<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brand New</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/ideas/2011/08/brand-new/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/ideas/2011/08/brand-new/</link>
	<description>How human ingenuity is changing the way we live</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:22:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/ideas/2011/08/brand-new/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>PJK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/ideas/?p=134#comment-223</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d noticed some of these examples of mutant logos, but this post really pieces together the trend and its meaning in a way that I haven&#039;t seen before. The thread that leads from GAP to Greenpeace&#039;s DIY agitprop appropriation of corporate logos and the protean Google nameplate is just fascinating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d noticed some of these examples of mutant logos, but this post really pieces together the trend and its meaning in a way that I haven&#8217;t seen before. The thread that leads from GAP to Greenpeace&#8217;s DIY agitprop appropriation of corporate logos and the protean Google nameplate is just fascinating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beverly Jones</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/ideas/2011/08/brand-new/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Beverly Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/ideas/?p=134#comment-221</guid>
		<description>You are correct.  It is indeed all about building -- and nurturing -- relationships.  A logo should trigger a sense of recognition, a feeling of ownership.  What is great about the shifting Google logo is that the familiar writing is imbedded within the timely, appealing imagery.  You know instantly that the message is from Google, then you want to see what they&#039;re talking about today.  When it all works, innovation does come at the expense of familiarity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct.  It is indeed all about building &#8212; and nurturing &#8212; relationships.  A logo should trigger a sense of recognition, a feeling of ownership.  What is great about the shifting Google logo is that the familiar writing is imbedded within the timely, appealing imagery.  You know instantly that the message is from Google, then you want to see what they&#8217;re talking about today.  When it all works, innovation does come at the expense of familiarity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
