<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Domed Dinosaurs Grew Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/08/how-domed-dinosaurs-grew-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/08/how-domed-dinosaurs-grew-up/</link>
	<description>Where Paleontology Meets Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Martyniuk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/08/how-domed-dinosaurs-grew-up/comment-page-1/#comment-6862</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Martyniuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=8292#comment-6862</guid>
		<description>Has anyone suggested that it was only the bony cores of the spikes being resorbed, and that the keratin covering remained the same size or even grew larger? I could imagine this being a weight-saving adaptation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone suggested that it was only the bony cores of the spikes being resorbed, and that the keratin covering remained the same size or even grew larger? I could imagine this being a weight-saving adaptation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/08/how-domed-dinosaurs-grew-up/comment-page-1/#comment-6852</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=8292#comment-6852</guid>
		<description>If the were butting heads as adults, isn&#039;t it likely that the spikes would get broken off anyway?  So it makes sense to lose them, though it doesn&#039;t explain why juveniles would have them in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the were butting heads as adults, isn&#8217;t it likely that the spikes would get broken off anyway?  So it makes sense to lose them, though it doesn&#8217;t explain why juveniles would have them in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/08/how-domed-dinosaurs-grew-up/comment-page-1/#comment-6851</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=8292#comment-6851</guid>
		<description>You neglected to mention that though Schott and Evans found resorption pits in the older Stegoceras individuals and a similar pattern of nodes across individuals, they also found that the hypothesized change in the temporal fenestrae in Goodwin and Horner&#039;s paper was not observed in Stegoceras. Additionally, the authors noted that the growth of Stegoceras does not undergo the extreme shifts in ontogeny that have been hypothesized for Dracorex/Stygimoloch/Pachycephalosaurus, the growth of the squamosals and nodes/horns in Stegoceras remaining isometric through life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You neglected to mention that though Schott and Evans found resorption pits in the older Stegoceras individuals and a similar pattern of nodes across individuals, they also found that the hypothesized change in the temporal fenestrae in Goodwin and Horner&#8217;s paper was not observed in Stegoceras. Additionally, the authors noted that the growth of Stegoceras does not undergo the extreme shifts in ontogeny that have been hypothesized for Dracorex/Stygimoloch/Pachycephalosaurus, the growth of the squamosals and nodes/horns in Stegoceras remaining isometric through life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
