<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Aftermath of Mountain Meadows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/2012/02/the-aftermath-of-mountain-meadows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/2012/02/the-aftermath-of-mountain-meadows/</link>
	<description>History with all the interesting bits left in</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:36:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey Longhurst</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/2012/02/the-aftermath-of-mountain-meadows/#comment-1931</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey Longhurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/?p=5288#comment-1931</guid>
		<description>What would be your thinking if a gun were pushed into your face with the declaration of &quot;This gun has killed several ‘Mormons’ and it will kill several more”.  This was the experience of the grandfather of my friend M. Shumway who lived in southern Utah at that time.  This is found in his journal.  Was the massacre justified or right?  Absolutely NO.  Consider your choice, live or let live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would be your thinking if a gun were pushed into your face with the declaration of &#8220;This gun has killed several ‘Mormons’ and it will kill several more”.  This was the experience of the grandfather of my friend M. Shumway who lived in southern Utah at that time.  This is found in his journal.  Was the massacre justified or right?  Absolutely NO.  Consider your choice, live or let live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Genini</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/2012/02/the-aftermath-of-mountain-meadows/#comment-1598</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Genini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 05:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/?p=5288#comment-1598</guid>
		<description>Mr Wright is to be congratulated for his comment on this never dying subject. While the LDS leadership&#039;s statement in September 2007 seems to accept responsibility for the church&#039;s participation it shies away from an actual admission of wrong-doing by Brigham Young and his apostles. This will continue to be a controversial topic until the LDS admits its active role and doesn&#039;t try to palm it off on underlings away from the Mormon capital. Were they to admit it there might be some shock among Mormons but it would soon dissipate as one of the major criticisms of the Mormons altering their history. For some reason they are reluctant. In any case I found Mr Wright&#039;s comments scholarly, reasonably unbiased (it being impossible to write history which does not try  to prove a point, no matter how innocently), and cogent. Since American Heritage has a long -and good - record of reporting on Mountain Meadows this is merely another fine addition to that accomplishment. John 8:32 in the New Testament which the Mormons follow gives the advice on how to deal with these unpleasant historical facts: &quot;the truth shall set you free.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Wright is to be congratulated for his comment on this never dying subject. While the LDS leadership&#8217;s statement in September 2007 seems to accept responsibility for the church&#8217;s participation it shies away from an actual admission of wrong-doing by Brigham Young and his apostles. This will continue to be a controversial topic until the LDS admits its active role and doesn&#8217;t try to palm it off on underlings away from the Mormon capital. Were they to admit it there might be some shock among Mormons but it would soon dissipate as one of the major criticisms of the Mormons altering their history. For some reason they are reluctant. In any case I found Mr Wright&#8217;s comments scholarly, reasonably unbiased (it being impossible to write history which does not try  to prove a point, no matter how innocently), and cogent. Since American Heritage has a long -and good &#8211; record of reporting on Mountain Meadows this is merely another fine addition to that accomplishment. John 8:32 in the New Testament which the Mormons follow gives the advice on how to deal with these unpleasant historical facts: &#8220;the truth shall set you free.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Wright</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/2012/02/the-aftermath-of-mountain-meadows/#comment-1597</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/?p=5288#comment-1597</guid>
		<description>While I&#039;m no stranger to the subject of the Mountain Meadows Massacre and ten years  ago published a rebuttal to a guest editorial in Southern Utah&#039;s St. George &quot;Spectrum&quot; on one aspect of the mass murders, I&#039;m only now reading &quot;Massacre at Mountain Meadows,&quot; which Gilbert cited as one of the books available on that complex and controversial subject.

Seeing this blog, my first reaction was to post a &quot;not intended for publication reply&quot; to Gilbert on some claims from the Turley, Walker &amp; Leonard volume that he&#039;d clearly summarized, and I suggested they might not hold up to some easy fact-checking. He graciously replied, and I next e-mailed Will Bagley whose post appears above. I have no doubt Will is &quot;tired to the subject&quot;; he should be permitted that entitlement, after what, five in-depth books and countless articles and group presentations, but he&#039;s also a marvelous friend who&#039;s still willing to pick up the gauntlet when necessary.  

Will&#039;s material and his blunt charges against Brigham Young are available in the additional links and references he provided. Beyond noting I agree with his conclusions simply because the alternatives require too many convoluted mental leaps and &quot;can&#039;t be&quot; assumptions, I&#039;ll let others engage in that debate for the time being.

Equally complex and convoluted, however, are issues of &quot;the persecution of the Saints&quot; that form the basis of the first few chapters of Leonard et al.  &quot;Massacre at Mountain Meadows&quot; was underwritten by the Mormon Church and clearly intended as a &quot;rebuttal&quot; to &quot;Blood of the Prophets,&quot; at least as far as the issue of Brigham Young&#039;s guilt.  Given the book&#039;s &quot;genealogy,&quot; it is fair to address those claims without being attacked for &quot;engaging in religious bigotry.&quot; 

It&#039;s a cliché to suggest a comprehensive discussion and history of the Mormon Exodus would fill several encyclopedia volumes, so I&#039;ll only briefly note some curious examples of historical distortion that warrant scrutiny. The backdrop, of course, is the easy observation, &quot;The Mormons couldn&#039;t get along with their neighbors,&quot; and pro-LDS historians have found answering the &quot;why&quot; segment of that discussion particularly onerous and troublesome. 

Perhaps that explains the authors&#039; fanciful, &quot;Non-Mormon locals immediately resented the appointment of Mormon surveyors and Indian agents, one of whom was John D. Lee.&quot; 

In early 1850&#039;s Utah there were essentially no &quot;Non-Mormon locals,&quot; excluding Jim Bridger up in Wyoming and possibly a few other stray mountain men who were decided anti-social sorts not given to communicating with Washington. Dr. Garland Hurt, the only other possible non-Mormon &quot;candidate&quot; didn&#039;t begin his work with the Indians until 1855. And in the aftermath of the massacre, Hurt fled Utah, fearing for his life.

Some other questionable interpretations that suggest themselves: By the time of the Steptoe Expedition in 1854, the LDS practice of polygamy wasn&#039;t simply rumor. Mormons themselves &quot;announced it to the world&quot; in their fall General Conference in 1852. This followed on the heels of a modest bestseller written by Captain John W. Gunnison that appeared in the Eastern press detailing a year he&#039;d spent in Utah in 1849 doing survey work as part of the Stansbury Expedition.

Colonel Steptoe was in Utah because he&#039;d been sent there to investigate the murders of Captain Gunnison and other men under his command in 1853. Most historians attribute the killings to Pahvant (Ute) Indians, but of course rumors abounded. 

I&#039;ll repeat my observation there were very few non-Mormons in Utah circa 1849-54, and Leonard et al are in error in suggesting conflicts between Mormons and non-Mormons created the initial friction that led to hostility between the Saints and the rest of the country. A review of Brigham Young&#039;s fiery rhetoric at the time will point to more obvious origins. As in Mountain Meadows, a strong case exists for laying the blame on the LDS leader. Bagley and Bigler&#039;s &quot;The Mormon Rebellion: America&#039;s First Civil War&quot;  point overwhelmingly to that conclusion.

It&#039;s also doubtful Colonel Steptoe&#039;s men led Mormon women away at gunpoint; they were known to be fleeing impoverished conditions that included plural marriages. My own great-great grandmother arrived in this valley as young girl of 15; the LDS missionary she&#039;d fallen for in Scotland and come here seeking hadn&#039;t told her about the first wife.

Moving on to the actual massacre itself, the Paiutes&#039; oral tradition is they weren&#039;t involved, and there are credible reasons to believe few were (probably some participated, however, along with a number of &quot;freebooters&quot;). The initial attack on the Fancher-Baker train killed or seriously wounded most of the adult males in the party; Indian marksmanship with weapons they&#039;d allegedly been provided is unlikely to have been that deadly, and the Southern Utah pioneers were also crack shots. 

That should be sufficient for now; I&#039;m grateful to see Shannon Novak has chimed in. Her fantastic forensic work--done under particularly pressured circumstances--offered considerable illumination; the victims&#039; remains she examined showed most were shot in the head at close range.

In truth, a large number of factors and some powerful and credible historical sources need to be factored into this discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m no stranger to the subject of the Mountain Meadows Massacre and ten years  ago published a rebuttal to a guest editorial in Southern Utah&#8217;s St. George &#8220;Spectrum&#8221; on one aspect of the mass murders, I&#8217;m only now reading &#8220;Massacre at Mountain Meadows,&#8221; which Gilbert cited as one of the books available on that complex and controversial subject.</p>
<p>Seeing this blog, my first reaction was to post a &#8220;not intended for publication reply&#8221; to Gilbert on some claims from the Turley, Walker &amp; Leonard volume that he&#8217;d clearly summarized, and I suggested they might not hold up to some easy fact-checking. He graciously replied, and I next e-mailed Will Bagley whose post appears above. I have no doubt Will is &#8220;tired to the subject&#8221;; he should be permitted that entitlement, after what, five in-depth books and countless articles and group presentations, but he&#8217;s also a marvelous friend who&#8217;s still willing to pick up the gauntlet when necessary.  </p>
<p>Will&#8217;s material and his blunt charges against Brigham Young are available in the additional links and references he provided. Beyond noting I agree with his conclusions simply because the alternatives require too many convoluted mental leaps and &#8220;can&#8217;t be&#8221; assumptions, I&#8217;ll let others engage in that debate for the time being.</p>
<p>Equally complex and convoluted, however, are issues of &#8220;the persecution of the Saints&#8221; that form the basis of the first few chapters of Leonard et al.  &#8220;Massacre at Mountain Meadows&#8221; was underwritten by the Mormon Church and clearly intended as a &#8220;rebuttal&#8221; to &#8220;Blood of the Prophets,&#8221; at least as far as the issue of Brigham Young&#8217;s guilt.  Given the book&#8217;s &#8220;genealogy,&#8221; it is fair to address those claims without being attacked for &#8220;engaging in religious bigotry.&#8221; </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a cliché to suggest a comprehensive discussion and history of the Mormon Exodus would fill several encyclopedia volumes, so I&#8217;ll only briefly note some curious examples of historical distortion that warrant scrutiny. The backdrop, of course, is the easy observation, &#8220;The Mormons couldn&#8217;t get along with their neighbors,&#8221; and pro-LDS historians have found answering the &#8220;why&#8221; segment of that discussion particularly onerous and troublesome. </p>
<p>Perhaps that explains the authors&#8217; fanciful, &#8220;Non-Mormon locals immediately resented the appointment of Mormon surveyors and Indian agents, one of whom was John D. Lee.&#8221; </p>
<p>In early 1850&#8242;s Utah there were essentially no &#8220;Non-Mormon locals,&#8221; excluding Jim Bridger up in Wyoming and possibly a few other stray mountain men who were decided anti-social sorts not given to communicating with Washington. Dr. Garland Hurt, the only other possible non-Mormon &#8220;candidate&#8221; didn&#8217;t begin his work with the Indians until 1855. And in the aftermath of the massacre, Hurt fled Utah, fearing for his life.</p>
<p>Some other questionable interpretations that suggest themselves: By the time of the Steptoe Expedition in 1854, the LDS practice of polygamy wasn&#8217;t simply rumor. Mormons themselves &#8220;announced it to the world&#8221; in their fall General Conference in 1852. This followed on the heels of a modest bestseller written by Captain John W. Gunnison that appeared in the Eastern press detailing a year he&#8217;d spent in Utah in 1849 doing survey work as part of the Stansbury Expedition.</p>
<p>Colonel Steptoe was in Utah because he&#8217;d been sent there to investigate the murders of Captain Gunnison and other men under his command in 1853. Most historians attribute the killings to Pahvant (Ute) Indians, but of course rumors abounded. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll repeat my observation there were very few non-Mormons in Utah circa 1849-54, and Leonard et al are in error in suggesting conflicts between Mormons and non-Mormons created the initial friction that led to hostility between the Saints and the rest of the country. A review of Brigham Young&#8217;s fiery rhetoric at the time will point to more obvious origins. As in Mountain Meadows, a strong case exists for laying the blame on the LDS leader. Bagley and Bigler&#8217;s &#8220;The Mormon Rebellion: America&#8217;s First Civil War&#8221;  point overwhelmingly to that conclusion.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also doubtful Colonel Steptoe&#8217;s men led Mormon women away at gunpoint; they were known to be fleeing impoverished conditions that included plural marriages. My own great-great grandmother arrived in this valley as young girl of 15; the LDS missionary she&#8217;d fallen for in Scotland and come here seeking hadn&#8217;t told her about the first wife.</p>
<p>Moving on to the actual massacre itself, the Paiutes&#8217; oral tradition is they weren&#8217;t involved, and there are credible reasons to believe few were (probably some participated, however, along with a number of &#8220;freebooters&#8221;). The initial attack on the Fancher-Baker train killed or seriously wounded most of the adult males in the party; Indian marksmanship with weapons they&#8217;d allegedly been provided is unlikely to have been that deadly, and the Southern Utah pioneers were also crack shots. </p>
<p>That should be sufficient for now; I&#8217;m grateful to see Shannon Novak has chimed in. Her fantastic forensic work&#8211;done under particularly pressured circumstances&#8211;offered considerable illumination; the victims&#8217; remains she examined showed most were shot in the head at close range.</p>
<p>In truth, a large number of factors and some powerful and credible historical sources need to be factored into this discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Bagley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/2012/02/the-aftermath-of-mountain-meadows/#comment-1589</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Bagley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 23:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/?p=5288#comment-1589</guid>
		<description>&quot;Much has been written, and will be continue to be written, about this horror, as it stands as a timeless, universal caution to the murderous ownership of truth, of how good men conjure evil in the name of god and can become so invested in their own cover-up that in time they become the only people who believe it.&quot; So wrote Logan Heber in the best recent look at Mountain Meadows:

Logan Hebner and Michael L. Plyler. &quot;Southern Paiute: A Portrait.&quot; Logan: Utah State University Press, 2010, page 9.

I&#039;m as tired to the subject as Juanita Brooks was, but have written my share of commentary on the atrocity, but I&#039;ve written a lot about it since 2002.

Bagley, Will. “’They Have Slain My Children’: The Rescue of the Orphans of Mountain Meadows.”  Wild West 17:5 (February 2005), 28–36.

Bagley, Will. “Big Trouble: The Legacy of Mountain Meadows.”  Wild West 20:3 (October 2007), 50–57.

David L. Bigler and Will Bagley. The Mormon Rebellion: America’s First Civil War. Norman: The University of Oklahoma, 2011.

Dave and I also published &quot;Innocent Blood: Essential Narratives of the Mountain Meadows Massacre&quot; (Norman: The Arthur H. Clark Company, 2008).

Finally, later thoughts on why Brigham Young did it are in Deborah Lawrence and Jon Lawrence, eds. &quot;Violent Encounters: Interviews on Western Massacres.&quot;  Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2011. An early edit of the interview, along with Dave Bigler&#039;s &quot;Terror on the Trail: The Massacre at Mountain Meadows&quot; is available at:

www.oldspanishtrail.org/assets/downloads/Vol12-12006.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Much has been written, and will be continue to be written, about this horror, as it stands as a timeless, universal caution to the murderous ownership of truth, of how good men conjure evil in the name of god and can become so invested in their own cover-up that in time they become the only people who believe it.&#8221; So wrote Logan Heber in the best recent look at Mountain Meadows:</p>
<p>Logan Hebner and Michael L. Plyler. &#8220;Southern Paiute: A Portrait.&#8221; Logan: Utah State University Press, 2010, page 9.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m as tired to the subject as Juanita Brooks was, but have written my share of commentary on the atrocity, but I&#8217;ve written a lot about it since 2002.</p>
<p>Bagley, Will. “’They Have Slain My Children’: The Rescue of the Orphans of Mountain Meadows.”  Wild West 17:5 (February 2005), 28–36.</p>
<p>Bagley, Will. “Big Trouble: The Legacy of Mountain Meadows.”  Wild West 20:3 (October 2007), 50–57.</p>
<p>David L. Bigler and Will Bagley. The Mormon Rebellion: America’s First Civil War. Norman: The University of Oklahoma, 2011.</p>
<p>Dave and I also published &#8220;Innocent Blood: Essential Narratives of the Mountain Meadows Massacre&#8221; (Norman: The Arthur H. Clark Company, 2008).</p>
<p>Finally, later thoughts on why Brigham Young did it are in Deborah Lawrence and Jon Lawrence, eds. &#8220;Violent Encounters: Interviews on Western Massacres.&#8221;  Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2011. An early edit of the interview, along with Dave Bigler&#8217;s &#8220;Terror on the Trail: The Massacre at Mountain Meadows&#8221; is available at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oldspanishtrail.org/assets/downloads/Vol12-12006.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.oldspanishtrail.org/assets/downloads/Vol12-12006.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold W. Simons</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/2012/02/the-aftermath-of-mountain-meadows/#comment-1551</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold W. Simons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 19:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/?p=5288#comment-1551</guid>
		<description>The list of pertinent books fails to include the very early, very scholarly book by Juanita Brooks, The Mountain Meadows Massacre, the first edition of which was published at Stanford, California by the Stanford University Press in 1950, and the second edition published at Norman, Oklahoma by the University of Oklahoma Press in 1962.

The impact this had on Juanita Brooks life is included in an article written by Davis Bitton and Maureen Ursenbach titled: “Riding Herd: A Conversation with Juanita Brooks” which was published in Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 9, no.1 (Spring 1974): pp 11-33.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The list of pertinent books fails to include the very early, very scholarly book by Juanita Brooks, The Mountain Meadows Massacre, the first edition of which was published at Stanford, California by the Stanford University Press in 1950, and the second edition published at Norman, Oklahoma by the University of Oklahoma Press in 1962.</p>
<p>The impact this had on Juanita Brooks life is included in an article written by Davis Bitton and Maureen Ursenbach titled: “Riding Herd: A Conversation with Juanita Brooks” which was published in Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 9, no.1 (Spring 1974): pp 11-33.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilbert King</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/2012/02/the-aftermath-of-mountain-meadows/#comment-1546</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/?p=5288#comment-1546</guid>
		<description>Hi, Ms. Denton.  The sourcing has been corrected to reflect Alfred A. Knopf as publisher of your book.  I had cited from the 2003 British edition. Thanks for pointing this out.  --Gilbert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Ms. Denton.  The sourcing has been corrected to reflect Alfred A. Knopf as publisher of your book.  I had cited from the 2003 British edition. Thanks for pointing this out.  &#8211;Gilbert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Novak</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/2012/02/the-aftermath-of-mountain-meadows/#comment-1545</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Novak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/?p=5288#comment-1545</guid>
		<description>You may also want to look at my book, which details the history of the victims, including the findings from the skeletal remains accidentally unearthed in 1999.

Novak, Shannon A.  (2008)  House of Mourning: A Biocultural History of the Mountain Meadows Massacre.  Salt Lake City:  University of Utah Press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may also want to look at my book, which details the history of the victims, including the findings from the skeletal remains accidentally unearthed in 1999.</p>
<p>Novak, Shannon A.  (2008)  House of Mourning: A Biocultural History of the Mountain Meadows Massacre.  Salt Lake City:  University of Utah Press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally Denton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/2012/02/the-aftermath-of-mountain-meadows/#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally Denton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/?p=5288#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>Hi Gilbert King,
Good piece.
I&#039;m wondering why the publisher of my book, &quot;American Massacre,&quot; is not listed as Alfred Knopf?  I&#039;m not sure I&#039;ve ever seen a Martin Secker &amp; Warburg edition. 
Sally Denton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gilbert King,<br />
Good piece.<br />
I&#8217;m wondering why the publisher of my book, &#8220;American Massacre,&#8221; is not listed as Alfred Knopf?  I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ve ever seen a Martin Secker &amp; Warburg edition.<br />
Sally Denton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilbert King</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/2012/02/the-aftermath-of-mountain-meadows/#comment-1541</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 02:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/?p=5288#comment-1541</guid>
		<description>Hi, Jennifer.  &quot;Lynching&quot; was usually done by rope back in the day, but a lynching is generally defined by the actions of a mob, executing someone outside the court system, whether it&#039;s by hanging, shooting, or drowning.  And if you&#039;re in Utah, you can visit the LDS Church Historical Museum and see the gun that Joseph Smith used to fire back at the mob in Carthage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Jennifer.  &#8220;Lynching&#8221; was usually done by rope back in the day, but a lynching is generally defined by the actions of a mob, executing someone outside the court system, whether it&#8217;s by hanging, shooting, or drowning.  And if you&#8217;re in Utah, you can visit the LDS Church Historical Museum and see the gun that Joseph Smith used to fire back at the mob in Carthage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/2012/02/the-aftermath-of-mountain-meadows/#comment-1540</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/history/?p=5288#comment-1540</guid>
		<description>Just a quick clarification.  Joseph Smith was shot in Carthage Jail by a mob not lynched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick clarification.  Joseph Smith was shot in Carthage Jail by a mob not lynched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
