February 21, 2012
The Biggest Dinosaur Ever, Or Not
![]()

A graphic comparing the largest sauropods. The red giant in the back represents the estimated size of Amphicoelias (the blue speck to the lower left is a human for scale). By DinoGuy2, from Wikipedia.
My friend and fellow science writer Ed Yong recently met the biggest mammal of all time. During a trip to Sri Lanka, Ed was able to get quite close to some blue whales—the most massive animals on earth. But are they the largest animals ever? When I tweeted Ed’s story, noting that he met the most immense mammal that has ever lived, Ed picked up that I specified the blue whale as the largest mammal ever, rather than the largest animal. “Are you hedging your bets for a sauropod?” he asked. Well, yes and no.
As sauropod expert Matt Wedel once pointed out, there are two “semi-apocryphal” dinosaurs that may have been significantly larger than the biggest whales. One of these is a legend among paleontologists. In 1878, paleontologist Edward Drinker Cope named the 150-million-year-old dinosaur Amphicoelias fragillimus on the basis of a huge but partial piece of a vertebra called a neural spine. By itself, this fragment reportedly measured almost five feet high. The dinosaur it belonged to must have been absolutely gigantic. We may never know. The bone was lost, and efforts to locate additional bones of the dinosaur have failed. From the description of the single scrap, paleontologist Ken Carpenter estimated that the dinosaur may have been 190 feet long. This would make Amphicoelias about twice as long as the longest known sauropods, but without additional fossils from this titan, estimating Amphicoelias‘ size requires speculation.
But there’s another dinosaur that may have outstripped whales. Or maybe not. Bruhathkayosaurus, a more recent contender for largest dinosaur, also has a tortured history. The dinosaur was named in 1989 on the basis of limb, hip and backbone elements found in the 70-million-year-old strata of India. At first, the remains seemed to represent one of the biggest predatory dinosaurs of all time, but paleontologists later recognized that the bones had come from a sauropod. These bones might indicate a dinosaur even larger than the roughly 100 foot long Argentinosaurus—the creature often cited as being the current record-holder for the biggest dinosaur of all time.
Despite being discovered just a few decades ago, however, the size and characteristics of Bruhathkayosaurus are almost as mysterious as those of Amphicoelias. The original description represents all that is known about this dinosaur, and as far as I am aware, no one has formally published a reexamination of the dinosaur’s skeleton. Informal estimates have placed this dinosaur at between 90 and 145 feet long, with weight estimates varying as well.
For the moment, the biggest confirmed dinosaurs all seem to fall around the same upper limit: around 100 feet long. Whether any species grew considerably bigger than this remains to be seen. The fact that so many dinosaurs seem to fall around this length might indicate that it represented the rough upper boundary for sauropod size, yet huge sauropods are so rare that it is difficult to say whether this is real or a factor of sampling and estimation techniques.
So are blue whales the biggest animals ever? In terms of mass, almost certainly yes. The biggest whales weigh more than 200 tons, and as Matt Wedel pointed out in his post on this mammal vs. dinosaur competition, even fairly liberal mass estimates for the biggest dinosaurs don’t come close to this. But dinosaurs may have whales beat when it comes to length. Supersaurus—one of the many confirmed giants—might have been a little longer than the 110 foot benchmark set by whales, and perhaps Amphicoelias was even longer. If only someone could find a good skeleton of such a giant.
Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.
7 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI






















Considering that a lot of specimens far more complete than either Amphicoelias fragillimus and Bruhathkayosaurus are often overestimated (carcharodontosaurs and “Seismosaurus” come to mind) I would be actually surprised if either of the two sauropods come near the 100 feet mark.
Hi Brian,
Good write-up. Unfortunately, Bruhathkayosaurus shares a third characteristic with Amphicoelias in addition to being giant and incomplete: the original fossils have now been lost. Evidently they were being stored under tarps out behind the rural museum where they were curated and washed away during a flood. As far as I know, in the slightly more than two decades that the Bruhathkayosaurus material was available for study, no orthogonal photographs or detailed measurements were taken; at least, none have ever been published. Call it the curse of the gigapods.
So in fact the answer to the question, “How big were the biggest sauropods?” is “We can’t say for sure anymore.”
Best,
Matt
Henrique,
You are certainly right that there is a plague of overestimation when it comes to dinosaur size. But you are certainly wrong in disputing that the two Brian discusses here reached 100 feet in length. They were both much bigger than that, by any reasonably estimate. For more detail on this, see How big was Amphicoelias fragillimus? I mean, really?.
Hello Mike,
I meant the 100 tons mark but either way you’re absolutely right like that article shows. Curiously, I even remember reading the article but after so much reading sometimes things start to overlap each other.
I appreciated the reminder. Thank you!
If we’re measuring by length, then both sauropods and whales are beaten out by… a ribbon worm! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bootlace_worm
Length isn’t a particularly good proxy for “size” in many cases. Nobody would say a python is “bigger” than an elephant, though they can grow much longer.
Why does everyone seem so sure that there weren`t any other gigantic whales in prehistoric times rivalling or even outsizing the modern blue?
I agree with the comment by C. There may have been whales in the past that were even bigger than blue whales. It’s certainly possible, in the ocean.