<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four Species of Homo You&#8217;ve Never Heard Of</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/2012/04/four-species-of-homo-youve-never-heard-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/2012/04/four-species-of-homo-youve-never-heard-of/</link>
	<description>Meet the members of the tangled human family tree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:56:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/2012/04/four-species-of-homo-youve-never-heard-of/#comment-965</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/?p=836#comment-965</guid>
		<description>^Praise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^Praise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/2012/04/four-species-of-homo-youve-never-heard-of/#comment-960</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 18:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/?p=836#comment-960</guid>
		<description>Bobby - You may want to re-think your path of thinking when hearing the word homo. &#039;Homo&#039; by definition is a genus of great apes (including homo sapiens - that would be humans) and the word should not be &quot;re-thought&quot;. Why should science change their words because idiots and bigots use a scientific word to be jerks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bobby &#8211; You may want to re-think your path of thinking when hearing the word homo. &#8216;Homo&#8217; by definition is a genus of great apes (including homo sapiens &#8211; that would be humans) and the word should not be &#8220;re-thought&#8221;. Why should science change their words because idiots and bigots use a scientific word to be jerks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/2012/04/four-species-of-homo-youve-never-heard-of/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>Blob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 06:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/?p=836#comment-919</guid>
		<description>Homo means man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Homo means man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/2012/04/four-species-of-homo-youve-never-heard-of/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/?p=836#comment-836</guid>
		<description>You may want to re-think your title for this article...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may want to re-think your title for this article&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
