October 26, 2009

Food Fight in the News: Who Owns Hummus and Tabbouleh?

Over the weekend, Lebanon shattered three food-related Guinness World Records: Largest plate of hummus (over 2 tons), largest plate of tabbouleh (nearly 4 tons), and largest plate in general. (I liked the headline over this news brief in the Washington Post Express this morning: “Tragically, Giant Pita is Overlooked.”)

Between this and the 500-pound kibbeh (a snack made of minced meat and bulgur wheat) which earned Lebanon a world record earlier this year, you could be forgiven for calling the country obsessed with setting records. But this is no mere hobby; it’s a culinary campaign—specifically against Israel, the previous hummus record holder—to establish national ownership of these foods and the economic potential they represent. The name of the recent event says it all: The “Hummus and Tabbouleh are 100 percent Lebanese” festival. Neal Ungerleider has a good post on this topic at True/Slant.

Last year, the head of the Lebanese Industrialists Association told the media that his group planned to sue Israel for “stealing” hummus and other dishes (though as far as I can tell, no lawsuit has materialized), citing the precedent of feta cheese, a food name that the European Union has ruled belongs exclusively to Greece. And then, of course, there’s France’s champagne and Rocquefort cheese, Italy’s Parma ham and Parmesan cheese, and hundreds of other food products with “protected designations of origin” under European Union rules. (India’s Darjeeling tea could be next.)

What do you think, should a country or region be allowed to lay exclusive claim to particular foods or food products?



Posted By: Amanda Bensen — Around the World, In the News | Link | Comments (2)



2 Comments »

  1. Hummus,Tabbouleh, Feta, Baklava and many more are Middle Eastern (+Greece) including Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Israel and Egypt. All these countries have their own versions.

    Comment by Michele Carlson — October 26, 2009 @ 11:24 pm


  2. The European designations aren’t just about naming, they’re about exactly how something is made; which, to my mind, is a partian justification. What is less justifiable is the universal European claim that if that exact technique isn’t used in that exact area – same soil, water, local acorns, and so on – then it isn’t parma ham, roquefort, parmesan, etc. Having tasted a great deal of parma ham, roquefort, parmesan, etc, I have my doubts about that claim.

    As for hummus et al, I think that horse has left the barn.

    Comment by WilliamB — October 28, 2009 @ 9:14 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Advertisement