Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Food & Think

A heaping helping of food news, science and culture

Off the Road

The travel adventures of a nomad on the cheap


January 10, 2013

How Hot is That Pepper? Unpacking the Scoville Scale

Photo by Katte Belletje.

In 2007, the Naga Bhut Joloki or “Ghost chile” was named the hottest pepper on earth. Then in 2010 the Naga Viper stole the title. And in 2012 the Trinidad Scorpion Moruga Blend moved into the lead. And for good reason.

The Scorpion ranks at round 2 million heat units on the Scoville scale. (For comparison, tabasco sauce has 2,500–5,000 Scoville heat units or SHU.) What exactly does that mean? When the scale was invented in 1912 by pharmacist Wilbur Scoville in search of a heat-producing ointment, it was based on human taste buds. The idea was to dilute an alcohol-based extract made with the given pepper until it no longer tasted hot to a group of taste testers. The degree of dilution translates to the SHU. In other words, according to the Scoville scale, you would need as many as 5,000 cups of water to dilute 1 cup of tobacco sauce enough to no longer taste the heat.

And while the Scoville scale is still widely used, says Dr. Paul Bosland, professor of horticulture at New Mexico State University and author or several books on chile peppers, it no longer relies on the fallible human taste bud.

“It’s easy to get what’s called taster’s fatigue,” says Bosland. “Pretty soon your receptors are worn out or overused, and you can’t taste anymore. So over the years, we’ve devised a system where we used what’s called high performance liquid chromatography.”

Photo of Wilbur Scoville courtesy of the Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences.

That’s a fancy way of saying that scientists are now able to determine how many parts per million of heat-causing alkaloids are present in a given chile pepper. The same scientists have also figured out that if they multiply that number by 16, they’ll arrive at the pepper’s Scoville rating (or “close enough for the industry,” says Bosland).

And, let’s face it, who would want to be the one to taste test a pepper named after a viper or a scorpion? Or maybe the better question is what sane person would? The BBC recently reported on the first man to finish an entire portion of a curry made with ghost chiles, called “The Widower,” and he suffered actual hallucinations due to the heat. Bosland told the AP in 2007 he thought the ghost chile had been given it’s name “because the chili is so hot, you give up the ghost when you eat it.” How’s that for inviting?

Indeed, the capsaicin, the spicy chemical compound found in chiles demands the diner’s attention much like actual heat heat does. And it turns out there’s science behind that similarity. “The same receptor that says ‘hot coffee’ to your brain is telling you ‘hot chile peppers,’” says Bosland.

And what about the rumor that very hot peppers have the potential to damage our taste buds? Not true. Bosland says we should think of chile heat like we do the taste of salt; easy to overdo in the moment, but not damaging to your mouth over the long term. Even the hottest habanero (100,000–350,000 on the Scoville scale), which can stay on your palate for hours — if not days –  won’t wear out your tender buds.

NMSU photo by Harrison Brooks

Bosland and his colleagues have broken the heat profile of chile peppers into five distinctly different characteristics. 1) how hot it is, 2) how fast the heat comes on, 3) whether it linger or dissipates quickly, 4) where you sense the heat – on the tip of tongue, at the back of throat, etc., and 5) whether the heat registers as “flat” or “sharp.”

This last characteristic is fascinating for what it says about cultural chile pepper preferences (say that five times fast). Apparently those raised in Asian cultures — where chile heat has been considered one of the six core tastes for thousands of years — prefer sharp heat that feels like pinpricks but dissipates quickly. Most Americans, on the other hand, like a flat, sustained heat that feels almost like it’s been painted on with a brush.

The Chile Pepper Institute, which is affiliated with New Mexico State University, sells a nifty chile tasting wheel, which describes the heat and flavor profiles of many different chiles and offers advise on how to cook them.

Eating chiles is a little like tasting wine, says Bosland. “When you first drink wine, all you notice is the alcohol. Then you can tell red from white, and soon you can taste the difference between the varietals. Eventually you can tell what region the wine comes from. That’s how it is with chile peppers too. At first all you taste is heat, but soon you’re be able to tell which heat sensations you like best.”

 



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

9 Comments »

  1. Dave says:

    I suspect you meant one cup of “tabasco” sauce in paragraph two, not “tobacco” sauce.

  2. Wayno says:

    OK, but why can you also feel the heat on the way out, the next day. Ain’t no taste buds there!

  3. Lis Riba says:

    Is anybody working on a comparable scale for “heat” from the mustard/horseradish family of foods?

    If not, why not?

  4. Luke says:

    “…Asian cultures — where chile heat has been considered one of the six core tastes for thousands of years…”

    Since chilis didn’t come to the old world until after Columbus arrived on the scene, shouldn’t this say “hundreds of years?” Or should “chile heat” be changed to something else, like just “heat” (from other foods, like black peppers)?

  5. If chilies are native to South America how can the Asian cultures have considered chili heat “one of the six core tastes for thousands of years”?

  6. Anne says:

    The article is riddled with typographical errors. No copy editors, huh?

  7. Paul says:

    OK. So journalistes should hold themsulves to a higher standurd of writing, but c’mon. Stop being so petti with commants. Did you take any time to enjoy the content, despite what you may have thought of the qualety of the grammer or spelling?

    I am as critical of headline and article writers as anyone else. If the spelling AND grammar checking did not make them curious enough to figure out what was wrong and FIX it, maybe they deserve to be castigated. (Look it up when you get home.)

    Still, this was far more enjoyable – and much less inane – than many things I’ve seen in the media recently. Thanks for a thought provoking treatment of the subject!

  8. Elliott Winslow says:

    Maybe the editor is also the ghost chile taster, and was hallucinating during his proofread of this article…

  9. Carol J says:

    And then there are people like me who can’t eat any kind of hot pepper. I end up with a mouthful of little white blisters.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement