Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Dinosaur Tracking

Where paleontology meets pop culture

Hominid Hunting

Meet the members of the tangled human family tree

Innovations

How human ingenuity is changing the way we live

Surprising Science

Ideas, news and discoveries from the world of science


August 2, 2012

The Double Dinosaur Brain Myth

Contrary to a popular myth, Stegosaurus did not a have a butt brain. Photo by the author at the Utah Field House of Natural History in Vernal, Utah.

There’s no shortage of dinosaur myths. Paleontologist Dave Hone recently compiled a list of eight persistent falsehoods over at the Guardian–from the misapprehension that all dinosaurs were huge to the untenable idea that Tyrannosaurus could only scavenge its meals–but there was one particular misunderstanding that caught my attention. For decades, popular articles and books claimed that the armor-plated Stegosaurus and the biggest of the sauropod dinosaurs had second brains in their rumps. These dinosaurs, it was said, could reason “a posteriori” thanks to the extra mass of tissue. It was a cute idea, but a totally wrong hypothesis that actually underscores a different dinosaur mystery.

Dinosaur brain expert Emily Buchholtz outlined the double brain issue in the newly-published second edition of The Complete Dinosaur. The idea stems from the work of 19th-century Yale paleontologist Othniel Charles Marsh. In an assessment of the sauropod Camarasaurus, Marsh noticed that the canal in the vertebrae over the dinosaur’s hips enlarged into an expanded canal that was larger than the cavity for the dinosaur’s brain. “This is a most suggestive fact,” he wrote, and, according to Buchholtz, in 1881 Marsh described a similar expansion in the neural canal of Stegosaurus as “a posterior braincase.”

Sauropods and stegosaurs seemed like the perfect candidates for butt brains. These huge dinosaurs seemed to have pitiful brain sizes compared to the rest of their body, and a second brain–or similar organ–could have helped coordinate their back legs and tails. Alternatively, the second brain was sometimes cast as a kind of junction box, speeding up signals from the back half of the body up to the primary brain. That is, if such an organ actually existed. As paleontologists now know, no dinosaur had a second brain.

There are two intertwined issues here. The first is that many dinosaurs had noticeable expansions of their spinal cords around their limbs–a feature that left its mark in the size of the neural canal in the vertebrae. This isn’t unusual. As biologists have discovered by studying living species, the enlargement of the spinal cord in the area around the limbs means that there was a greater amount of nervous system tissue in this area, and dinosaurs with larger expansions around the forelimb, for example, probably used their arms more often than dinosaurs without the same kind of enlargement. The expansion of the neural canal can give us some indication about dinosaur movement and behavior.

But the so-called “sacral brain” is something different. So far, this distinct kind of cavity is only seen in stegosaurs and sauropods and is different than the typical expansion of the neural canal. There was something else, other than nerves, filling that space. Frustratingly, though, we don’t really know what that something is.

At the moment, the most promising idea is that the space was similar to a feature in the hips of birds called the glycogen body. As sauropod expert Matt Wedel has pointed out, this space stores energy-rich glycogen in the hips. Perhaps this was true for the sauropods and stegosaurs, too. Again, though, we hit a snag. We don’t really know what the glycogen body does in birds–whether it helps with balance, is a storehouse for nutritious compounds that are drawn upon at specific times or something else. Even if we assume that the expansion in dinosaurs was a glycogen body, we don’t yet know what biological role the feature played. Dinosaurs didn’t have hindbrains, but the significant spaces in the hips of stegosaurs and sauropods still puzzle paleontologists.



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

9 Comments »

  1. Debi Linton says:

    The hindbrain is one of those myths that gets more publicity in the debunking than it does in the believing these days, and I think that needs to stop.

    I recently taught a group of 2nd and 3rd graders in summer school at the AMNH. The Stegosaurus skeleton there includes a label that says “Did Stegosaurs Have Two Brains?” The small text underneath explains that no, they didn’t, and that the expansion in the spinal column is shared by elephants. But the children, in their rush to get information rather than read and comprehend labels, thought that this means that stegosaurs AND ELEPHANTS had two brains.

    (The label does not mention the uniqueness of stegosaurs)

    (This hurried reading of labels is how most visitors, of all ages, read museum labels – title and picture give the initial impression, and the small text if they have time, and children generally don’t.)

    They’d never heard of this idea until they saw it in the AMNH, and then it took some work to point out what the label was actually saying.

    This is actually a deviation from the topic of this post: The hindbrain myth is an interesting factor in discussing the sacral expansion. But this recent experience suggested to me that we need to be careful about when and how we deliberately introduce misconceptions into people’s minds.

  2. Cal says:

    Every time I hear about the two brains theory, I revisit this poem:
    http://www.futilitycloset.com/2012/06/26/second-thoughts-2/

  3. Nick says:

    I am old enough to remember my plastic model dinosaurs where the packaging described the Stegosaurus as having two brains. It was presented as standard common knowledge about this beast.

  4. Carl says:

    Well, it only goes to show that dinosaurs weren’t “smart asses”:):)

    But, being serious here, we most likely won’t ever really know what the extra large cavity in the stegosaurs and other sauropods was for, except by inference via birds. The only way we could be for certain is to go back in a time machine and check them out first hand, but that won’t be happening anytime soon.

  5. Matt P says:

    Interesting! This is one of the myths that I’d believed until now…I remember a VHS I had as a kid that explained the hindbrain idea by showing a stick of dynamite on an brachiosaur’s tail. It tried to show that it would take too long for the stimulus to travel all the way to the dinosaur’s brain, so the ‘buttbrain’ (love the term!) ensured he could flick his tail in time.

    That was a weird video…

    Thank you for fixing my ignorance on this matter!

  6. rusty says:

    “There was something else, other than nerves, filling that space.” You’d be more convincing if you supplied some, you know, evidence.

  7. JTof CO says:

    Very unprofessional article.
    It was NOT a MYTH it was a THEORY!!!!

    To call disproven theories falsehoods and myths is a disgrace.

    Shame on you.

  8. Stevo Darkly says:

    ^The heck? Mr. Pill, please meet my friend, Mr. Chill.

    What are you on about? If a theory has been shown to be untenable, yet many people continue to popularly believe it is true, then it certainly meets one definition of a “myth” as commonly used — a story or alleged “fact” that is widely believed but untrue.

    I remembered reading as a kid that stegosaurs and sauropods had neural ganglia at their hips that acted as a kind of auxiliary brain — making “decisions” to react to stimuli that reached them long before the impulses could reach the real brain. Seemed to make sense to me. Ever since, I thought this was a settled thing. I had no conception that this idea had been discarded.

    One of the things I like about Brian Switek’s blog posts (and his book Written in Stone) is that I, even with a lifelong and continuing interest in animals (especially dinosaurs), still end up learning something new and unexpected whenever I read them.

    Great article as usual.

  9. cory says:

    Stegosaurus is my favourite Dinosaur. I always hated the negatives surrounding this power peacock of a beast.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement