<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judging a Dinosaur By its Cover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/02/judging-a-dinosaur-by-its-cover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/02/judging-a-dinosaur-by-its-cover/</link>
	<description>Where Paleontology Meets Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/02/judging-a-dinosaur-by-its-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-5891</link>
		<dc:creator>C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=7226#comment-5891</guid>
		<description>:/ I think I didn´t explain myself correctly. I know what a Parasaurolophus and a Saurolophus are, what I was trying to say is that this particular image of the Saurolophus looks more Parasaurolophus-like than others I&#039;ve seen before (the crest and all) and I was wondering if there had been new discoveries that inspired this picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:/ I think I didn´t explain myself correctly. I know what a Parasaurolophus and a Saurolophus are, what I was trying to say is that this particular image of the Saurolophus looks more Parasaurolophus-like than others I&#8217;ve seen before (the crest and all) and I was wondering if there had been new discoveries that inspired this picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Switek</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/02/judging-a-dinosaur-by-its-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-5876</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Switek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=7226#comment-5876</guid>
		<description>C.: That might look like a Parasaurlophus, but it&#039;s actually a different crested hadrosaur called Saurolophus. There are complete skulls known for both - Parasaurolophus had a more elongated crest with large nasal tubes running through the crest, whereas the two species of Saurolophus had more of a spike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C.: That might look like a Parasaurlophus, but it&#8217;s actually a different crested hadrosaur called Saurolophus. There are complete skulls known for both &#8211; Parasaurolophus had a more elongated crest with large nasal tubes running through the crest, whereas the two species of Saurolophus had more of a spike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/02/judging-a-dinosaur-by-its-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-5874</link>
		<dc:creator>C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=7226#comment-5874</guid>
		<description>That looks an awful lot like a Parasaurolophus! What&#039;s up with the crest? Did they find a more complete one or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That looks an awful lot like a Parasaurolophus! What&#8217;s up with the crest? Did they find a more complete one or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
