<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ankylosaur Reef</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/05/ankylosaur-reef/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/05/ankylosaur-reef/</link>
	<description>Where Paleontology Meets Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boesse</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/05/ankylosaur-reef/comment-page-1/#comment-6311</link>
		<dc:creator>Boesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 12:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=7807#comment-6311</guid>
		<description>Horner&#039;s first article on dinosaurs from the bearpaw shale indicated that, at the time, there were more nodosaurids known from marine deposits than terrestrial, and they constituted the most abundantly known dinosaur taxon preserved within marine strata.

Interestingly - the carlsbad ankylosaur is not only encrusted by serpulid worms and oysters, but also has hollowed-out limb bones, which the original authors (Coombs and Demere 1996) argued was taphonomic rather than natural, as no other ankylosaurs are known to possess hollow limb bones.

Although one can certainly view this as a case of information loss - it is a far more interesting case, taphonomically speaking. We know that after skeletonization, the bones were colonized - and that the preserved portion of the skeleton was not substantially disarticulated during this period of time, which is surprising given that it was exposed on the seafloor long enough to host relatively large encrusting bivalves. This subject is of keen interest for me, as I just submitted a manuscript over the weekend documenting barnacle colonization of fossil sea lion bones.

Lastly - a friend of mine who was a former SDSU student affectionately referred to this specimen as the &quot;ankylosaur ass&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horner&#8217;s first article on dinosaurs from the bearpaw shale indicated that, at the time, there were more nodosaurids known from marine deposits than terrestrial, and they constituted the most abundantly known dinosaur taxon preserved within marine strata.</p>
<p>Interestingly &#8211; the carlsbad ankylosaur is not only encrusted by serpulid worms and oysters, but also has hollowed-out limb bones, which the original authors (Coombs and Demere 1996) argued was taphonomic rather than natural, as no other ankylosaurs are known to possess hollow limb bones.</p>
<p>Although one can certainly view this as a case of information loss &#8211; it is a far more interesting case, taphonomically speaking. We know that after skeletonization, the bones were colonized &#8211; and that the preserved portion of the skeleton was not substantially disarticulated during this period of time, which is surprising given that it was exposed on the seafloor long enough to host relatively large encrusting bivalves. This subject is of keen interest for me, as I just submitted a manuscript over the weekend documenting barnacle colonization of fossil sea lion bones.</p>
<p>Lastly &#8211; a friend of mine who was a former SDSU student affectionately referred to this specimen as the &#8220;ankylosaur ass&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/05/ankylosaur-reef/comment-page-1/#comment-6301</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 01:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=7807#comment-6301</guid>
		<description>@ Anthony: interesting. I have heard here and there that perhaps the reason armored dinosaurs are more common in marine strata is because they may have favored habitats around rivers, thus increasing the chance that they could get swept out to sea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Anthony: interesting. I have heard here and there that perhaps the reason armored dinosaurs are more common in marine strata is because they may have favored habitats around rivers, thus increasing the chance that they could get swept out to sea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Maltese</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/05/ankylosaur-reef/comment-page-1/#comment-6298</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Maltese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 16:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=7807#comment-6298</guid>
		<description>Strangely, the most common dinosaur in the Niobrara chalk is also a nodosaur. There might be something to the hypothesis that their armored skin helps them &quot;stay together&quot; longer, enabling them to &quot;bloat and float&quot; for greater distances (they wind up on the ocean floor up to 200 miles from the nearest shoreline). This may also be the reason we get the occasional (but exceptopnally rare) gar that far out too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strangely, the most common dinosaur in the Niobrara chalk is also a nodosaur. There might be something to the hypothesis that their armored skin helps them &#8220;stay together&#8221; longer, enabling them to &#8220;bloat and float&#8221; for greater distances (they wind up on the ocean floor up to 200 miles from the nearest shoreline). This may also be the reason we get the occasional (but exceptopnally rare) gar that far out too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
