<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Astrologers Predict 1929 Will Be Year of Prosperity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/astrologers-predict-1929-will-be-year-of-prosperity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/astrologers-predict-1929-will-be-year-of-prosperity/</link>
	<description>A history of the future that never was</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:40:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubba</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/astrologers-predict-1929-will-be-year-of-prosperity/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 20:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=2115#comment-577</guid>
		<description>Of course there will always be something that causes astrology predictions to be wrong.   Guessing is always a 50/50 thing regardless of what useless information you choose to add to your selection process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course there will always be something that causes astrology predictions to be wrong.   Guessing is always a 50/50 thing regardless of what useless information you choose to add to your selection process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/astrologers-predict-1929-will-be-year-of-prosperity/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 17:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=2115#comment-448</guid>
		<description>Silly astrologers. You mean they couldn&#039;t predict the discovery that the discovery of pluto just 2 years later would throw off their predictions?  I&#039;m shocked to hear that astrology is such an inexact pseudoscience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silly astrologers. You mean they couldn&#8217;t predict the discovery that the discovery of pluto just 2 years later would throw off their predictions?  I&#8217;m shocked to hear that astrology is such an inexact pseudoscience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moonchildiva</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/astrologers-predict-1929-will-be-year-of-prosperity/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>Moonchildiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=2115#comment-443</guid>
		<description>Pluto IS considered a planet by astrologers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pluto IS considered a planet by astrologers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/astrologers-predict-1929-will-be-year-of-prosperity/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=2115#comment-442</guid>
		<description>Pluto is no longer considered a planet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pluto is no longer considered a planet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thorfin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/astrologers-predict-1929-will-be-year-of-prosperity/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorfin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=2115#comment-440</guid>
		<description>Of course, the predictions were wrong.  The chart could not be completed correctly as the astrologer was not able to determine which zodiac sign Pluto was in.

Pluto would not be discovered until February 1930.

These days Astrology is 100% accurate because we have all nine planets to chart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, the predictions were wrong.  The chart could not be completed correctly as the astrologer was not able to determine which zodiac sign Pluto was in.</p>
<p>Pluto would not be discovered until February 1930.</p>
<p>These days Astrology is 100% accurate because we have all nine planets to chart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
