<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Resurrecting the Dead With Computer Graphics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/resurrecting-the-dead-with-computer-graphics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/resurrecting-the-dead-with-computer-graphics/</link>
	<description>A history of the future that never was</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:40:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/resurrecting-the-dead-with-computer-graphics/#comment-2190</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=2396#comment-2190</guid>
		<description>I agree with dog, with the added question of, &quot;how dare we?&quot; It seems disrespectful (to say the least) to digitally resurrect someone who, being dead, has no capacity to consent to whatever performance they are being made to give. The whole idea just grosses me out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with dog, with the added question of, &#8220;how dare we?&#8221; It seems disrespectful (to say the least) to digitally resurrect someone who, being dead, has no capacity to consent to whatever performance they are being made to give. The whole idea just grosses me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/resurrecting-the-dead-with-computer-graphics/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=2396#comment-767</guid>
		<description>I would like to see Marilyn Monroe&#039;s last, uncompleted film, SOMETHING&#039;S GOT TO GIVE, completed but too much material of any star recreated this way would cause me to lose interest.  With SOMETHING&#039;S GOT TO GIVE, we already have real footage of a film that truly begs for completion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see Marilyn Monroe&#8217;s last, uncompleted film, SOMETHING&#8217;S GOT TO GIVE, completed but too much material of any star recreated this way would cause me to lose interest.  With SOMETHING&#8217;S GOT TO GIVE, we already have real footage of a film that truly begs for completion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/resurrecting-the-dead-with-computer-graphics/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=2396#comment-593</guid>
		<description>I find the whole idea of &quot;resurrecting&quot; the dead and making them perform for us to be intensely distasteful. These aren&#039;t just characters on a screen--these were real human beings who lived and died and had their own hopes and dreams and fears. And for actors and other artists, that&#039;s a huge part of what made their work so enduring.

Computer-generated resurrections have an effect similar to watching someone puppeteer a corpse. I&#039;m not just referring to the uncanny valley, but seeing a seemingly &quot;live&quot; version of someone you know is quite dead, whose performance is being created by someone else. There&#039;s no reason for it that doesn&#039;t come across as really gross--it&#039;s either a cash grab or a refusal to let go of an idol. There is no role that could be played by Marilyn Monroe&#039;s digital ghost that couldn&#039;t be played just as well (or better) by a living actress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the whole idea of &#8220;resurrecting&#8221; the dead and making them perform for us to be intensely distasteful. These aren&#8217;t just characters on a screen&#8211;these were real human beings who lived and died and had their own hopes and dreams and fears. And for actors and other artists, that&#8217;s a huge part of what made their work so enduring.</p>
<p>Computer-generated resurrections have an effect similar to watching someone puppeteer a corpse. I&#8217;m not just referring to the uncanny valley, but seeing a seemingly &#8220;live&#8221; version of someone you know is quite dead, whose performance is being created by someone else. There&#8217;s no reason for it that doesn&#8217;t come across as really gross&#8211;it&#8217;s either a cash grab or a refusal to let go of an idol. There is no role that could be played by Marilyn Monroe&#8217;s digital ghost that couldn&#8217;t be played just as well (or better) by a living actress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corbin Supak</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/resurrecting-the-dead-with-computer-graphics/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Corbin Supak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=2396#comment-514</guid>
		<description>I think we will continue to see this. I&#039;m waiting for the first performer who is completely synthesized, and has no reportable &#039;death&#039; - that&#039;s the ultimate cash cow for the entertainment industry. Animation icons, of course, have this advantage already. But for humans, I think it could be someone like Tom Cruise, who gradually morphs into a synthetic, and we just don&#039;t get to see the aging version, only the &#039;healthy adult&#039; version that we are used to who continues to perform in film after film. Don&#039;t know how promotion gets handled, but hey - the more that&#039;s online, the more it can feature synthesized subjects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we will continue to see this. I&#8217;m waiting for the first performer who is completely synthesized, and has no reportable &#8216;death&#8217; &#8211; that&#8217;s the ultimate cash cow for the entertainment industry. Animation icons, of course, have this advantage already. But for humans, I think it could be someone like Tom Cruise, who gradually morphs into a synthetic, and we just don&#8217;t get to see the aging version, only the &#8216;healthy adult&#8217; version that we are used to who continues to perform in film after film. Don&#8217;t know how promotion gets handled, but hey &#8211; the more that&#8217;s online, the more it can feature synthesized subjects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/resurrecting-the-dead-with-computer-graphics/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 07:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=2396#comment-509</guid>
		<description>Its alittle controversial to some seeing long dead stars resurrected. I don&#039;t know the legalities of such a thing but movies are technically resurrected all the time. Like a release of Wizard of Oz on Blu Ray etc. I surmise the same will occur in the future while old classics make their jump to new medium, first 3d recreations like Titanic. Then holographic and later interactive. When movies become interactive immersions where audiences can branch off and make their own alternate ending to movies like Gone with the Wind, the lines will be blurred between what is allowed by post humorous performances of late stars of the yesteryear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its alittle controversial to some seeing long dead stars resurrected. I don&#8217;t know the legalities of such a thing but movies are technically resurrected all the time. Like a release of Wizard of Oz on Blu Ray etc. I surmise the same will occur in the future while old classics make their jump to new medium, first 3d recreations like Titanic. Then holographic and later interactive. When movies become interactive immersions where audiences can branch off and make their own alternate ending to movies like Gone with the Wind, the lines will be blurred between what is allowed by post humorous performances of late stars of the yesteryear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucifar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/resurrecting-the-dead-with-computer-graphics/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucifar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 16:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=2396#comment-483</guid>
		<description>this is really stupid, the dead are dead, why want to bring them back to life</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is really stupid, the dead are dead, why want to bring them back to life</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/resurrecting-the-dead-with-computer-graphics/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 14:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=2396#comment-482</guid>
		<description>Why do we need to resurrect anybody?  Is not the interest in potentially doing so not a sign of the paucity of true acting talent available today?  Our current crop of talent is not good enough, attractive enough, charming enough to hold our interest?  We have to bring the dead back to life?  I suspect this is either nostalgic narcissism, or narcissistic nostalgia.  Either way, it&#039;s a bad commentary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do we need to resurrect anybody?  Is not the interest in potentially doing so not a sign of the paucity of true acting talent available today?  Our current crop of talent is not good enough, attractive enough, charming enough to hold our interest?  We have to bring the dead back to life?  I suspect this is either nostalgic narcissism, or narcissistic nostalgia.  Either way, it&#8217;s a bad commentary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/resurrecting-the-dead-with-computer-graphics/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 21:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=2396#comment-481</guid>
		<description>No technology could duplicate distinctive voices like those of Gregory Peck or Gary Cooper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No technology could duplicate distinctive voices like those of Gregory Peck or Gary Cooper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/resurrecting-the-dead-with-computer-graphics/#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 20:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=2396#comment-480</guid>
		<description>This was all before the &quot;Uncanny Valley&quot; was truly appreciated.  Getting a simulated person sufficiently close to real to avoid the UV is a seriously difficult problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was all before the &#8220;Uncanny Valley&#8221; was truly appreciated.  Getting a simulated person sufficiently close to real to avoid the UV is a seriously difficult problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benoit</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/resurrecting-the-dead-with-computer-graphics/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>Benoit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 17:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=2396#comment-479</guid>
		<description>Instead of resurrecting the dead, I see more interest to stage actors more young than they are . Imagine Lauren Bacall playing herself in a movie today and looking 25 !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of resurrecting the dead, I see more interest to stage actors more young than they are . Imagine Lauren Bacall playing herself in a movie today and looking 25 !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
