<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dinosaur Division is All in the Hips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/01/dinosaur-division-is-all-in-the-hips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/01/dinosaur-division-is-all-in-the-hips/</link>
	<description>Where Paleontology Meets Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 'Dr'. S Beckmann, BS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/01/dinosaur-division-is-all-in-the-hips/comment-page-1/#comment-5774</link>
		<dc:creator>'Dr'. S Beckmann, BS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=7104#comment-5774</guid>
		<description>Pluto was once a planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pluto was once a planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina Wilsdon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/01/dinosaur-division-is-all-in-the-hips/comment-page-1/#comment-5773</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina Wilsdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=7104#comment-5773</guid>
		<description>Seeley had no idea how confusing he&#039;d make it for preschool dinosaur fans in the early 1960s. I still have the dinosaur book I read avidly growing up, and remember how confused I was about the hip bones, especially since the diagrams never showed you which way the dinosaur&#039;s head was and which way the tail was...there were always just these free-floating pelvic structures. I remember just deciding that they named the &quot;bird-hipped dinosaurs&quot; because the ornithischian hip looked a little bit like a bird&#039;s head (with the pubis and ischium forming the beak)...then satisfying myself that this must be so because it also looked like a duckbill&#039;s head. I guess dino-steeped preschoolers would have done well as scientists back in the day of the &quot;doctrine of signatures&quot; type of healing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeley had no idea how confusing he&#8217;d make it for preschool dinosaur fans in the early 1960s. I still have the dinosaur book I read avidly growing up, and remember how confused I was about the hip bones, especially since the diagrams never showed you which way the dinosaur&#8217;s head was and which way the tail was&#8230;there were always just these free-floating pelvic structures. I remember just deciding that they named the &#8220;bird-hipped dinosaurs&#8221; because the ornithischian hip looked a little bit like a bird&#8217;s head (with the pubis and ischium forming the beak)&#8230;then satisfying myself that this must be so because it also looked like a duckbill&#8217;s head. I guess dino-steeped preschoolers would have done well as scientists back in the day of the &#8220;doctrine of signatures&#8221; type of healing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Martyniuk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/01/dinosaur-division-is-all-in-the-hips/comment-page-1/#comment-5772</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Martyniuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=7104#comment-5772</guid>
		<description>@Jon Tennant
As groups above the rank of family, the ICZN has no say about names like Ornithischia and Ornithopoda. Their continued use is just a matter of convention. The ICPN, which will govern all taxonomic names above genus and species, is another story, but it&#039;s unlikely they&#039;ll change such well-established names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jon Tennant<br />
As groups above the rank of family, the ICZN has no say about names like Ornithischia and Ornithopoda. Their continued use is just a matter of convention. The ICPN, which will govern all taxonomic names above genus and species, is another story, but it&#8217;s unlikely they&#8217;ll change such well-established names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Tennant</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/01/dinosaur-division-is-all-in-the-hips/comment-page-1/#comment-5771</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Tennant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=7104#comment-5771</guid>
		<description>I wonder if someone could actually petition the ICZN about this. It&#039;s weird too for Ornithopoda - &quot;bird foot&quot;..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if someone could actually petition the ICZN about this. It&#8217;s weird too for Ornithopoda &#8211; &#8220;bird foot&#8221;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
