determining the fate of gladiators.
In seriousness, though, the evolutionary trajectory of the thumb spike is odd. Starts off small, in basal ankylopollexians, reaches its maximum in Iguanodon, then abruptly shrinks again in basal hadrosauriforms, only for the digit to be completely lost by the time hadrosaurids appear. (At least that’s my understanding of its trajectory–not sure if that’s out of date or not.)
I don’t have an answer for why it’s so large in Iguanodon, but I’ll bet figuring out its function in other ankylopollexians would shed some light.
“2.Maybe they were used for reviewing movies or determining the fate of gladiators.”
This totally needs to go on GRAWR!
“3.In seriousness, though, the evolutionary trajectory of the thumb spike is odd. Starts off small, in basal ankylopollexians, reaches its maximum in Iguanodon, then abruptly shrinks again in basal hadrosauriforms, only for the digit to be completely lost by the time hadrosaurids appear. (At least that’s my understanding of its trajectory–not sure if that’s out of date or not.)”
Actually, that might actually point to something. In many groups of horned mammals like brontotheres and deer, basal forms have large canine teeth used for intraspecific combat (and also defense). But once horns start showing up, the canine teeth become less and less prominent, until they are completely lost altogether. Perhaps this is what occured in iguanodontians. The thumb-spike functioned as some sort of intraspecific combat weapon (perhaps akin to the spurs of male chickens), and then as flashy crests and vocalization began to become more prominent the thumb spike starts shrinking and eventually vanishes.
Maybe, its purpose was for some sort of grooming.
I know that this might be far-fetched. But, some animals have adaptations for grooming.
What’s “GRAWR!”?
Interesting about the brotothere and ruminant parallels.
Come to think of it, the hadrosauriform Ouranosaurus has a (secondarily?) small thumb spike, and a rather prominent display(?) structure, although it’s a dorsal sail rather than a head crest.
This doesn’t quite explain all those hadrosaurs with no cranial ornamentation (including many basal forms), though. But it’s an interesting angle, nonetheless.
“What’s “GRAWR!”?”
It is googleable, that’s what it is. Also fun, when you locate it – take a gander at Ed Young’s birfday cakez.
Okay, I give, it is a twitter # tag. Dunno what it stands for, but it looks to be a result of a Switek – Young mock fight.
Quite obviously, those thumbs were designed for eviscerating and obliterating obnoxious bloggers!
Just FYI for testing these hypotheses – trabecular bone will align with principle axes of loading. Look at the inside of a femur for an excellent example. If the trabeculae show no alignment, it must’ve been exposed to minimal forces, while alignment will show whether it was loaded in shear, compression, bending, etc. A good mini-CT scan should work, or a micro-CT with a large bore.
He stuck in his thumb, and pulled out a plum, and said what a good dinosaur am I?
Seriously, it would be nice to know what the critter was eating. Its hands are so interesting, with the thumb spike on one side and another thumb on the other – an opposable pinkie? It was doing something really interesting with its hands.
“The peculiar false thumb of Iguanodon”
Wait, is it really a false thumb, i.e. modified carpals like that of a panda? I always assumed it was a modified digit I.
It IS a modified digit I.
I’m thinking it probably was a weapon. It is true that Iguanodon would have to be within biting range to use it but, it surely wasn´t running after theropods to stab them!- it would have used its thumb spike as a desperate measure once the theropod had already caught him!
Just like platypus will only stab when caught, they always prefer to swim away. Why would Iguanodon be any different?