<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baby Dinosaur Mystery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/07/baby-dinosaur-mystery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/07/baby-dinosaur-mystery/</link>
	<description>Where Paleontology Meets Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herman Diaz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/07/baby-dinosaur-mystery/comment-page-1/#comment-6699</link>
		<dc:creator>Herman Diaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=8157#comment-6699</guid>
		<description>&quot;The baby dromaeosaurids could have been the prey of adult oviraptorosaurs, might have been trying to prey on oviraptorosaur eggs, or, after death, could have been transported a short distance into in oviraptorosaur nest.&quot;

Probably the latter ( http://dml.cmnh.org/2011Jul/msg00114.html ). Also, we now know that they were troodontids (Probably Byronosaurus), not dromaeosaurids. Otherwise, good blog post as usual.

&quot;In 1993, fieldwork at another Gobi Desert site uncovered similar eggs, and, fortuitously, same of the eggs preserved the delicate skeletons of near-term embryos.&#039;

When you said &quot;same&quot;, I think you meant &quot;some&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The baby dromaeosaurids could have been the prey of adult oviraptorosaurs, might have been trying to prey on oviraptorosaur eggs, or, after death, could have been transported a short distance into in oviraptorosaur nest.&#8221;</p>
<p>Probably the latter ( <a href="http://dml.cmnh.org/2011Jul/msg00114.html" rel="nofollow">http://dml.cmnh.org/2011Jul/msg00114.html</a> ). Also, we now know that they were troodontids (Probably Byronosaurus), not dromaeosaurids. Otherwise, good blog post as usual.</p>
<p>&#8220;In 1993, fieldwork at another Gobi Desert site uncovered similar eggs, and, fortuitously, same of the eggs preserved the delicate skeletons of near-term embryos.&#8217;</p>
<p>When you said &#8220;same&#8221;, I think you meant &#8220;some&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james robins</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/07/baby-dinosaur-mystery/comment-page-1/#comment-6694</link>
		<dc:creator>james robins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 23:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=8157#comment-6694</guid>
		<description>I may be wrong but wasn&#039;t it the case that troodontid eggs were found in association with Maiasaur nest sites, OK not in the same nests, but adjacent.....J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may be wrong but wasn&#8217;t it the case that troodontid eggs were found in association with Maiasaur nest sites, OK not in the same nests, but adjacent&#8230;..J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/07/baby-dinosaur-mystery/comment-page-1/#comment-6691</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 20:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=8157#comment-6691</guid>
		<description>One thing to note: these specimens were subsequently identified as troodontid perinates, not dromaeosaurids:

Bever, G.S. &amp; M.A. Norell. 2009). The Perinate Skull of Byronosaurus (Troodontidae) with Observations on the Cranial Ontogeny of Paravian Theropods. &lt;i&gt;American Museum Novitates&lt;/i&gt; &lt;b&gt;3657&lt;b&gt;:1-52. 

http://dx.doi.org/10.1206/650.1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing to note: these specimens were subsequently identified as troodontid perinates, not dromaeosaurids:</p>
<p>Bever, G.S. &amp; M.A. Norell. 2009). The Perinate Skull of Byronosaurus (Troodontidae) with Observations on the Cranial Ontogeny of Paravian Theropods. <i>American Museum Novitates</i> <b>3657</b><b>:1-52. </p>
<p><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1206/650.1" rel="nofollow">http://dx.doi.org/10.1206/650.1</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Martyniuk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/07/baby-dinosaur-mystery/comment-page-1/#comment-6689</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Martyniuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=8157#comment-6689</guid>
		<description>This mystery may have been solved, though not published yet (but seeing as how it&#039;s already been discussed on the DML...):
http://dml.cmnh.org/2011Jul/msg00114.html

Additionally, while the original paper described these as dromaeosaurid embryos/hatchlings, a later paper identified them as skulls of perinate troodontids, specifically Byronosaurus jaffei.

Bever, G.S. and Norell, M.A. (2009). &quot;The perinate skull of Byronosaurus (Troodontidae) with observations on the cranial ontogeny of paravian theropods.&quot; American Museum Novitates, 3657: 51 pp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This mystery may have been solved, though not published yet (but seeing as how it&#8217;s already been discussed on the DML&#8230;):<br />
<a href="http://dml.cmnh.org/2011Jul/msg00114.html" rel="nofollow">http://dml.cmnh.org/2011Jul/msg00114.html</a></p>
<p>Additionally, while the original paper described these as dromaeosaurid embryos/hatchlings, a later paper identified them as skulls of perinate troodontids, specifically Byronosaurus jaffei.</p>
<p>Bever, G.S. and Norell, M.A. (2009). &#8220;The perinate skull of Byronosaurus (Troodontidae) with observations on the cranial ontogeny of paravian theropods.&#8221; American Museum Novitates, 3657: 51 pp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albertonykus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/07/baby-dinosaur-mystery/comment-page-1/#comment-6688</link>
		<dc:creator>albertonykus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=8157#comment-6688</guid>
		<description>I think said &quot;dromaeosaurid&quot; hatchlings have been &lt;a href=&quot;http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/handle/2246/5980&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;reassigned&lt;/a&gt; to the troodont &lt;i&gt;Byronosaurus&lt;/i&gt;.

Additionally, there is reportedly &lt;a href=&quot;http://dml.cmnh.org/2011Jul/msg00114.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;unpublished evidence&lt;/a&gt; that the troodont hatchlings tumbled into the &lt;i&gt;Citipati&lt;/i&gt; nest from higher ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think said &#8220;dromaeosaurid&#8221; hatchlings have been <a href="http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/handle/2246/5980" rel="nofollow">reassigned</a> to the troodont <i>Byronosaurus</i>.</p>
<p>Additionally, there is reportedly <a href="http://dml.cmnh.org/2011Jul/msg00114.html" rel="nofollow">unpublished evidence</a> that the troodont hatchlings tumbled into the <i>Citipati</i> nest from higher ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
