<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Augmented Reality Livens up Museums</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/ideas/2012/08/augmented-reality-livens-up-museums/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/ideas/2012/08/augmented-reality-livens-up-museums/</link>
	<description>How human ingenuity is changing the way we live</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:28:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crispin Hoult</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/ideas/2012/08/augmented-reality-livens-up-museums/comment-page-1/#comment-1022</link>
		<dc:creator>Crispin Hoult</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/ideas/?p=3388#comment-1022</guid>
		<description>Mobile is becoming a disruptive factor in culture and heritage but the impact is still misunderstood.
Retail understand that WiFi and browsing doesn&#039;t mean loss of sales but more time in the shop, museums can still be afraid that the screen is a distraction and not an enhancement to the experience.
I like the spin on &quot;Do Touch&quot; from The Walters (http://thewalters.org/news/releases/pressdetail.aspx?e_id=333) and we are working engaging experiences at QRMuseum.com - watch the full video!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mobile is becoming a disruptive factor in culture and heritage but the impact is still misunderstood.<br />
Retail understand that WiFi and browsing doesn&#8217;t mean loss of sales but more time in the shop, museums can still be afraid that the screen is a distraction and not an enhancement to the experience.<br />
I like the spin on &#8220;Do Touch&#8221; from The Walters (<a href="http://thewalters.org/news/releases/pressdetail.aspx?e_id=333" rel="nofollow">http://thewalters.org/news/releases/pressdetail.aspx?e_id=333</a>) and we are working engaging experiences at QRMuseum.com &#8211; watch the full video!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Rieland</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/ideas/2012/08/augmented-reality-livens-up-museums/comment-page-1/#comment-1021</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Rieland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/ideas/?p=3388#comment-1021</guid>
		<description>Because Google didn&#039;t make them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because Google didn&#8217;t make them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Rodgers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/ideas/2012/08/augmented-reality-livens-up-museums/comment-page-1/#comment-1020</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Rodgers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/ideas/?p=3388#comment-1020</guid>
		<description>Augmented reality, creative non-fiction, outright lies, how much are we blurring them? And why did it take 50 years after I needed them for glasses to become cool?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Augmented reality, creative non-fiction, outright lies, how much are we blurring them? And why did it take 50 years after I needed them for glasses to become cool?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
