<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Homo antecessor: Common Ancestor of Humans and Neanderthals?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/2012/11/homo-antecessor-common-ancestor-of-humans-and-neanderthals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/2012/11/homo-antecessor-common-ancestor-of-humans-and-neanderthals/</link>
	<description>Meet the members of the tangled human family tree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:56:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Gomez DUFC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/2012/11/homo-antecessor-common-ancestor-of-humans-and-neanderthals/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Gomez DUFC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 11:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/?p=2357#comment-1041</guid>
		<description>Aye well respected anthropologists too! No bother though, the blogs are always interesting, so keep it up! On a slightly different tangent keep a look out for Area 240 discoveries in 2013. An interesting case of Achuelian and Prepared Core flints coming out of the North Sea... Publications are forthcoming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aye well respected anthropologists too! No bother though, the blogs are always interesting, so keep it up! On a slightly different tangent keep a look out for Area 240 discoveries in 2013. An interesting case of Achuelian and Prepared Core flints coming out of the North Sea&#8230; Publications are forthcoming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin Wayman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/2012/11/homo-antecessor-common-ancestor-of-humans-and-neanderthals/#comment-1027</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Wayman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/?p=2357#comment-1027</guid>
		<description>Yes, you are correct. I apologize for the error and should have said that some anthropologists believe H. antecessor made those stone tools. I&#039;ve fixed the error. Thanks for pointing it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you are correct. I apologize for the error and should have said that some anthropologists believe H. antecessor made those stone tools. I&#8217;ve fixed the error. Thanks for pointing it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Gomez</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/2012/11/homo-antecessor-common-ancestor-of-humans-and-neanderthals/#comment-1025</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Gomez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/?p=2357#comment-1025</guid>
		<description>I check this blog alot, but it should be noted no human fossil remains have been recorded at Happisburgh, just worked flint remains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I check this blog alot, but it should be noted no human fossil remains have been recorded at Happisburgh, just worked flint remains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raimo Kangasniemi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/2012/11/homo-antecessor-common-ancestor-of-humans-and-neanderthals/#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator>Raimo Kangasniemi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/?p=2357#comment-1010</guid>
		<description>Homo antecessor could also be seen as just the European variant, at most a sub-species in this view, of Homo erectus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Homo antecessor could also be seen as just the European variant, at most a sub-species in this view, of Homo erectus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
