<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Did Plant-Munching Theropods Get So Big?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/11/why-did-plant-munching-theropods-get-so-big/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/11/why-did-plant-munching-theropods-get-so-big/</link>
	<description>Where Paleontology Meets Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franciscos Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/11/why-did-plant-munching-theropods-get-so-big/comment-page-1/#comment-7292</link>
		<dc:creator>Franciscos Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 16:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=8885#comment-7292</guid>
		<description>Soory to hear you go :( I really enjoy your post everyday ... hope you continue in a new blog :D and please Finish the DINOS A to Z before you leave please please I&#039;m begging you :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soory to hear you go <img src='http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  I really enjoy your post everyday &#8230; hope you continue in a new blog <img src='http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  and please Finish the DINOS A to Z before you leave please please I&#8217;m begging you <img src='http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dutch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/11/why-did-plant-munching-theropods-get-so-big/comment-page-1/#comment-7291</link>
		<dc:creator>Dutch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 07:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=8885#comment-7291</guid>
		<description>Everyday reader. Complete novise, just a word of thanks for your easy to read posts . Always interesting and so full of interesting points of view. Gonna be bummed if I can&#039;t find your work any more. Thank you,  for the down to earth knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyday reader. Complete novise, just a word of thanks for your easy to read posts . Always interesting and so full of interesting points of view. Gonna be bummed if I can&#8217;t find your work any more. Thank you,  for the down to earth knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 'Dr'. S Beckmann, BS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/11/why-did-plant-munching-theropods-get-so-big/comment-page-1/#comment-7289</link>
		<dc:creator>'Dr'. S Beckmann, BS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 04:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=8885#comment-7289</guid>
		<description>WHAT?!? First it was Click &amp; Clack (the Tappet brothers), then Lance, then Twinkies. Wait. It&#039;s... it&#039;s not steroids, is it Brian?!? ha
Good luck to ya, and if you&#039;re ever in the &#039;hood, stop on by!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHAT?!? First it was Click &amp; Clack (the Tappet brothers), then Lance, then Twinkies. Wait. It&#8217;s&#8230; it&#8217;s not steroids, is it Brian?!? ha<br />
Good luck to ya, and if you&#8217;re ever in the &#8216;hood, stop on by!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atrox7</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/11/why-did-plant-munching-theropods-get-so-big/comment-page-1/#comment-7287</link>
		<dc:creator>Atrox7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=8885#comment-7287</guid>
		<description>Sad to see you go. I check this everyday so please post your new blog site. (And finish the Dinos A to Z before you leave!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad to see you go. I check this everyday so please post your new blog site. (And finish the Dinos A to Z before you leave!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herman Diaz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/11/why-did-plant-munching-theropods-get-so-big/comment-page-1/#comment-7286</link>
		<dc:creator>Herman Diaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=8885#comment-7286</guid>
		<description>This reminds me of the mesothermic hypothesis as discussed by Sampson in &quot;Dinosaur Odyssey&quot; (See the McWhorter quote).

Quoting McWhorter ( http://www.booksandculture.com/articles/2010/janfeb/reanimation.html?paging=off ): &quot;Sampson thinks mesothermy explains a lot of other things about dinosaurs that otherwise seem just so. For example, one branch of theropods that yielded fecund subbranches (i.e., countless additions to The List) were apparently actually warm-blooded. This has become clear from gorgeously detailed fossils unearthed in China of late, revealing feathers, not for flying but for warmth. However, this does not mean that feathers were a quirk of dinosaurs in China: relatives of the same theropods have long been known from elsewhere but not as exquisitely preserved, meaning that the living creatures had feathers, too.

Sampson notes that these warm-blooded theropods are exactly the ones that did not trend toward the enormous. For example, the Velociraptor/Deinonychus type was among them, and there was no version the size of a building. Presumably it was because warm blood puts a limit on how big you can get. This is also the only branch of theropods that includes some varieties that went vegetarian (Naish&#039;s book, in a rare lapse, does not include a picture of these massive, pot-bellied freaks with Edward Scissorhands claws). Sampson traces this vegetarianism to warm-bloodedness as well: it&#039;s a challenge for carnivores to find enough food to keep their high metabolism going, and easier to do the trick eating plants, which have the courtesy to sit still while being eaten.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of the mesothermic hypothesis as discussed by Sampson in &#8220;Dinosaur Odyssey&#8221; (See the McWhorter quote).</p>
<p>Quoting McWhorter ( <a href="http://www.booksandculture.com/articles/2010/janfeb/reanimation.html?paging=off" rel="nofollow">http://www.booksandculture.com/articles/2010/janfeb/reanimation.html?paging=off</a> ): &#8220;Sampson thinks mesothermy explains a lot of other things about dinosaurs that otherwise seem just so. For example, one branch of theropods that yielded fecund subbranches (i.e., countless additions to The List) were apparently actually warm-blooded. This has become clear from gorgeously detailed fossils unearthed in China of late, revealing feathers, not for flying but for warmth. However, this does not mean that feathers were a quirk of dinosaurs in China: relatives of the same theropods have long been known from elsewhere but not as exquisitely preserved, meaning that the living creatures had feathers, too.</p>
<p>Sampson notes that these warm-blooded theropods are exactly the ones that did not trend toward the enormous. For example, the Velociraptor/Deinonychus type was among them, and there was no version the size of a building. Presumably it was because warm blood puts a limit on how big you can get. This is also the only branch of theropods that includes some varieties that went vegetarian (Naish&#8217;s book, in a rare lapse, does not include a picture of these massive, pot-bellied freaks with Edward Scissorhands claws). Sampson traces this vegetarianism to warm-bloodedness as well: it&#8217;s a challenge for carnivores to find enough food to keep their high metabolism going, and easier to do the trick eating plants, which have the courtesy to sit still while being eaten.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/11/why-did-plant-munching-theropods-get-so-big/comment-page-1/#comment-7284</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=8885#comment-7284</guid>
		<description>Sad to see you go, Brian.  This blog has been a lot of fun to read each day.  Looking forward to your new stuff, but hoping you find a suitable replacement for this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad to see you go, Brian.  This blog has been a lot of fun to read each day.  Looking forward to your new stuff, but hoping you find a suitable replacement for this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Witton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/11/why-did-plant-munching-theropods-get-so-big/comment-page-1/#comment-7283</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Witton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/?p=8885#comment-7283</guid>
		<description>Sorry to hear you&#039;re leaving Brian: your posts here have accompanied many afternoon teabreaks. Looking forward to seeing where you end up, though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to hear you&#8217;re leaving Brian: your posts here have accompanied many afternoon teabreaks. Looking forward to seeing where you end up, though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
