April 14, 2011
Ban the Bag: Should Kids Be Forbidden From Bringing Lunch to School?
For students at Little Village Academy in Chicago, bringing lunch to school is verboten. Principals of Chicago’s public schools are allowed to implement a “no bag lunch” policy if they say it serves the needs of their students. Principal Elsa Carmona began the ban at Little Village Academy six years ago in response to seeing students eating chips and soda during school field trips. ”Nutrition wise, it is better for the children to eat at the school,” Carmona told the Chicago Tribune. “It’s about the nutrition and the excellent quality food that they are able to serve (in the lunchroom). It’s milk versus a Coke.” Exceptions are made for students with food allergies or other medical issues that would prevent them from being able to eat the school’s offerings.
Home-packed lunches have raised issues well before the Tribune‘s story lit up the Internet Monday morning. Because some children have life-threatenng allergies, public schools have been known to ban specific foods—such as nuts and nut-based products—to try to create a safe environment for those students with special needs. (Schools have also restricted milk and egg products, but these instances are comparatively rare.) Some schools also implement “no trading” policies, prohibiting students from exchanging food so that allergic reactions aren’t accidentally triggered. While some parents argue that asking an entire school population to adjust its behavior to accommodate the few, others rise to the challenge of working within the school’s parameters.
I started packing lunch in response to appalling food options offered at school. My high school cafeteria was littered with vending machines–soda, ice cream, snack foods, and one that offered every flavor of milk except plain—and your choice of Taco Bell and Subway fare for a main course. I had nutritionally balanced lunches by way of the federally subsidized lunch program in elementary and middle school—as well as eagle-eyed cafeteria staffers who would send you back in line if you came to the register without a fruit or vegetable on your tray. I still have no idea why school food became so poor once I got into high school, but I’m glad it got me into the habit of bringing my own food. And I still pack lunch on a daily basis. Knowing I have to fill the lunchbox in the morning has been a big incentive to cook for myself and to pack fruit to snack on throughout the day. And as others will attest, brown bagging it has some serious advantages—notably when it comes to saving money.
However, food from home and good nutrition are not necessarily one in the same. With childhood obesity levels staggeringly high, public schools are a venue where kids can be guaranteed access to healthy food, especially with the recent expansion of the federal school lunch program. And hopefully, those changes will indeed bring about positive nutritional changes. The blogger known only as Mrs. Q documented a year of eating public school lunches and the quality of the meals really ran the gamut. And who here remembers the state of school lunches served in Huntington, West Virginia before Jamie Oliver mounted an intervention?
Is this a nanny state policy or a step in the right direction? Continue the discussion in the comments area below.
Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.























Education, education, education – and not “do as I say but not as I do,” either. Every school should have a nutrition curriculum…and a school lunch that demonstrates that curriculum. Education is a much more effective tool than a ban.
However – when kids are bringing food to share, I do agree that the school has some responsibility – not just to prevent medical emergencies – but to hold kids to the standards of their nutrition curriculum or wellness policy.
How about teaching kids how too cook in middle and high school? Most schools have done away with Home Ec programs. Good nutrition and home cooking go hand in hand.
I do NOT agree with allowing the schools to be the “diet police”. To not permit parents to choose what they want their children to eat is way beyond reasonable. This is much too intrusive. Providing a nutritional meal to those who choose to eat it is fine, forcing them to eat it or go hungry is ridiculous!!!!
Unbelievable, it’s the opposite. I don’t let my kids eat anything at school. They used to come back with fever and stomach ache from all those packaged food. So I always pack their lunch. If they forbid that, kids better stay home.
If my daughter didn’t bring her lunch to school she wouldn’t eat lunch. As a practicing vegetarian and a picky eater, she finds few choices at school. She thinks American cheese tastes like plastic–but that’s what is used for the grilled cheese sandwich, one of the vegetarian options. She says the pizza sauce on the cheese pizza falls off. So, most days, I pack her a box of organic milk and a sandwich of some kind–her favorite is vegetarian deli ham and provolone cheese. BTW, it’s actually more ecological to pack her lunch, even when using a fold-over baggie for the sandwich, since the school lunches are served on Styrofoam trays that are thrown out.
If the schools are going to say that home packed lunches are forbidden, then the schools had better provide better food than they did when I was going to school. All those luke warm soggy veggies, and dried out hamburgers. Yuck!
I don’t agree with the idea. Parents still have the right to make and prepare pack lunches for their kids. Because home cook meal is more safe and good to eat. If the school cafeteria will only provide lunches that mothers cooked for their kids and they also used stainless tableware, then no parents would be worried. =) I hope, every schools also considers what the parents have in mind.
This is too intrusive. As a parent, I get to decide what my child eats. When I was growing up, I brought my lunch to school most of the time. The school sent the menu home every week, and my parents would be able to see if there was a hot lunch day that they would give me money for once in a while. I know what my children like and I won’t send them to school wondering what will be on the menu and if they will eat it or not. If I pack their lunch, then I know they will like the things I pack. My sons are creatures of habit and they usually want a sandwich, a yogurt and a fruit for lunch almost everyday.
Also, on special days I could put a little treat like a note and a hershey kiss in their lunch– no principal should be able to tell me thats not allowed!
Not having the option to bring your own lunch is insane! I’m a mother of 3 children and just had a sort of heated discussion about this yesterday with another parent. My youngest is 4 and we were having discussions about PreK, long story short she asked me about a particular school that her child was attending. I responded that one of the reason I chose not to send my child there is because bringing lunch from home is not an option. Needless to say I felt like I had to defend my reason for wanting to send my own daughter with her own food. Since when I feeding my child her own food from home not an option. From the beginnning of time we’ve always had the option to bring your own lunch. Bringing your own lunch shouldn’t just be regimented to those that have medical and religious reasons to support your choice. How about that’s just my preference! For those that like the convenience of not having to prepare lunch for their child daily hats off to you. However, respect those that choose to send their children with their own food.