Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Paleofuture

A history of the future that never was

Past Imperfect

History with all the interesting bits left in


February 29, 2012

The Aftermath of Mountain Meadows

John D. Lee, seated on his coffin, moments before his execution. Photo: Wikipedia

John Doyle Lee was born in Illinois Territory in 1812. By the time he was 3, his mother was dead. Relatives took him in from his alcoholic father and put him to work on their farm at a young age. At 20, Lee began courting Agatha Ann Woolsey in Vandalia, Illinois, and in the summer of 1833, she became Lee’s wife—the first of 19 for John D. Lee, who would soon commit himself to the nascent Latter-day Saints movement. He professed his commitment till the day he was executed for his part in the Mountain Meadows Massacre.

The massacre, in 1857, was one of the most explosive episodes in the history of the American West—not only were 120 men, women and children killed, but the United States and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints almost went to war. The denouement of the so-called Utah War set Utah on the path to statehood and the Mormons on a long and fitful accommodation to secular authority, but the Mountain Meadows Massacre remained a focus of suspicion and resentment for decades. The church issued a statement on the role its members played in the killings in 2007, and opened its archives to three scholars—Richard E. Turley Jr., a Latter-day Saint historian, and Brigham Young University professors Ronald W. Walker and Glen M. Leonard—for their book, Massacre at Mountain Meadows, published in 2008. But in the aftermath of the massacre, only one participant was brought to trial, and that was John D. Lee.

Lee and his wife joined the Mormon settlement in Far West, Missouri, in 1837. That was only seven years after Joseph Smith founded the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, but already the Mormons had been pushed out of Smith’s home state of New York and Ohio. Conflicts arose on grounds both religious and secular—Smith preached that other Christian churches had strayed; Mormons tended to vote as a bloc and to outwork others, concentrating both political and economic power—and the antagonism intensified to the point that the Mormons would be evicted from Missouri and Illinois, where Smith was lynched in 1844. To break a cycle of mutual suspicion, recrimination and violence, Brigham Young, who would succeed Smith, made plans to lead the remaining LDS members on an exodus to Utah, which was then part of Mexico—beyond the reach of U.S. law.

John Doyle Lee. Photo: Wikipedia

As a recent convert John D. Lee joined a secret church order called the Danites, which was charged with protecting and defending Mormons. When some Missourians opposed to Mormons’ voting started a riot at a Daviess County polling center in 1838, Lee and his fellow Danites stormed into the crowd with clubs flying. “I felt the power of God nerve my arm for the fray,” he later said. Buildings were burned, and Lee later admitted that he had participated in looting.

Lee was in Kentucky when Smith was killed in 1844, but when he returned to Illinois he learned of Young’s plan to head for Utah. Lee joined the migration through hostile and foreboding territory (which led to Young’s nickname of  “the Mormon Moses”), and Young appointed him a Captain of Fifty—a ranking based on number of people under one’s command. Lee served as a clerk and purchasing agent.

In July of 1847, a contingent of Mormons arrived in the Great Salt Lake valley and began a settlement that would grow to thousands in the coming years. Just six months later, Mexico ceded that land, and so much more of the West, to the United States. The old conflicts between religious and secular power arose again. President Millard Fillmore appointed Brigham Young governor of the Utah Territory and superintendent of Indian affairs, but the Mormons kept their distance from outsiders—including officials sent from Washington, D.C.

Non-Mormon locals immediately resented the appointment of Mormon surveyors and Indian agents, one of whom was John D. Lee. The agents’ relationship with the Native Americans, to whom they supplied tools, seed and proselytizing, aroused suspicion, especially among federal soldiers in the area. Mormon men, meanwhile, took offense when soldiers tried to socialize with Mormon women. Once the Army departed, “as many as one hundred Mormon women went with them,” according to Turley, Walker and Leonard. “Everybody has got one except the Colonel and Major,” one soldier said. “The Doctor has got three—mother and two daughters.  The mother cooks for him and the daughters sleep with him.” The familiar cycle of suspicion and resentment built toward violence into the mid-1850s. Rumors that the LDS church was sanctioning polygamy—which turned out to be true—only made matters worse.

In April 1857, a Mormon apostle named Parley P. Pratt was murdered in Arkansas by the legal husband of one of Pratt’s plural wives. Mormons in Utah took the news as another example of religious persecution and considered Pratt a martyr. They began stockpiling grain, anticipating a violent and apocalyptic encounter with the people they called “Americans.”  The Army, they believed, was about to invade the Utah Territory, (an invasion that did not come until the following year in the Utah War) and Young tried to enlist Paiute Indians from nearby Mountain Meadows in the fight. He also warned “mobocrats” to steer clear of Mormon territory or they’d be met by the Danites, who would form a line of defense in villages near Mountain Meadows. Then he declared martial law, making it illegal to travel through the territory without a permit.

At the same time, several groups of emigrants from northwest Arkansas, mostly families that in total numbered between 100-200 people, were making their way to California by wagon trains. Joining up in Salt Lake City, the Baker-Fancher party restocked their supplies, but for the rest of their trip, Mormons were prohibited from selling any goods to wagon trains. Lee and another Mormon man, apostle George A. Smith, met with the Paiutes, a a tribe of Native Americans in the region, and warned them that the encroaching Americans threatened both them and the Mormons; rumors circulated that members of the Baker-Fancher train might poison water and cattle along their way.

The Baker-Fincher party was most likely unaware of the new requirement for a permit to cross Utah. They grazed their cattle on Mormons’ land as they passed through, stoking anger. Lee later said that members of the train “swore and boasted openly…that Buchan[a]n’s whole army was coming right behind them, and would kill every… Mormon in Utah.” Others reported that the men of the Baker-Fancher party were respectful.

Throughout the summer of 1857, the Mormons’ sense of impending invasion only deepened. Parades through Cedar City included young men bearing banners reading, “A terror to evil doers,” according to Turley, Walker, and Leonard. Along the southern settlements, Mormons were urged to “shore up alliances with local Indians.” When Lee came into the vicinity of the Baker-Fancher train, he said, he saw a large group of Paiutes “in their war paint, and fully equipped for battle.” Lee claimed that he had orders from Isaac C. Haight, a leader of several Mormon congregations that formed the Iron County Militia, “to send other Indians on the war-path to help them kill the emigrants.” Haight and Lee gave weapons to the Paiutes.

The Baker-Fancher party was camped at Mountain Meadows on September 7 when Paiutes (and some Mormons dressed as Paiutes to conceal their Mormon affiliation) attacked. The emigrants circled the wagons, dug trenches and fought back—but as the siege continued for five days, they began to run out of ammunition, water and provisions. The Mormon attackers concluded that the emigrants had figured out their ruse—and feared that word of their participation would hasten an assault by the Army. It was then that militia commander William H. Dame ordered his men to leave no witnesses. The emigrants were to be “decoyed out and destroyed with the exception of the small children,” who were “too young to tell tales,” according to another militia commander, Major John H. Higbee, who relayed the orders to Lee.

On September 11, John D. Lee and a group of militiamen approached the camp under a white flag and offered a truce, with assurances that Lee and his men would escort the emigrants to safety in Cedar City. All they’d have to do is leave their livestock and possessions to the Paiutes. Having no good options, the emigrants, about 120 men, women and children, laid down their weapons and followed Lee and the militia away from the camp in three groups—the last comprising adult males. It was over quickly. The Arkansas men were shot at point-blank range; the women and children ahead were slaughtered by bullets and arrows in an ambush party. No one over the age of seven survived. The victims were hastily buried. Locals auctioned off or distributed their possessions and took in the surviving 17 young children.

The Army did arrive in Utah, in 1858, but no war ensued—Young and the Buchanan administration negotiated an agreement in which Young would give way to a new governor. The following year, troops led by Major James H. Carleton went to Mountain Meadows to investigate the killings and found the bones of “very small children.” The soldiers gathered skulls and bones and erected a cairn with the words, “Here 120 men, women, and children were massacred in cold blood early in September, 1857. They were from Arkansas.” They marked the site with a cross inscribed, “Vengeance is mine. I will repay, saith the Lord.”

Brigham Young. Photo: Wikipedia

Lee and the other leaders swore that they would never reveal their parts in the massacre, and Lee himself told Brigham Young that the Paiutes had been responsible for it—an explanation that became the official position of the LDS church for generations. In a report to Congress, Major Carleton blamed Mormon militiamen and church leaders for the massacre. Young excommunicated both Lee and Haight  for their roles, but only Lee faced charges. After a first trial ended in a mistrial, Lee was convicted in 1877 and sentenced to death by firing squad.

Lee claimed that he was a scapegoat, and that other Mormons were more directly involved in the planning and in the killing. And although he maintained at first that Young was unaware of the massacre until after it took place, Lee would later state, in his Life and Confessions of John D. Lee, that the massacre occurred “by the direct command of Brigham Young.” And on the morning of his execution, Lee would write that Young was “leading the people astray” and that he was being sacrificed “in a cowardly, dastardly manner.”

“I did everything in my power to save that people, but I am the one that must suffer,” Lee wrote. He closed by asking the Lord to receive his spirit, and then he was taken to the massacre site. As many as 300 onlookers had gathered. On March 28, 1877, John Doyle Lee, wearing a coat and scarf, took a seat atop the coffin where his body would lie. A photographer was nearby. Lee asked that whatever photograph was made be copied for his last three wives. The photographer agreed. Lee posed. And then an hour before noon, he shook hands with the men around him, removed his coat and hat and faced the five men of the firing party.

“Let them shoot the balls through my heart!” Lee shouted. “Don’t let them mangle my body!”

On U.S. Marshal William Nelson’s command, shots rang out in the ravine where so many shots had rung out twenty years before, and Lee fell back onto his coffin, dead.

On April 20, 1961, a joint council was held with the First Presidency and the Council of Twelve Apostles of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. “After considering all the facts available,” the Church authorized “reinstatement to membership and former blessings [temple marriages] to John D. Lee.” The reinstatement puzzled many. But four decades later, the church claimed full responsibility for the incident that led to Lee’s execution. At a memorial ceremony on September 11, 2007, the sesquicentennial anniversary of the Mountain Meadows Massacre, LDS Apostle Henry B. Eyring read the church’s official statement to gatherers:

“We express profound regret for the massacre carried out in this valley 150 years ago today, and for the undue and untold suffering experienced by the victims then and by their relatives to the present time. A separate expression of regret is owed the Paiute people who have unjustly borne for too long the principal blame for what occurred during the massacre. Although the extent of their involvement is disputed, it is believed they would not have participated without the direction and stimulus provided by local church leaders and members.”

Sources

Books: Ronald W. Walker, Richard E. Turley, Glen M. Leonard, Massacre at Mountain Meadows, Oxford University Press, 2008.  Will Bagley, Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows, University of Oklahoma Press, 2002.  Jon Krakauer, Under the Banner of Heaven: A Story of Violent Faith, Doubleday, 2003. Sally Denton, American Massacre: The Tragedy at Mountain Meadows, Alfred A. Knopf., 2003.

Articles: “The Brink of War,” by David Roberts, Smithsonian magazine, June, 2008. “Books: A Blot on the Mormon Faith, Church’s History Fraught with Violence, Bloodshed,” by John Freeman, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, July 13, 2003. “New Perspectives on The West: John Doyle Lee, (1812-1877) PBS—The West—John Doyle Lee, http://www.pbs.org/weta/thewest/people/i_r/lee.htm.  “John D. Lee,” Utah History Encyclopedia, http://www.media.utah.edu/UHE/l/LEE,JOHN.html.  “Shining New Light on the Mountain Meadows Massacre,” Transcription of 2003 FAIR Conference presentation by Gene Sessions, FAIR: Defending Mormonism, http://www.fairlds.org/fair-conferences/2003-fair-conference/2003-shining-new-light-on-the-mountain-meadows-massacre.  “Last Words and the Execution of John D. Lee, March 28, 1877,” As reported by his attorney, William W. Bishop in Mormonism Unveiled; Or the Life and Confession of John D. Lee (1877).  Mountain Meadows Massacre Trial Homepage: http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/mountainmeadows/leeexecution.html



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

10 Comments »

  1. Jennifer says:

    Just a quick clarification. Joseph Smith was shot in Carthage Jail by a mob not lynched.

    • Gilbert King says:

      Hi, Jennifer. “Lynching” was usually done by rope back in the day, but a lynching is generally defined by the actions of a mob, executing someone outside the court system, whether it’s by hanging, shooting, or drowning. And if you’re in Utah, you can visit the LDS Church Historical Museum and see the gun that Joseph Smith used to fire back at the mob in Carthage!

  2. Sally Denton says:

    Hi Gilbert King,
    Good piece.
    I’m wondering why the publisher of my book, “American Massacre,” is not listed as Alfred Knopf? I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a Martin Secker & Warburg edition.
    Sally Denton

    • Gilbert King says:

      Hi, Ms. Denton. The sourcing has been corrected to reflect Alfred A. Knopf as publisher of your book. I had cited from the 2003 British edition. Thanks for pointing this out. –Gilbert

  3. Shannon Novak says:

    You may also want to look at my book, which details the history of the victims, including the findings from the skeletal remains accidentally unearthed in 1999.

    Novak, Shannon A. (2008) House of Mourning: A Biocultural History of the Mountain Meadows Massacre. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

  4. Harold W. Simons says:

    The list of pertinent books fails to include the very early, very scholarly book by Juanita Brooks, The Mountain Meadows Massacre, the first edition of which was published at Stanford, California by the Stanford University Press in 1950, and the second edition published at Norman, Oklahoma by the University of Oklahoma Press in 1962.

    The impact this had on Juanita Brooks life is included in an article written by Davis Bitton and Maureen Ursenbach titled: “Riding Herd: A Conversation with Juanita Brooks” which was published in Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 9, no.1 (Spring 1974): pp 11-33.

  5. Will Bagley says:

    “Much has been written, and will be continue to be written, about this horror, as it stands as a timeless, universal caution to the murderous ownership of truth, of how good men conjure evil in the name of god and can become so invested in their own cover-up that in time they become the only people who believe it.” So wrote Logan Heber in the best recent look at Mountain Meadows:

    Logan Hebner and Michael L. Plyler. “Southern Paiute: A Portrait.” Logan: Utah State University Press, 2010, page 9.

    I’m as tired to the subject as Juanita Brooks was, but have written my share of commentary on the atrocity, but I’ve written a lot about it since 2002.

    Bagley, Will. “’They Have Slain My Children’: The Rescue of the Orphans of Mountain Meadows.” Wild West 17:5 (February 2005), 28–36.

    Bagley, Will. “Big Trouble: The Legacy of Mountain Meadows.” Wild West 20:3 (October 2007), 50–57.

    David L. Bigler and Will Bagley. The Mormon Rebellion: America’s First Civil War. Norman: The University of Oklahoma, 2011.

    Dave and I also published “Innocent Blood: Essential Narratives of the Mountain Meadows Massacre” (Norman: The Arthur H. Clark Company, 2008).

    Finally, later thoughts on why Brigham Young did it are in Deborah Lawrence and Jon Lawrence, eds. “Violent Encounters: Interviews on Western Massacres.” Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2011. An early edit of the interview, along with Dave Bigler’s “Terror on the Trail: The Massacre at Mountain Meadows” is available at:

    http://www.oldspanishtrail.org/assets/downloads/Vol12-12006.pdf

  6. Randy Wright says:

    While I’m no stranger to the subject of the Mountain Meadows Massacre and ten years ago published a rebuttal to a guest editorial in Southern Utah’s St. George “Spectrum” on one aspect of the mass murders, I’m only now reading “Massacre at Mountain Meadows,” which Gilbert cited as one of the books available on that complex and controversial subject.

    Seeing this blog, my first reaction was to post a “not intended for publication reply” to Gilbert on some claims from the Turley, Walker & Leonard volume that he’d clearly summarized, and I suggested they might not hold up to some easy fact-checking. He graciously replied, and I next e-mailed Will Bagley whose post appears above. I have no doubt Will is “tired to the subject”; he should be permitted that entitlement, after what, five in-depth books and countless articles and group presentations, but he’s also a marvelous friend who’s still willing to pick up the gauntlet when necessary.

    Will’s material and his blunt charges against Brigham Young are available in the additional links and references he provided. Beyond noting I agree with his conclusions simply because the alternatives require too many convoluted mental leaps and “can’t be” assumptions, I’ll let others engage in that debate for the time being.

    Equally complex and convoluted, however, are issues of “the persecution of the Saints” that form the basis of the first few chapters of Leonard et al. “Massacre at Mountain Meadows” was underwritten by the Mormon Church and clearly intended as a “rebuttal” to “Blood of the Prophets,” at least as far as the issue of Brigham Young’s guilt. Given the book’s “genealogy,” it is fair to address those claims without being attacked for “engaging in religious bigotry.”

    It’s a cliché to suggest a comprehensive discussion and history of the Mormon Exodus would fill several encyclopedia volumes, so I’ll only briefly note some curious examples of historical distortion that warrant scrutiny. The backdrop, of course, is the easy observation, “The Mormons couldn’t get along with their neighbors,” and pro-LDS historians have found answering the “why” segment of that discussion particularly onerous and troublesome.

    Perhaps that explains the authors’ fanciful, “Non-Mormon locals immediately resented the appointment of Mormon surveyors and Indian agents, one of whom was John D. Lee.”

    In early 1850′s Utah there were essentially no “Non-Mormon locals,” excluding Jim Bridger up in Wyoming and possibly a few other stray mountain men who were decided anti-social sorts not given to communicating with Washington. Dr. Garland Hurt, the only other possible non-Mormon “candidate” didn’t begin his work with the Indians until 1855. And in the aftermath of the massacre, Hurt fled Utah, fearing for his life.

    Some other questionable interpretations that suggest themselves: By the time of the Steptoe Expedition in 1854, the LDS practice of polygamy wasn’t simply rumor. Mormons themselves “announced it to the world” in their fall General Conference in 1852. This followed on the heels of a modest bestseller written by Captain John W. Gunnison that appeared in the Eastern press detailing a year he’d spent in Utah in 1849 doing survey work as part of the Stansbury Expedition.

    Colonel Steptoe was in Utah because he’d been sent there to investigate the murders of Captain Gunnison and other men under his command in 1853. Most historians attribute the killings to Pahvant (Ute) Indians, but of course rumors abounded.

    I’ll repeat my observation there were very few non-Mormons in Utah circa 1849-54, and Leonard et al are in error in suggesting conflicts between Mormons and non-Mormons created the initial friction that led to hostility between the Saints and the rest of the country. A review of Brigham Young’s fiery rhetoric at the time will point to more obvious origins. As in Mountain Meadows, a strong case exists for laying the blame on the LDS leader. Bagley and Bigler’s “The Mormon Rebellion: America’s First Civil War” point overwhelmingly to that conclusion.

    It’s also doubtful Colonel Steptoe’s men led Mormon women away at gunpoint; they were known to be fleeing impoverished conditions that included plural marriages. My own great-great grandmother arrived in this valley as young girl of 15; the LDS missionary she’d fallen for in Scotland and come here seeking hadn’t told her about the first wife.

    Moving on to the actual massacre itself, the Paiutes’ oral tradition is they weren’t involved, and there are credible reasons to believe few were (probably some participated, however, along with a number of “freebooters”). The initial attack on the Fancher-Baker train killed or seriously wounded most of the adult males in the party; Indian marksmanship with weapons they’d allegedly been provided is unlikely to have been that deadly, and the Southern Utah pioneers were also crack shots.

    That should be sufficient for now; I’m grateful to see Shannon Novak has chimed in. Her fantastic forensic work–done under particularly pressured circumstances–offered considerable illumination; the victims’ remains she examined showed most were shot in the head at close range.

    In truth, a large number of factors and some powerful and credible historical sources need to be factored into this discussion.

  7. Ron Genini says:

    Mr Wright is to be congratulated for his comment on this never dying subject. While the LDS leadership’s statement in September 2007 seems to accept responsibility for the church’s participation it shies away from an actual admission of wrong-doing by Brigham Young and his apostles. This will continue to be a controversial topic until the LDS admits its active role and doesn’t try to palm it off on underlings away from the Mormon capital. Were they to admit it there might be some shock among Mormons but it would soon dissipate as one of the major criticisms of the Mormons altering their history. For some reason they are reluctant. In any case I found Mr Wright’s comments scholarly, reasonably unbiased (it being impossible to write history which does not try to prove a point, no matter how innocently), and cogent. Since American Heritage has a long -and good – record of reporting on Mountain Meadows this is merely another fine addition to that accomplishment. John 8:32 in the New Testament which the Mormons follow gives the advice on how to deal with these unpleasant historical facts: “the truth shall set you free.”

  8. Harvey Longhurst says:

    What would be your thinking if a gun were pushed into your face with the declaration of “This gun has killed several ‘Mormons’ and it will kill several more”. This was the experience of the grandfather of my friend M. Shumway who lived in southern Utah at that time. This is found in his journal. Was the massacre justified or right? Absolutely NO. Consider your choice, live or let live.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement