December 29, 2011
The Future’s War on Cancer

One in a series of 1930s promotional cards for Max Cigarettes (No. 6. War on Cancer)
This month marks the 40th anniversary of the formal declaration of the War on Cancer. When President Richard Nixon signed the National Cancer Act on December 23, 1971 he described the legislation as a “national commitment for the conquest of cancer.” The Act expanded federal funding for cancer research and Nixon said that he hoped, “in the years ahead that we may look back on this day and this action as being the most significant action taken during this Administration.”
The term, “war on cancer” wasn’t coined in the 1970s but dates back at least to the early 1900s. Somewhat ironically, a series of promotional cards packaged with cigarettes in the 1930s included a card that explained how the latest cutting edge technology could help win the “War on Cancer.”
When scientists first begin to create synthetic radio-activity, to make substitutes for radium, by bombarding certain atoms with millions of electron-volts, someone suggested, “Why make radium to cure cancer? Use the bombarding atoms direct.” This suggestion was adopted by the use of very high voltage X-rays. Many successful experiments have been made.
The 1956 book 1999: Our Hopeful Future by Victor Cohn includes a chapter called “Medicine’s promise: long, lively life.” Cohn was a science and health reporter at the Minneapolis Tribune before moving to the Washington Post in 1968 and began writing a weekly health column called “The Patient’s Advocate.” In his book, Cohn doesn’t mince words when articulating the optimism people of the 1950s had for medical breakthroughs:
If any field is on the move today, it is medicine. If any offers hope and promise to average people, this is it. Medicine today outdates much of the medicine of ten years ago, or five years, or one. A number of diseases are being conquered, and new keys are opening biological doors. Average life expectancy, today at an all-time high, could in our generation increase ten more years.
Cohn goes on to explain how people thought a cancer cure might be found:
In cancer a possibility is surgical meddling with glands. Surgeons are already removing adrenal glands in experiments to treat prostate and breast cancer. Medicine feverishly seeks to identify the chemical environment that permits uncontrolled cell growth, and to understand how cells grow. Uncontrolled growth is the one element common to all cancers.
The 1973 book 1994: The World of Tomorrow published by U.S. News and World Report includes a chapter on what people can expect of medicine by the mid-1990s. While the book is optimistic, it doesn’t have the same faith that Cohn had in the 1950s. Dr. Michael B. Shimkin, whose population studies at the National Cancer Institute in the 1950s would help show a link between smoking and lung cancer, is quoted in the book:
Although truly useful drugs for the treatment of cancer are still in the future, there is no reason but to be optimistic that they eventually will be found… Cancer research is but a small segment of the total human endeavor in biomedical sciences. It can advance only as rapidly as progress is recorded in the various “disciplines,” where the boundaries are academic conveniences… Cancer research has no place for limited or fixed concepts, for vested interests, for orthodoxy. But we can stand firm on this: cancer is a solvable problem, solvable by a human thought and action process that we call scientific research, and within capabilities of human intelligence with which man was endowed by his Creator.
Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.
10 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI























We are closer to a cure than people think…weird that Dr. Burzynski’s treatment is never mentioned when it comes to treating, and beating, cancer. Call him a quack if you will, but his treatment is currently in clinical trials and at least offers more hope than any other treatment today.
@Cheryl The FDA’s 2009 warning letter to Dr. Burzynski: http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/2009/ucm192711.htm
It’s a pity that there is so much hype about cancer “cures,” along with other medical progress and scientific “breakthroughs,” because it encourages a skeptical outsider to suppose that it’s all lies and nothing is being accomplished. The quote from the 1950′s that life expectancy “could in our generation increase another ten years” was demonstrably wrong; the correct number was closer to four years. I think four years increase in a generation (an improvement which is continuing fairly steadily into the present) is pretty good.
There have been genuine cures for cancer for the last one hundred years. Dr Burzynski is just one of many. Today there are some extremely high-tech, cutting edge cures as well if you know where to look. This is ‘cure’ as in all gone, not just in remission.
@Richard actually Cohn was right about life expectancy. In 1956 US life expectancy was 69 and in 2009 it was 77, which is about ten years. If you think of a generation as a period of about 15 years then you’re right, he is wrong, but he’s still right in the sense that most of the people alive in 1956 did indeed live about ten years longer than they would have if medicine had stayed at 1950s levels.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus10.pdf#022
Royal Raymond Rife had the right path in 1930 with his 60,000x optical microscope able to look at living cancer cells and other viruses (we look at dead tissue today). He also demonstrated to a group of USC and other powerful doctors from the US (with an announcement following of “the cure for all disease has been demonstrated”) about matching the vibrating wall membrane of different viruses etc. Finding the correct frequency smashes the wall instantly and thus kills the virus, ie cancer etc. The road since Raymond Rife has been to close the door on the solution and open the door to maintenance based medicine. So if your looking for a cure don’t hold your breath, you might ask what happened to the most powerful non destructive microscope ever built went though (over 58,000 hand made parts)! I think its in the smithsonian black ops warehouse:(
ps of the 16 terminal patients monitored under Rife’s care by USC and other physicians 14 were cured during the 3 month trial the other 2 were cured a few weeks after, 100% success in 1930, not too shabby!
A “cure” for many cancers should lose it’s “quotes” since many do already exist. Perhaps when the Medical Mafia has decided they’ve made enough money on keeping people ill and dying, they’ll release these cures to humans. Perhaps.
Cancer continues to be big business. Llok at the $$ spent on advertising FOR Cancer Paience.
Our daughter passed from Leukemia…It came on sudden and was type -o-… They went ahead with Chemo, they went ahead with the Bone Marrow Transplant…. And they said it was enviromental….
Doctors never achieve the status of being PROFessional.. Thats why they are always Practicing.
By the way, It was not the Leukemia that killed her.
It was the Graft VS Host… The treatment