<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recapping ‘The Jetsons’: Episode 08 – Rosey&#8217;s Boyfriend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/11/recapping-the-jetsons-episode-08-roseys-boyfriend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/11/recapping-the-jetsons-episode-08-roseys-boyfriend/</link>
	<description>A history of the future that never was</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:40:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/11/recapping-the-jetsons-episode-08-roseys-boyfriend/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 03:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=5645#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>As opposed to a maid WITH tears?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As opposed to a maid WITH tears?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/11/recapping-the-jetsons-episode-08-roseys-boyfriend/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 01:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=5645#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>i also liked the 1911 ralph 124c41+. no robot,but period social sterotypes projected into a world of skype,flying cars, personal space travel, maglev trains undersea etc.

Also, the Skylark series of the 1930&#039;s---&quot; Get your hands off the ftl drive, you big ape&quot;;&quot;Activating force beams.&quot;; &quot;Now,you are cooking with gas&quot;. This was echoed in the 1990&#039;s series Stargate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i also liked the 1911 ralph 124c41+. no robot,but period social sterotypes projected into a world of skype,flying cars, personal space travel, maglev trains undersea etc.</p>
<p>Also, the Skylark series of the 1930&#8242;s&#8212;&#8221; Get your hands off the ftl drive, you big ape&#8221;;&#8221;Activating force beams.&#8221;; &#8220;Now,you are cooking with gas&#8221;. This was echoed in the 1990&#8242;s series Stargate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/11/recapping-the-jetsons-episode-08-roseys-boyfriend/#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 01:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=5645#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>in fact, the jetsons mirrored the flintstones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in fact, the jetsons mirrored the flintstones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/11/recapping-the-jetsons-episode-08-roseys-boyfriend/#comment-1044</link>
		<dc:creator>susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 01:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=5645#comment-1044</guid>
		<description>robby the robot, in forbidden planet, predates these.
robby does housework, makes dresses, and has a human personality.
  As a child of the period, the most amusing thing about the jetsons, and startrek, was the 1950-1970 social sterotypes projected into the far future. As a scifi reader,i knew this intended satire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>robby the robot, in forbidden planet, predates these.<br />
robby does housework, makes dresses, and has a human personality.<br />
  As a child of the period, the most amusing thing about the jetsons, and startrek, was the 1950-1970 social sterotypes projected into the far future. As a scifi reader,i knew this intended satire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt L</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/11/recapping-the-jetsons-episode-08-roseys-boyfriend/#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=5645#comment-1039</guid>
		<description>I was, and still am, most amused by the phrase &quot;Most ut&quot; that Rosey uses after she hears Judy say &quot;utmost&quot; about a boy. I believe George or Jane repeat it at the end also. Another amusing part of the episode is Rosey parodying Judy&#039;s moods in love and not in love. I still laugh at those two parts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was, and still am, most amused by the phrase &#8220;Most ut&#8221; that Rosey uses after she hears Judy say &#8220;utmost&#8221; about a boy. I believe George or Jane repeat it at the end also. Another amusing part of the episode is Rosey parodying Judy&#8217;s moods in love and not in love. I still laugh at those two parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wutzke</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/11/recapping-the-jetsons-episode-08-roseys-boyfriend/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>Wutzke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=5645#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>The &quot;Maid Without Tears&quot; also seems to be a maid with a couple major trip hazards hanging off her waistband... and scary that Miss Honeywell was advertised in at least one ad not merely as a robotic maid, but as a robotic *housewife*.  Yikes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Maid Without Tears&#8221; also seems to be a maid with a couple major trip hazards hanging off her waistband&#8230; and scary that Miss Honeywell was advertised in at least one ad not merely as a robotic maid, but as a robotic *housewife*.  Yikes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnD</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/11/recapping-the-jetsons-episode-08-roseys-boyfriend/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=5645#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>We may never get a Rosie. Instead, we&#039;ll get dozens of smaller, simpler robots, each suited to a single task (dusting, dish washing, vacuuming, etc.). This will happen because it is much, much easier to perform a specific process than to perform a general one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We may never get a Rosie. Instead, we&#8217;ll get dozens of smaller, simpler robots, each suited to a single task (dusting, dish washing, vacuuming, etc.). This will happen because it is much, much easier to perform a specific process than to perform a general one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
