Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Dinosaur Tracking

Where paleontology meets pop culture

Hominid Hunting

Meet the members of the tangled human family tree

Innovations

How human ingenuity is changing the way we live

Surprising Science

Ideas, news and discoveries from the world of science


December 28, 2011

How to Turn a Dinosaur Into a Bird

Since Jack Horner and James Gorman’s book How to Build a Dinosaur debuted almost three years ago, periodic lectures, interviews and articles have piqued the public’s curiosity about reverse-engineering a non-avian dinosaur from an avian one. Perhaps a “chickenosaurus” isn’t as outlandish as it sounds.

The possibility of creating a long-tailed chicken with teeth and claws is based on the fact that birds are living dinosaurs. A relatively minimal amount of tinkering could turn a bird into something like its non-avian ancestors. But, during the dinomania of the late 1980s and early 1990s, the idea that birds were derived from dinosaurs was still something that made people tilt their heads and say “What?” Rather than focus on efforts to turn birds into something akin to a dromaeosaur, dinosaur documentaries envisioned the real evolutionary changes by which one lineage of non-avian dinosaurs were adapted into early birds. Even better, two shows animated this change.

Within the array of Mesozoic programming from the early 1990s, one of my favorite shows was The Dinosaurs! This four-part PBS miniseries featured scientists investigating the details of dinosaur lives, and different prehistoric vignettes were presented in colorful animated sequences. The one that stuck with me most powerfully was a short scene about the origin of birds. A small, green dinosaur akin to Compsognathus runs through a forest, but when the theropod pauses on a branch it rapidly grows feathers. In an instant the small coelurosaur changed into Archaeopteryx. The 19th century naturalist Thomas Henry Huxley was absolutely right when he imagined that, when clothed in feathers, a dinosaur like Compsognathus would look little different from archaic birds.

But a similar clip from an earlier, 1989 episode of the series The Infinite Voyage is even better. The episode, “The Great Dinosaur Hunt,” is an excellent snapshot of how perspectives on dinosaurs were changing in the wake of the “Dinosaur Renaissance,” and the program included a similar coelurosaur-to-bird transformation. This time, though, the change starts with a fuzzy, feather-covered dromaeosaurid similar to the sickle-clawed Deinonychus. Rather than focus on the outside of the dinosaur, though, the show gives viewers an animated X-ray view as the skull, arms, shoulders, legs and hips are gradually modified in a transition through Archaeopteryx and modern birds. The change didn’t happen exactly like this—Deinonychus was a larger dinosaur that lived millions of years after Archaeopteryx—but different anatomies represent the general pattern of the evolutionary change.

I still have a fondness for those animations. Part of that affinity is probably due to nostalgia, but I also think that they beautifully illustrate a point that is often taken for granted now. The fact that birds are modern dinosaurs is reiterated in books, museum displays, CGI-ridden documentaries and blogs, but rarely do we see the transitional changes actually laid out in front of us. Both animations could use some updates, but they still vibrantly encapsulate one of the most fantastic transitions in the history of life on earth.



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

5 Comments »

  1. Matthew Platte says:

    What does “belief” have to do with the story of dinosaur > bird?

  2. charles222 says:

    Well, this post of mine is pretty silly, but I bet chickenosaurus, when it finally hatches, turns out to be a fairly imposing predator. My mother in law has a clutch of hens and a rooster, and that rooster is about the worst-tempered animal I’ve had the displeasure of meeting. It’s super-territorial and afraid of nothing.

  3. Francine says:

    A “relatively minimal amount of tinkering”?

    There’s a mere 4% difference in the DNA of chimpanzees vs. humans. Does this mean that with an extremely minimal amount of tinkering – substantially less than is proposed for this dino-bird project – we could make revive the long-lost ancestor of both primates???

    I think, more likely, someone hasn’t done their genome homework.

  4. Jonathan says:

    @ Francine. That would be true if there was that much difference between birds and dinosaurs, but alas birds are not the descendants of dinosaurs they ARE dinosaurs. Chickens are much much closer to maniraptora than we are to chimps. All these biologists are doing is repressing atavistic traits that already exist. So really there is hardly anything being tinkered with at all. The experiments have already been completed by Horner, Garmon, Laarson, and Abzhanov on individual traits in chicks (which were not allowed to hatch). Now if we can only combine their efforts and hatch the thing.

  5. J.P.S says:

    Creating a dinosaur from a bird a brilliant idea however to make the experiment as real as possible you would also have to turn on the predatory gene as well as the teeth,arms and tail.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement