<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>Paleofuture &#187; Family Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/category/family-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture</link>
	<description>A history of the future that never was</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 18:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>$18 for a Dozen Eggs by 2010? Inflation Fears in 1982</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2013/05/18-for-a-dozen-eggs-by-2010-inflation-fears-in-1982/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2013/05/18-for-a-dozen-eggs-by-2010-inflation-fears-in-1982/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 13:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Novak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1980s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=9245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Omni Future Almanac predicted that a gallon of gas would be cheaper than a quart of milk]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9262" title="1982 omni almanac 470x251" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2013/05/1982-omni-almanac-470x251.jpg" alt="" width="0" height="0" /></p>
<div id="attachment_9259" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 205px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9259" title="1982 omni future almanac cover sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2013/05/1982-omni-future-almanac-cover-sm-205x300.jpeg" alt="" width="205" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Cover of the 1982 book Omni Future Almanac (Source: Novak Archive)</p></div>
<p>The <a href="http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Omni_future_almanac.html?id=ohshAAAAMAAJ"><em>Omni Future Almanac</em></a> was published in 1982 &#8212; a year when America would see double-digit inflation and double-digit unemployment. Despite all this, the authors of the book were generally optimistic about the future of the nation. Technology, they explained, would solve many of the problems facing the country. In conjunction with this, the American people would surely worker smarter and simplify their lives, all while improving everyone&#8217;s standard of living.</p>
<p>From the book:</p>
<blockquote><p>By 2000, most Americans will be experiencing a new prosperity. The problems of shrinking energy supplies and spiraling costs will be offset by developments in computers, genetic engineering, and service industries that will bring about lifestyle changes that will in turn boost the economy. Basically, Americans will be able to simplify their lives and spend less money supporting themselves. Indeed, energy conservation will force Americans to become more resourceful fiscally and to spend less on many items.</p></blockquote>
<p>But what about prices of the future? That double-digit inflation stoked fears that prices for common food items in the future would skyrocket.</p>
<p>The average price of a pound of beef in the year 2010? The book predicted it would be $22.75. The actual cost? About $3.75.</p>
<p>The prices of a loaf of bread? They predicted it would hit $8. Actual cost? About $2.50.</p>
<p>But which single commodity did they predict would level out in the 21st century? Somewhat shockingly, gasoline.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s right, the book predicted that a gallon of gas (which cost about $1 in 1980) would peak at $4 in 1990 and then level off to $2 not only in the year 2000 but maintain that price into the year 2010 as well.</p>
<div id="attachment_9250" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-9250" title="1982 Omni Future Almanac effects of inflation" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2013/05/1982-Omni-Future-Almanac-effects-of-inflation.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="731" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Chart from the 1982 book Omni Future Almanac predicting the cost of future goods</p></div>
<p>But those staggering prices for basic sustenance doesn&#8217;t look quite so scary when you consider what they thought the average American would be paid.</p>
<p>A secretary of the year 2010? $95,000. A factory worker? $95 an hour.</p>
<div id="attachment_9253" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-9253" title="1982 omni future salary" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2013/05/1982-omni-future-salary.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="239" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Salaries of the future from the 1982 book Omni Future Almanac</p></div>
<p>Of course, wages for secretaries, factory workers and public high school teachers haven&#8217;t even <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2012/0709/The-incredible-shrinking-pay-raise-Wages-can-t-keep-up-with-inflation">kept pace with inflation</a>. But at least a subway ride isn&#8217;t yet $20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2013/05/18-for-a-dozen-eggs-by-2010-inflation-fears-in-1982/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3D-TV, Automated Cooking and Robot Housemaids: Walter Cronkite Tours the Home of 2001</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2013/01/3d-tv-automated-cooking-and-robot-housemaids-walter-cronkite-tours-the-home-of-2001/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2013/01/3d-tv-automated-cooking-and-robot-housemaids-walter-cronkite-tours-the-home-of-2001/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 18:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Novak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videophone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1960s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=7264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1967, the most trusted man in America investigated the home of the 21st century]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7284" title="cronkite 470x251" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2013/01/cronkite-470x251.jpg" alt="" width="0" height="0" /></p>
<div id="attachment_7266" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-7266" title="cronkite office sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2013/01/cronkite-office-sm.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="418" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Walter Cronkite gives a tour of the home office of 2001 on his show The 21st Century (1967)</p></div>
<p>Legendary news anchor Walter Cronkite&#8217;s regular half-hour CBS documentary program &#8220;The 21st Century&#8221; was a glorious peek into the future. Every Sunday night viewers of the late 1960s were shown all the exciting technological advancements they could expect to see just 30 or 40 years down the road. The <a href="http://www.avgeeks.com/wp2/at-home-20011968/">March 12, 1967</a>, episode gave people a look at the home of the 21st century, complete with 3D television, molded on-demand serving dishes, videophones, inflatable furniture, satellite newspaper delivery and robot servants.</p>
<div id="attachment_7271" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-7271" title="cronkite home exterior" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2013/01/cronkite-home-exterior.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="320" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Exterior of the house of the future (1967)</p></div>
<p>Cronkite spends the first five minutes of the program deriding the evils of urban sprawl and insisting that everyone dreams of a house in seclusion on a few acres of land. Cronkite and his interviewee <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Johnson">Philip Johnson</a> insist that moving back into ever denser cities is the wave of the future. It&#8217;s interesting then that Cronkite must pivot before showing us the standalone home of tomorrow. This would be a second home, Cronkite tells us &#8212; far removed from the high density reality that everyone of the 21st century must face:</p>
<blockquote><p>Let&#8217;s push our imaginations ahead and visit the home of the 21st century. This could be someone&#8217;s second home, hundreds of miles away from the nearest city. It consists of a cluster of pre-fabricated modules. This home is as self-sufficient as a space capsule. It recirculates its own water supply and draws all of its electricity from its own fuel cell.</p></blockquote>
<div id="attachment_7285" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-7285" title="cronkite living room" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2013/01/cronkite-living-room.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="416" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Walter Cronkite in the living room of the future (1967)</p></div>
<p><strong>Living Room of 2001</strong></p>
<p>The living room of the future is a place of push-button luxury and a mid-century modern aesthetic. The sunken living room may feature inflatable furniture and disposable paper kids&#8217; chairs, but Cronkite assures us that there&#8217;s no reason the family of the future couldn&#8217;t have a rocking chair &#8212; to remind us that &#8220;both the present and the future are merely extensions of the past.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>Once inside we might find ourselves in a glass enclosure where the lint and dirt we&#8217;ve accumulated during our trip is removed electrostatically. Now we step into the living room. What will the home of the 21st century look like inside? Well, I&#8217;m sitting in the living room of a mock-up of the home of the future, conceived by Philco-Ford and designed by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_McCobb">Paul McCobb</a>. This is where the family of the 21st century would entertain guests. This room has just about everything one would want: a big (some might say too big) full color 3D television screen, a stereo sound system that could fill the room with music, and comfortable furniture for relaxed conversation.</p></blockquote>
<p>If that living room looks familiar it may be because it&#8217;s the same house from the Internet-famous short film &#8220;<a href="http://www.paleofuture.com/blog/2007/4/29/1999-ad-1967.html">1999 A.D.</a>&#8221; produced in 1967 (often mistakenly dated as 1969, which would make the moon landing stuff less impressive) and starring a young <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wink_Martindale">Wink Martindale</a>.</p>
<div id="attachment_7286" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-7286" title="cronkite 3d tv" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2013/01/cronkite-3d-tv.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="415" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Walter Cronkite showing off the control panel for the 3D-TV of the year 2001 (1967)</p></div>
<p>Cronkite explains that a recent government report concludes that Americans of the year 2000 will have a 30-hour work week and month-long vacations &#8220;as the rule.&#8221; He goes on to tell viewers that this will mean much more leisure time for the average person:</p>
<blockquote><p>A lot of this new free time will be spent at home. And this console controls a full array of equipment to inform, instruct and entertain the family of the future. The possibilities for the evening&#8217;s program are called up on this screen. We could watch a football game, or a movie shown in full color on our big 3D television screen. The sound would come from these globe-like speakers. Or with the push of a button we could momentarily escape from our 21st century lives and fill the room with stereophonic music from another age.</p></blockquote>
<p><iframe width="600" height="450" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ituFqnI0ANo?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><strong>Home Office of 2001</strong></p>
<p>Later, Cronkite takes us into the home office of the future. Here the newspaper is said to be delivered by satellite, and printed off on a gigantic broadsheet printer so that the reader of the future can have a deadtree copy.</p>
<div id="attachment_7304" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-7304" title="cronkite newspaper print" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2013/01/cronkite-newspaper-print.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="415" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Walter Cronkite shows how the newspaper of the future will be delivered via satellite and printed (1967)</p></div>
<blockquote><p>This equipment here will allow [the businessman of the future] to carry on normal business activities without ever going to an office away from home.</p>
<p>This console provides a summary of news relayed by satellite from all over the world. Now to get a newspaper copy for permanent reference I just turn this button, and out it comes. When I&#8217;ve finished catching up on the news I might check the latest weather. This same screen can give me the latest report on the stocks I might own. The telephone is this instrument here &#8212; a mock-up of a possible future telephone, this would be the mouthpiece. Now if I want to see the people I&#8217;m talking with I just turn the button and there they are. Over here as I work on this screen I can keep in touch with other rooms of the house through a closed-circuit television system.</p>
<p>With equipment like this in the home of the future we may not have to go to work, the work would come to us. In the 21st century it may be that no home will be complete without a computerized communications console.</p></blockquote>
<p><iframe width="600" height="450" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/V6DSu3IfRlo?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>One of the more interesting gadgets in the office of the future that we can clearly see but Cronkite never addresses is the &#8220;<a href="http://www.paleofuture.com/blog/2007/5/8/online-shopping-1967.html">electronic correspondence machine</a>&#8221; of the future, otherwise known as the &#8220;home post office.&#8221; In the film &#8220;1999 A.D.&#8221; we see Wink Martindale&#8217;s character manipulating a pen on the machine, which allows for &#8220;instant written communication between individuals anywhere in the world.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Kitchen of 2001</strong></p>
<div id="attachment_7302" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-7302" title="cronkite kitchen" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2013/01/cronkite-kitchen.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="416" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Walter Cronkite in Philco-Ford kitchen of the future (1967)</p></div>
<p>The kitchen of the future includes plastic plates which are molded on-demand, a technology that up until just a few years ago must have seemed rather absurd. With the slow yet steady rise of home <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_printing">3D printers</a> this idea isn&#8217;t completely ridiculous, though we still have quite a ways to go.</p>
<p>After dinner, the plates are melted down, along with any leftover food and re-formed for the next meal. It&#8217;s never explained why the molding and re-molding of plates would be any easier or more efficient than simply allowing the machine to just wash the dishes. But I suppose a simple dishwasher wouldn&#8217;t have seemed terribly futuristic to the people of 1967.</p>
<blockquote><p>This might be the kitchen in the home of the future. Preparation of a meal in the 21st century could be almost fully automatic. Frozen or irradiated foods are stored in that area over there.</p>
<p>Meals in this kitchen of the future are programmed. The menu is given to the automatic chef via typewriter or punched computer cards. The proper prepackaged ingredients are conveyed from the storage area and moved into this microwave oven where they are cooked in seconds. When the meal is done the food comes out here. When the meal is ready, instead of reaching for a stack of plates I just punch a button and the right amount of cups and saucers are molded on the spot.</p>
<p>When I&#8217;ve finished eating, there will be no dishes to wash. The used plates will be melted down again, the leftovers destroyed in the process and the melted plastic will be ready to be molded into clean plates when I need them next.</p></blockquote>
<p><iframe width="600" height="450" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gZBryYvRfFI?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><strong>Robot Servants of 2001</strong></p>
<p>Later in the program Cronkite takes us to the research laboratory of London&#8217;s Queen Mary College where we see robots in development. Cronkite interviews <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meredith_Thring">Professor M. W. Thring</a> about the future of household robotics.</p>
<div id="attachment_7291" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-7291" title="cronkite robots" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2013/01/cronkite-robots.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="335" /><p class="wp-caption-text">M. W. Thring (left) and Walter Cronkite watch two robots in action (1967)</p></div>
<p>Cronkite assures us that the robots are not coming to take over the world, but instead to simply make us breakfast:</p>
<blockquote><p>Robots are coming. Not to rule the world, but to help around the house. In the home of 2001 machines like these may help cook your breakfast and serve it too. We may wake up each morning to the patter of little feet &#8212; robot feet.</p></blockquote>
<div id="attachment_7292" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-7292" title="cronkite robot juice" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2013/01/cronkite-robot-juice.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="416" /><p class="wp-caption-text">A robot arm holds a juice glass in the March 12, 1967 episode of the CBS program &#8220;The 21st Century&#8221;</p></div>
<p>During the interview, the professor addresses one of the most important questions of the futuristic household robot: will it look like a human?</p>
<blockquote><p>CRONKITE: Professor Thring, what are these?</p>
<p>THRING: These are the first prototypes of small scale models of the domestic housemaid of the future.</p>
<p>CRONKITE: The domestic housemaid of the future?</p>
<p>THRING: Yes, the maid of all work. To do all the routine work of the house, all the uninteresting jobs that the housewife would prefer not to do. You also give it instructions about decisions &#8212; it mustn&#8217;t run over the baby and things like that. And then it remembers those instructions and whenever you tell it to do that particular program it does that program.</p>
<p>CRONKITE: What is the completed machine going to look like? Is it going to look like a human being?</p>
<p>THRING: No. There&#8217;s no reason at all why it should look like a human being. The only thing is it&#8217;s got to live in a human house and live in a human house. It&#8217;s got to go through doors and climb up stairs and so on. But there&#8217;s no other reason why it should look like a human being. For example, it can have three or four hands if it wants to, it can have eyes in its feet, it can be entirely different.</p></blockquote>
<p>Thring explains that the robot would put itself away in the cupboard where it would also recharge itself whenever it needed to do so &#8212; not unlike a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roomba">Roomba</a> today, or the <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/09/recapping-the-the-jetsons-episode-01-rosey-the-robot/">automatic push-button vacuum cleaners</a> of &#8220;The Jetsons,&#8221; which first aired just five years earlier.</p>
<p>I first saw this program many years ago while visiting the Paley Center for Media in New York. I asked Skip over at <a href="http://www.avgeeks.com/">AV Geeks</a> if he had a copy and it just so happens he did. He digitized it and released it as a DVD that&#8217;s now available for purchase, called <a href="http://www.avgeeks.com/wp2/future-is-not-as-good-as-it-used-to-be-dvd/">Future Is Not As Good As It Used To Be</a>. Many thanks to Skip for digging out this retro-futuristic gem. And if anyone from CBS is reading this, please release &#8220;The 21st Century&#8221; online or with a DVD box set. Cronkite&#8217;s show is one of the greatest forward-looking artifacts of the 20th century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2013/01/3d-tv-automated-cooking-and-robot-housemaids-walter-cronkite-tours-the-home-of-2001/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Garrison Keillor&#8217;s 1996 Predictions for the Future of Media</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2013/01/garrison-keillors-1996-predictions-for-the-future-of-media/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2013/01/garrison-keillors-1996-predictions-for-the-future-of-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Novak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dystopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=6992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A woebegone tribute to the ending of an era]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7047" title="1996 amy crehore 470x251" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2013/01/1996-amy-crehore-470x251.jpg" alt="" width="0" height="0" /></p>
<div id="attachment_7029" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 249px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-7029" title="NostalgiaManNYTKeillor_AmyCrehore sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2013/01/NostalgiaManNYTKeillor_AmyCrehore-sm-249x300.jpeg" alt="" width="249" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">&#8220;Nostalgia Man&#8221; by Amy Crehore 1996, oil painting (9 1/2&#8243; x 10 1/2&#8243;) <a href="http://www.amycrehore.com" target="_blank">www.amycrehore.com</a></p></div>
<p>There are many different ways to talk about the future, but few are more self-centered than guessing how the generations of tomorrow may judge you and yours.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garrison_Keillor">Garrison Keillor</a> did just that with his article, &#8220;The Future of Nostalgia,&#8221; which appeared in the September 29, 1996, issue of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times_Magazine"><em>The New York Times Magazine</em></a>.</p>
<p>Some of Keillor&#8217;s observations ring true for those of us here in the year 2013: he predicts that the future of air travel will only become more and more cumbersome and he imagines that Americans&#8217; growing dissatisfaction with stagnant wages may become an issue. But the vast majority of the piece reads as cranky &#8220;get off my lawn&#8221; nostalgia. Which is to say, he&#8217;s romanticizing a past that never existed in the service of bemoaning a future that will never arrive. He begins by calling contemporary culture &#8220;trash&#8221; (being careful to clarify that the <em>New York Times</em> doesn&#8217;t qualify as such) and pretty much goes downhill on the future of humanity from there.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s his vision of the media landscape of the future that&#8217;s most interesting to me. Maybe because in many ways he didn&#8217;t go far enough (only 1,000 movies available on the Internet?) and bizarrely longs for some antiquated version of celebrity that he implies is somehow more pure. But his dominant fear &#8212; that the way we consume media would be rapidly changing into the 21st century &#8212; was one prophecy fully realized. It&#8217;s just up to those of us living in &#8220;the future&#8221; to decide whether any of those changes are a good thing.</p>
<p>Even just holding this 1996 issue of <em>The New York Times Magazine</em> in my hand makes me acutely aware of how much has changed in the world of publishing since then. The magazine is thick at 216 pages and bursting at the seams with slick colorful ads &#8212; a sign of healthy profits for any media outlet in the mid-90s. But as more and more eyeballs (and ad dollars) have shifted to the digital realm, it&#8217;s hard to judge a mag by its deadtree count.</p>
<p>Keillor writes about the death of the newspaper and frustrations with getting Internet images to load:</p>
<blockquote><p>People are going to miss it a lot &#8212; they&#8217;ll think: What a wonderful thing a newspaper was! You opened it and there it was, you didn&#8217;t have to wait three minutes for the art to download, and when your wife said, &#8220;Give me a section,&#8221; you did.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, few Americans in the year 2013 are waiting three minutes for an image to load online but I personally identify with those who would stubbornly cling to something like the deadtree Sunday <em>Times; </em>something most easily enjoyed (and more importantly shared) over a cup of coffee with some pulp and ink on your fingers. You have no idea how much it pains me to identify with Mr. Guy Noir himself in this case.</p>
<p>Later in the piece Keillor romanticizes the celebrity of the past &#8212; the &#8220;real&#8221; ones &#8212; like Frank Sinatra. He worries that in the future we won&#8217;t have any common language with which to talk around the water cooler or the dinner table. And Keillor shudders to think about the overwhelming amount of media (10,000 CDs on the Internet, oh my!) future generations will have at their disposal:</p>
<blockquote><p>People will feel nostalgia for celebrities, real ones, like there used to be back when there were three TV networks and Americans watched the same shows at the same time and talked about them the next day at work. Television was common currency. Sunday afternoons you watched the NFL game with your dad on the couch and then you went to the table and ate pot roast and mashed potatoes. Everybody else did the same thing.</p>
<p>Every American knew Sinatra by sight and by voice, but when you scattered the audience among 200 cable-TV channels and 1,000 movies you could watch on the Internet and 10,000 CDs you could download, there weren&#8217;t many true celebrities anymore. People will miss them. There will be new celebrities, thousands of them, but not many people will know who they are.</p></blockquote>
<p>Like I mentioned, I share some of Keillor&#8217;s strange nostalgic notions about deadtrees and sharing a newspaper over breakfast. But what&#8217;s most interesting to me is not so much his premature nostalgia for 1996 but his rather stereotypical nostalgia for the 1950s. For a man whose art has focused almost exclusively on the idyllic past that never was, I suppose this makes perfect sense.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>NYTimes.com doesn&#8217;t seem to have the article digitized but you can read the piece in its entirety at <em><a href="http://www.deseretnews.com/article/542297/THE-FUTURE-OF-NOSTALGIA.html?pg=all">Deseret News</a></em>. <a href="www.amycrehore.com">Amy Crehore</a>&#8216;s 1996 oil painting &#8220;Nostalgia Man&#8221; appeared alongside Keillor&#8217;s original article and is republished here with permission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2013/01/garrison-keillors-1996-predictions-for-the-future-of-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aldous Huxley&#8217;s Predictions for 2000 A.D.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/11/aldous-huxleys-predictions-for-2000-a-d/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/11/aldous-huxleys-predictions-for-2000-a-d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Novak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1950s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=5385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The famous author envisioned a brave new world where swelling populations would put tremendous strain on the Earth's resources]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5470" title="you in 2000 470x251" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/you-in-2000-470x251.jpg" alt="" width="0" height="0" />There seems to be two occasions when people most enjoy making predictions: anniversaries (think the <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/02/1970s-children-draw-robot-presidents-and-nuclear-apocalypse/">American Bicentennial</a>, New Year&#8217;s, etc) and dates that include round numbers (any year ending in zero). Such was the case in 1950 when many people halfway through the 20th century enjoyed predicting what life would be like in the year 2000 &#8212; obviously the roundest numbered year of our modern age.</p>
<div title="Page 1">
<div title="Page 1">
<p>The January 1950 issue of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redbook"><em>Redbook</em></a> magazine asked, &#8220;What will the world of 2000 A.D. be like? Will the machine replace man? How will our children and grandchildren spend their leisure? How, indeed, will they look?&#8221; The mag asked four experts &#8212; curiously all men, given that <em>Redbook</em> was and is a magazine aimed at women &#8212; about what the world may look like fifty years hence.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldous_Huxley">Aldous Huxley</a>, author of the 1931 dystopian novel <em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brave_New_World">Brave New World</a>, </em>looked at working life in the year 2000. Specifically, how people might work in the home, in the laboratory, in the office, in the factory and on the farm.</p>
</div>
<div id="attachment_5391" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-5391" title="1950 Jan Redbook george englert sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/1950-Jan-Redbook-george-englert-sm.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="198" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The farmer of the year 2000 directs his &#8220;robot machines&#8221; (illustrated by George Englert)</p></div>
<p>Aldous Huxley began his article by describing the major challenges that would confront the world at the dawn of the 21st century. He predicted that the global population would swell to 3 billion people &#8212; a figure less than half of the 6.1 billion that would prove to be a reality by 2000.</p>
<blockquote><p>During the next fifty years mankind will face three great problems: the problem of avoiding war; the problem of feeding and clothing a population of two and a quarter billions which, by 2000 A.D., will have grown to upward of three billions, and the problem of supplying these billions without ruining the planet&#8217;s irreplaceable resources.</p>
<p>Let us assume—and unhappily it is a large assumption—that the nations can agree to live in peace. In this event mankind will be free to devote all its energy and skill to the solution of its other major problems.</p></blockquote>
<div id="attachment_5462" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 215px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-5462" title="1950 Jan Redbook cover sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/1950-Jan-Redbook-cover-sm-215x300.jpeg" alt="" width="215" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Cover of the Jan 1950 issue of Redbook</p></div>
<p>Huxley&#8217;s predictions for food production in the year 2000 are largely a call for the conservation of resources. He correctly points out that meat production can be far less efficient than using agricultural lands for crops. Moreover, he discusses the growing importance of synthetic materials (a reality we take for granted in so many ways today). His description of synthetics was incredibly prescient, if not very surprising, coming from a man whose most famous novel imagined a high-tech world built on mass production.</p>
<blockquote><p>By 2000, let us hope, the peoples of the world will have adopted a program to increase the planet&#8217;s output of food and other necessities, while conserving its resources. Because all available land will be needed for food production, concerted efforts will be made to derive all the fibers used for textiles from inorganic materials or vegetable wastes. Food crops will be cultivated on the land now devoted to cotton, flax, hemp and jute, and, since wool will no longer be used, the huge flocks of sheep which now menace Australian and North American watersheds will be greatly diminished. Because of the need to give overworked soil a rest and to extract the greatest possible number of calories from every acre under cultivation, meat production, which is fantastically wasteful of land, will be cut down, and increasing attention will be given to the products, vegetable no less than animal, of the ocean. Landlocked inlets, lakes, ponds and swamps will be scientifically farmed.</p>
<p>In many parts of the world forests are being recklessly destroyed. To conserve them we shall have to develop new types of synthetic building materials and new sources for paper. That the production of a comic supplement should entail the death of thousands of magnificent trees is a scandal which cannot much longer be tolerated.</p>
<p>How will individuals be affected by all this? For many farmers the changes will mean a shift from one kind of production to another. For many others they will entail a transfer to the chemical industry. For the chemical industry is bound to grow more important as world erosion compels us, for the sake of the land, to rely increasingly on synthetics derived from practically inexhaustible inorganic materials.</p></blockquote>
<div title="Page 1">
<div id="attachment_5390" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-5390" title="1950 Jan Redbook housewife sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/1950-Jan-Redbook-housewife-sm.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="189" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The housewife of 2000 receives cooking instruction by TV (illustrated by George Englert)</p></div>
<div title="Page 1">
<p>The world of 2000 A.D. was seen by many to be one of increased leisure. But Huxley sees that potential for better working conditions and increased standards of living as obtainable only through a sustained peace.  These same predictions of a leisure-oriented society, by Huxley and others living mid-century, would inspire the push-button cliche later parodied in the 1962 TV show &#8220;<a href="http://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/The-Jetsons-at-50.html">The Jetsons</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps Huxley&#8217;s most inaccurate prediction is his assumption that an increase in productivity will mean an increase in wages for the average worker. As we&#8217;ve seen over the last half a century, increased worker productivity has <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/03/this-is-what-the-productivity-crisis-looks-like/72813/">not led to a dramatic increase in wages</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>That enormous technological advances will be recorded during the next fifty years is certain. But to the worker as a worker, such advances will not necessarily be of great significance. It makes very little difference to the textile worker whether the stuff he handles is the product of a worm, a plant, a mammal or a chemical laboratory. Work is work, and what matters to the worker is neither the product nor the technical process, but the pay, the hours, the attitude of the boss, the physical environment. To most office and factory workers in 2000 the application of nuclear fission to industry will mean very little. What they will care about is what their fathers and mothers care about today—improvement in the conditions of labor. Given peace, it should be possible, within the next fifty years, to improve working conditions very considerably. Better equipped, workers will produce more and therefore earn more. Meanwhile most of the hideous relics of the industrial Middle Ages will have been replaced by new factories, offices and homes. More and more factories and offices will be relocated in small country communities, where life is cheaper, pleasanter and more genuinely human than in those breeding-grounds of mass neurosis, the great metropolitan centers of today. Decentralization may help to check that march toward the asylum, which is a threat to our civilization hardly less grave than that of erosion and A-bomb.</p></blockquote>
<p>Huxley rightly predicts that the world would have to face the challenges that go along with having an aging population. Huxley himself would only live to see the year 1963, but he acknowledged what life would be like for young people reading his article.</p>
<div title="Page 1">
<blockquote><p>If the finished product means little to the worker, it means much to the housewife. New synthetic building materials will be easier to keep clean. New solar heating systems will be cheaper and less messy. Electronics in the kitchen will greatly simplify the task of the cook. In a word, by 2000 the business of living should have become decidedly less arduous than it is at present. But, though less arduous, it will last on the average a good deal longer. In 2000 there will be more elderly people in the world than at any previous time. In many countries the citizens of sixty-five and over will outnumber the boys and girls of fifteen and under. Pensions and a pointless leisure offer no solution to the problems of an aging population. In 2000 the younger readers of this article, who will then be in their seventies, will probably be inhabiting a world in which the old are provided with opportunities for using their experience and remaining strength in ways satisfactory to themselves, and valuable to the community.</p></blockquote>
<div id="attachment_5388" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-5388" title="1950 Jan Redbook technology science sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/1950-Jan-Redbook-technology-science-sm.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="201" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The worker of the 2000 will work just 20 hours per week according to Redbook (illustrated by George Englert)</p></div>
<p>All in all, I&#8217;d say that Huxley&#8217;s predictions were fairly accurate in spirit. Like so many prominent people of mid-century, he fails to predict or consider the dramatic social changes that would occur which had a direct impact on the 21st century workforce. But his idea that &#8220;work is work&#8221; and people simply want to find the best work they can with the best conditions and pay seems to be a timeless observation.</p>
<p>What do you say? I&#8217;m by no means an expert on Huxley and would welcome the opinion of others who may be able to read between the lines and offer insight into his vision of the year 2000.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/11/aldous-huxleys-predictions-for-2000-a-d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recapping &#8216;The Jetsons&#8217;: Episode 06 &#8211; The Good Little Scouts</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/10/recapping-the-jetsons-episode-06-the-good-little-scouts/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/10/recapping-the-jetsons-episode-06-the-good-little-scouts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Novak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jetsons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Colonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tourism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1960s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=5403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A camping trip to the moon might seem fanciful, but 1960s advertisers were already promoting space tourism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5433" title="george moon 470x251" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/george-moon-470x251.jpg" alt="" width="0" height="0" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5303" title="jetsons nite out 470x251" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/jetsons-nite-out-470x251.jpg" alt="" width="0" height="0" /><a href="http://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/The-Jetsons-at-50.html"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5172" title="jetsons_600x160" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/jetsons_600x160.png" alt="" width="600" height="160" /></a><em>This is the sixth in a <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/09/50-years-of-the-jetsons-why-the-show-still-matters/">24-part series</a> looking at every episode of “The Jetsons” TV show from the original 1962-63 season.</em><br />
<object id="embed" width="410" height="316" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" align="middle"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="flashVars" value="mediaKey=ca679456-f74e-4193-9dc7-d193eace8dec&amp;config=wbembedplayer.xml" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="src" value="http://www.thewb.com/player/wbphasethree/wbvideoplayer.swf" /><param name="flashvars" value="mediaKey=ca679456-f74e-4193-9dc7-d193eace8dec&amp;config=wbembedplayer.xml" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="embed" width="410" height="316" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.thewb.com/player/wbphasethree/wbvideoplayer.swf" allowScriptAccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" flashVars="mediaKey=ca679456-f74e-4193-9dc7-d193eace8dec&amp;config=wbembedplayer.xml" quality="high" flashvars="mediaKey=ca679456-f74e-4193-9dc7-d193eace8dec&amp;config=wbembedplayer.xml" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" align="middle" /></object></p>
<p>As a child, did you ever think that one day you might be able to vacation on the moon? You weren&#8217;t alone. A permanent settlement on the moon wasn&#8217;t some crackpot scheme only touted by fringe elements in the mad science community. Scientists, politicians, clergymen and journalists were all promising that once humans inevitably set foot on the moon, permanent settlements (and vacation resorts!) were sure to follow.</p>
<p>The sixth episode of &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; revolved around this assumption that the moon would soon be the perfect destination for a Boy Scout-like camping trip. Titled &#8220;Good Little Scouts,&#8221; the episode originally aired on October 29, 1962 and was probably a pleasant distraction for U.S. viewers from the previous week&#8217;s headlines which were all about the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_missile_crisis">Cuban missile crisis</a>. We follow Elroy&#8217;s Space Cub troop and their new scout leader, George Jetson, to the moon. The only problem for George? His boss&#8217;s son Arthur is along for the ride and—when he goes off wandering the moon by himself—he causes George to get lost and look like a fool.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not stated explicitly, but the sixth episode might provide the first look at a building on the earth&#8217;s surface &#8212; Grand Central Space-tion. Grand Central clearly takes its architectural cues from the <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/06/googie-architecture-of-the-space-age/">Googie</a> style &#8212; more specifically New York&#8217;s JFK airport <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TWA_Flight_Center">TWA terminal</a>, which was opened in 1962 (the same year as the Jetsons premiere) and designed by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eero_Saarinen">Eero Saarinen</a>.</p>
<div id="attachment_5424" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-5424" title="grand central sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/grand-central-sm.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="421" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Grand Central Space-tion, from the sixth episode of The Jetsons TV show</p></div>
<p>In this episode we learn that the moon is a bit like Yellowstone National Park &#8212; it has a hotel and some accommodations, but it&#8217;s largely unexplored and makes for a great camping trip. The moon has a Moonhattan Tilton Hotel, a play on the name Manhattan Hilton Hotel.</p>
<div id="attachment_5405" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-5405" title="moonhattan sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/moonhattan-sm.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="420" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Screenshot of the Moonhattan Tilton Hotel, a parody of the Manhattan Hilton Hotel</p></div>
<p>Fans of the AMC TV show &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mad_Men">Mad Men</a>&#8221; may recall a storyline wherein Conrad Hilton, the head of the Hilton hotel chain, wants an advertising campaign that includes a Hilton on the moon. This story arc wasn&#8217;t entirely fictional. The Hilton company (most especially Barron Hilton, one of Conrad&#8217;s sons) was known for their various promotions in the late 1950s and throughout the 1960s that promised they would be the first hotel on the moon. They even had futuristic moon hotel keys made, which you can see over at <a href="http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20120712-where-is-hiltons-lunar-hotel">BBC Future</a>, where I&#8217;ve written about various visions the people at Hilton had for hotels on the moon.</p>
<div id="attachment_5414" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-5414" title="1958-June-1-moon-honeymoon-crop-sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/1958-June-1-moon-honeymoon-crop-sm.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="387" /><p class="wp-caption-text">June 1, 1958 edition of the Sunday comic strip Closer Than We Think featuring honeymooners on the moon</p></div>
<p>Just as &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; was inspired by futuristic ideas of the day and turned them even more fantastical, so too did <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2011/11/arthur-radebaughs-shiny-happy-future/">Arthur Radebaugh</a>&#8216;s &#8220;Closer Than We Think&#8221; sift through the news stories of the late 1950s and early 1960s looking for predictions that could be heightened through fanciful illustration. As we looked at in February, the techno-utopians of the late 1950s were convinced that the Space Age would bring about a wondrous future of <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/02/honeymoon-on-the-moon/">moon tourism</a>. The June 1, 1958 edition of &#8220;Closer Than We Think&#8221; showed two couples dancing the night away in low gravity as they honeymoon on the moon; the earth sparkling in the distance.</p>
<blockquote><p>Scenic spots on the moon, in years ahead, may become honeymoon havens, like Niagara Falls today. Newly wedded couples will be able to fly to a low-cost lunar holiday in a space craft propelled by thermo-nuclear energy. Space expert Wernher von Braun foresees pressurized, air-conditioned excursion hotels and small cottages on the moon. Couples could dance gaily there, whirling high in the air due to reduced gravity pull, and look out on a strange, spectacular scenery — part of which would be a spaceman’s view of the familiar outlines of the continents of the earth.</p></blockquote>
<p>And it wasn&#8217;t just comic strip illustrators who saw humans living on the moon as a certainty. Insurance companies, banks and other financial institutions aren&#8217;t usually known for their exaggerated science fiction claims in advertising, but the early 1960s saw just that with a newspaper advertisement from 1962 for Michigan Mutual Liability. The ad imagined that by the year 2012 we&#8217;d be <a href="http://www.paleofuture.com/blog/2011/4/7/picnics-on-mars-in-the-year-2012-1962.html">picnicking on Mars</a> and have suburban-style homes on the moon.</p>
<div id="attachment_5434" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-5434" title="geoge space cubs" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/geoge-space-cubs.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="423" /><p class="wp-caption-text">George with Elroy&#8217;s Space Cubs troop where they&#8217;ve become lost on the moon</p></div>
<p>This Jetsons episode is a perfect example of the Jetson formula that uses absurdist cartoon logic (complete with green, two-head Martians on the moon) but still manages to plant the seed of a wondrous future for 21st century humans in space. Recognizing how many kids were watching this episode on repeat throughout the 1960s, &#8217;70s and &#8217;80s, it&#8217;s easy to see why so many people continue to ask, where&#8217;s my <a href="http://www.economist.com/node/21557719">vacation on the moon</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/10/recapping-the-jetsons-episode-06-the-good-little-scouts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A New Great Depression and Ladies on the Moon: 1970s Middle School Kids Look to the Year 2000</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/10/a-new-great-depression-and-ladies-on-the-moon-1970s-middle-school-kids-look-to-the-year-2000/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/10/a-new-great-depression-and-ladies-on-the-moon-1970s-middle-school-kids-look-to-the-year-2000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Novak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternative Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flying Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health and Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Colonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1970s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=5040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ideal future according to a ten-year-old:  shorter school days, lower taxes, and lots and lots of robots]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5068" title="1977 space colony 470x251" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/1977-space-colony-470x251.jpg" alt="" width="0" height="0" /></p>
<div id="attachment_5046" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-5046" title="sport in space colony 1977 sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/sport-in-space-colony-1977-sm.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="376" /><p class="wp-caption-text">People in a space colony of the future (by Rick Guidice, 1977)</p></div>
<p>The February 26, 1977 edition of the <em>Herald-Star</em> in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steubenville,_Ohio">Steubenville, Ohio</a> published dozens of predictions for the year 2000 made by the people of Steubenville, a working class town in eastern Ohio (and the birthplace of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_Martin">Dean Martin</a>). Some of these letters came from local middle school kids 10-12 years old and they provide a fascinating snapshot of the era; unique in their ability to reflect the pessimism stirred by a down economy and shaken faith in government in a post-Watergate, post-Vietnam War era, while also laying bare the irrational optimism of youth.</p>
<p>Many of the predictions are clearly influenced by the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1970s_energy_crisis">energy crisis</a>, with many kids predicting there will be tough times ahead without access to cheap energy. However, there&#8217;s also optimism about space exploration and more than one reference to women as astronauts. Even though <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valentina_Tereshkova">Valentina Tereshkova</a> became the first woman in space in 1963, the first American woman (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Ride">Sally Ride</a>, who died this past summer) wouldn&#8217;t become an astronaut until 1983 &#8212; a full six years after these kids were making their predictions.</p>
<p>Interestingly, for being middle schoolers these kids sure seem concerned about high taxes. All of these kids are now between 45 and 48 years old and if you happen to be one of them, I&#8217;d love to hear from you. How do you feel reading your predictions from the vantage point of &#8220;the future&#8221;? How do you feel about the years to come?</p>
<p>Some of the letters from the February 26, 1977 <em>Herald-Star</em> appear below:</p>
<p><strong>New Great Depression</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>I think that by the year 2000 we will be in a great depression. People are saying that we are running out of fuel. People will be using machines to do everything. And machines run on fuel. If we run out of fuel we won&#8217;t be able to run the machines and people will be out of jobs. So we can save fuel. Everybody should try to save by turning their heat to 68 degrees.</p>
<p>Debbie Six, 12 (Harding School)</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>We&#8217;ll Find More Oil</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>My view of the future is that we will find more gas and oil. No one will be poor and we all will live in peace! Also in the future, I think they will find some mechanical device that could make kitchens, dining rooms and etc. You&#8217;d just push a button and WHAM!! An instant living room or WHAM!! an instant milkshake. And that&#8217;s my view of the future!</p>
<p>Emma Conforti, Age 11 (Harding School)</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Robot Maids, Robot Teachers</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>In the year 2000, we will have all round buildings. We will have a robot teacher, a robot maid, and all workers will be robots, too. We will have a pocket computer that has everything you can name. We will even be able to push a button to get anything you want!</p>
<p>Marty Bohen, Age 10 (Harding School)</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Electric Cars and Ladies on the Moon</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>The year 2000 might have everybody walking instead of riding in their cars because there might be a gas shortage by then, and the cars give out a lot of pollution. Or there might even be electric cars instead of gas cars. The year 2000 may send ladies to the moon to explore and look and see if there are people living on the moon. And when you work you will push buttons and robots will come out and do the work for you. And there will be lower prices and taxes, I hope.</p>
<p>Tim Villies, 10 (Harding School)</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Cures For Every Sickness</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>In 2000 I will marry a doctor and maybe have kids. I would like my husband to be a doctor because he would be helping people and would still want to be close to my family. As for a job for me I would help the crippled boys and girls. I would still like to have my same friends. And the most important thing for there to be is no wars and killings. I hope they could find cures for every sickness. And everybody will care for each other.</p>
<p>Monica Katsaros, Age 10 (Harding School)</p></blockquote>
<p><strong> The Last Five Years Haven&#8217;t Been So Good</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>I think 2000 will be a good year. I hope so because the last five years haven&#8217;t been so good with people dying and getting shot and murdered. I will be a grown man by then and will be married. I&#8217;ll probably have kids. I hope it will be a good America.</p>
<p>Michael Beal, Age 10 (Harding School)</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Women Astronauts</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>In the year 2000, I think there won&#8217;t be any crimes of any kind. Shorter school days and lower taxes. I hope there will be lower taxes and no crimes because I&#8217;ll be 33 years old and I am sick of crimes and high taxes. I hope woman can be astronauts. I also hope there won&#8217;t be any pollution. And I also hope there will be town in space, where people live in space capsules.</p>
<p>Lora Ziarko, Age 10 (Harding School)</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Cars That Float On Air</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>I think the future will be better than it is now. The pollution problem will be solved and there will be cars that float on air. I will be 34 in the year 2000. I will have a good job designing modern houses with push-button controls for everything to make it easier on everyone.</p>
<p>You could push a button and a bed would unfold from the wall. Everything would run on solar energy so you wouldn&#8217;t have to worry about the fuel shortage. You wouldn&#8217;t have to go to school. It would be on TV and living would be much easier for everyone.</p>
<p>John Vecchione, Age 11 (Harding School)</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Young People Unemployed</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>I think by the year 2000 we will be riding bikes or driving solar-energized cars. By then more younger people will be unemployed. The price of gas will go up and so will the price of coal, silver, gold and oil.</p>
<p>Pietro Sincropi, 10 (Harding School)</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Living on Mars</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>I think it is going to be an all-new world. People are going to be able to live on the moon and on Mars. Man is going to have computers to do the work for him. It is going to be a computer run world.</p>
<p>Tracy McCoy, Age 12 (Harding School)</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Most of the World Will Be The United States of America</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>In the year 2000 I will be 34 years old. And actually I don&#8217;t think kids will have to go to school, because I believe that families will have computers to educate students. That&#8217;s all for education. I also believe that most of the world will all be the United States of America. I also believe that business and industry will be up 75 per cent. And as for culture, the Model T will be an old artifact. And, if you have children or grandchildren, they&#8217;ll all be more interested in culture than ever.</p>
<p>Mike Metzger, Age 10 3/4 (Harding School)</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>I Hope By Then Things Will Get Better</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>I think that everything by the year 2000 will be different. I hope the violence will all be stopped. I hope that the computers don&#8217;t take over people&#8217;s jobs. I hope by then things will get better.</p>
<p>Mary Gallo, Age 12 (Harding School)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/10/a-new-great-depression-and-ladies-on-the-moon-1970s-middle-school-kids-look-to-the-year-2000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recapping &#8216;The Jetsons&#8217;: Episode 03 &#8211; The Space Car</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/10/recapping-the-jetsons-episode-03-the-space-car/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/10/recapping-the-jetsons-episode-03-the-space-car/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 19:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Novak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flying Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jetsons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1960s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=4926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Jetsons didn't invent the flying car, but it sure did a lot to cement the idea of the airborne automobile into the American imagination]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4962" title="space car 470x251" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/space-car-470x251.jpg" alt="" width="0" height="0" /></p>
<div id="attachment_4951" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4951" title="space car full" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/space-car-full.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="424" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Screenshot from the third episode of The Jetsons, The Space Car (originally aired October 7, 1962)</p></div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>This is the third in a <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/09/50-years-of-the-jetsons-why-the-show-still-matters/">24-part series</a> looking at every episode of “The Jetsons” TV show from the original 1962-63 season.</em><br />
<object id="embed" width="410" height="316" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" align="middle"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="flashVars" value="mediaKey=b3183eed-fc83-4c15-9347-66c18d1c8163&amp;config=wbembedplayer.xml" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="src" value="http://www.thewb.com/player/wbphasethree/wbvideoplayer.swf" /><param name="flashvars" value="mediaKey=b3183eed-fc83-4c15-9347-66c18d1c8163&amp;config=wbembedplayer.xml" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="embed" width="410" height="316" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.thewb.com/player/wbphasethree/wbvideoplayer.swf" allowScriptAccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" flashVars="mediaKey=b3183eed-fc83-4c15-9347-66c18d1c8163&amp;config=wbembedplayer.xml" quality="high" flashvars="mediaKey=b3183eed-fc83-4c15-9347-66c18d1c8163&amp;config=wbembedplayer.xml" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" align="middle" /></object></p>
<p>Each and every year at least one company goes knocking on the doors of the major news outlets and announces to the world that the futuristic vision of a flying car will be a practical reality within a few short years. Some of these companies appear to be making these promises in earnest, fully recognizing that their flying cars &#8212; should they ever hit the market &#8212; will be wildly expensive and essentially just road-legal airplanes. Other flying car companies are far more sketchy and have gotten into hot water with the FEC over their <a href="http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr17987.htm">questionable fundraising</a> practices.</p>
<p>But any way you look at it, a flying car in every garage is still a long way from becoming a part of the average American&#8217;s reality.</p>
<p><em>The Jetsons</em> didn&#8217;t invent the flying car, but it sure did a lot to cement the idea of the airborne automobile into the American imagination. The third episode of &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; is the show&#8217;s first in-depth look at the cars of the future. Titled &#8220;The Space Car,&#8221; the episode originally aired on Sunday October 7, 1962.</p>
<p>The episode opens with a seemingly sentient computer doing its best to wake George from his slumber. The family all meets for breakfast in the dining room and George does his best to cook a meal by push-button. In true early-TV sitcom fashion George fails miserably at this task. Jane talks to her friend by videophone and then we&#8217;re introduced to two shady-looking characters who will serve to create confusion with their cops and robbers hijinks. George and Jane set out to buy a new car and arrive at Molecular Motors where they and the viewers at home are treated to a car salesman&#8217;s pitch from the year 2062.</p>
<div id="attachment_4966" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4966" title="fold up car jetsons" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/fold-up-car-jetsons.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="422" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The fold-up flying car of the future as imagined in the third episode of The Jetsons</p></div>
<p>Longtime readers of Paleofuture will, of course, be familiar with dozens of flying cars that predate the 1962 arrival of <em>The Jetsons</em> on the small screen. From the fully functional (if impractical) <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/07/1954-flying-car-for-sale/">Aerocar</a> of the early 1950s to Hugo Gernsback&#8217;s 1923 vision of a <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/06/1923-envisions-the-two-wheeled-flying-car-of-1973/">two-wheeled flying car</a>, we&#8217;ve seen hundreds of predictions for the flying car of the future throughout the 20th century. Plenty of flying cars would follow the Jetsons as well, like when two men in California died in 1973 after they tried strapping <a href="http://www.paleofuture.com/blog/2009/7/3/inventors-die-testing-flying-pinto-1973.html">airplane wings on a Pinto</a>.</p>
<p>The car shopping montage in this episode appears to have been inspired by the tone and style of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tex_Avery">Tex Avery</a>&#8216;s late-1940 and early-&#8217;50s &#8220;Of Tomorrow&#8221; cartoons. Avery&#8217;s cartoons looked at the <a href="http://youtu.be/WUArCmcpwuA">TV</a>, house, farm and <a href="http://youtu.be/MG4JRi_hyPQ">car</a> of tomorrow with an irreverent flare. Many of the sight gags from &#8220;The Space Car&#8221; pay homage to this style of dissecting the various goofy caricatures of futuristic thinking, adhering to the comedic (and often sexist) stylings of the time.</p>
<p>In fact, the &#8220;mother-in-law&#8221; joke we see in <em>The Jetsons</em> is identical to that of Tex Avery&#8217;s &#8220;Car of Tomorrow&#8221; cartoon short, right down to the color of the car.</p>
<div id="attachment_4973" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4973" title="mother in law car" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/mother-in-law-car.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="201" /><p class="wp-caption-text">(Left) The Jetsons episode from Oct 7, 1962 (Right) The Tex Avery short cartoon &#8220;Car of Tomorrow&#8221; from 1951</p></div>
<p>The car companies themselves, as much as anyone, were promoting the idea of a radical shift in automobiles in the coming decades. The April 25, 1959 issue of the <em><a href="http://www.paleofuture.com/blog/2007/4/28/in-50-years-cars-flying-like-missiles-chicago-daily-tribune.html">Chicago Daily Tribune</a></em> relayed the beliefs of Ford VPs, who touted the flying car as one of the many innovations still to come:</p>
<blockquote><p>Can you imagine an autoist driving up to a &#8220;gas&#8221; station 50 years from now and receiving replacement energy capsules for his car instead of getting a tank full of liquid fuel?</p>
<p>Also, can you imagine flying automobiles directed by automatic guidance systems?</p>
<p>These were possibilities discussed last week by Dr. Andrew A. Kucher, Ford Motor company vice president in charge of engineering and research, in an address at Northwestern University.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2011/11/arthur-radebaughs-shiny-happy-future/">Arthur Radebaugh</a>&#8216;s syndicated Sunday comic &#8220;Closer Than We Think&#8221; was also a likely inspiration for The Jetsons&#8217; vision of flying cars. The April 6, 1958 edition of the strip imagined cars that would <a href="http://www.paleofuture.com/blog/2011/2/22/flying-carpet-car-1958-1.html">ride on a cushion of air</a>, according to Kucher, who was eager to tout this idea in the press during that time.</p>
<div id="attachment_4983" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4983" title="flying carpet car" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/flying-carpet-car.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="371" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The &#8220;flying carpet car&#8221; from the April 6, 1958 edition of Arthur Radebaugh&#8217;s &#8220;Closer Than We Think&#8221;</p></div>
<blockquote><p>Look, pa, no wheels! Use of a thin layer of compressed air may allow autos to hover and move just above ground level.</p>
<p>A pipe dream? Not at all. The concept (already proved) comes from scientist Andrew Kucher, vice-president of engineering at one of our major motor companies. His people are studying how to maintain stability. Special highway engineering is one way. Another is skillful design, evidenced already in experimental ideas from the staff of motor stylist George W. Walker.</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s earthbound cars won&#8217;t turn into low flying carpets right away. But it may happen sooner than we think!</p></blockquote>
<p>The episode essentially boils down to the &#8220;men can&#8217;t cook, women can&#8217;t drive, mother-in-laws are terrible&#8221; sitcom trope, but the episode serves to further the vision of a technologically advanced society. Unfortunately for <em>The Jetsons</em>, it was on October 7, 1962 that they started to get their bad press. As I mentioned in my first post about the <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/09/50-years-of-the-jetsons-why-the-show-still-matters/">historical significance</a> of <em>The Jetsons</em>, the show struggled as it was up against the tremendously popular &#8220;Walt Disney&#8217;s Wonderful World of Color.&#8221; Filling in for Jay Fredericks of the <em>Gazette Mail</em> in Charleston, West Virgina, writer L.T. Anderson wrote of his love for what Disney had been doing the past few Sundays on NBC, and his distaste for <em>The Jetsons</em> on ABC in that same time slot: &#8220;<em>The Jetsons</em>, a cartoon series about a family of the future, was so bad that my eight-year-old son turned off and said a dirty word.&#8221;</p>
<div id="attachment_4978" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4978" title="molecular motors" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/molecular-motors.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="423" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The car dealership of the future from the third episode of The Jetsons</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/10/recapping-the-jetsons-episode-03-the-space-car/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recapping &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221;: Episode 02 &#8211; A Date With Jet Screamer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/10/recapping-the-jetsons-episode-02-a-date-with-jet-screamer/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/10/recapping-the-jetsons-episode-02-a-date-with-jet-screamer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 20:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Novak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flying Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jetsons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1960s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=4193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Jetson family's descent into sex, drugs and rock &#038; roll]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4752" title="jetsons fun pad 470x251" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/jetsons-fun-pad-470x251.jpg" alt="" width="0" height="0" /></p>
<div id="attachment_4194" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4194" title="jetsons 45 sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/09/jetsons-45-sm.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="607" /><p class="wp-caption-text">45 RPM record of the Jetsons theme song and &#8220;Eep Opp Ork Ah Ah&#8221; from 1962 (misspelled &#8220;OOP&#8221;)</p></div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>This is the second in a <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/09/50-years-of-the-jetsons-why-the-show-still-matters/">24-part series</a> looking at every episode of &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; TV show from the original 1962-63 season. <a title="Recapping the “The Jetsons”: Episode 01 – Rosey the Robot" href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/09/recapping-the-the-jetsons-episode-01-rosey-the-robot/">Read the recap of Episode 1</a>.<br />
</em><br />
<object id="embed" width="410" height="316" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" align="middle"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="flashVars" value="mediaKey=084879a6-74e8-4db4-bea1-c05600dbde48&amp;config=wbembedplayer.xml" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="src" value="http://www.thewb.com/player/wbphasethree/wbvideoplayer.swf" /><param name="flashvars" value="mediaKey=084879a6-74e8-4db4-bea1-c05600dbde48&amp;config=wbembedplayer.xml" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="embed" width="410" height="316" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.thewb.com/player/wbphasethree/wbvideoplayer.swf" allowScriptAccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" flashVars="mediaKey=084879a6-74e8-4db4-bea1-c05600dbde48&amp;config=wbembedplayer.xml" quality="high" flashvars="mediaKey=084879a6-74e8-4db4-bea1-c05600dbde48&amp;config=wbembedplayer.xml" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" align="middle" /></object></p>
<p>The second episode of &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; aired September 30, 1962 and was titled &#8220;A Date With Jet Screamer.&#8221; Arguably the most famous of all the Jetsons episodes, it&#8217;s also certainly the most hedonistic; with sex (well, dating), drugs (cigarettes and booze), rock and roll (lotsa rock and roll) and easy living (just lousy with push buttons) dominating the story arc. This postwar version of wholesome hedonism would come to be the aspirational cliche of Americans decades later &#8212; work hard, play hard. But in Jetsonian push-button fashion, this episode aspires to drop the &#8220;work hard&#8221; part.</p>
<p><strong>Fitter, Happier, More Productive</strong></p>
<p>The problem of too much leisure time was something that some people of the 1950s and &#8217;60s were convinced was just over the horizon. Increased efficiency in postwar factories, along with the rising dominance of unions caused many to assume that we&#8217;d be working fewer and fewer hours by the 21st century. The continued maturity of the labor movement was seen as a certainty for the latter half of the 20th century and in an article from the <a href="http://www.paleofuture.com/blog/2008/1/28/how-experts-think-well-live-in-2000-ad-1950.html">Associated Press</a> in 1950, they make some predictions about labor for the next half century:</p>
<blockquote><p>There is every reason to believe that the steady growth of organized labor in the first half of 1950 will continue along the same trend in the second half of the century.</p>
<p>Labor developed to where it is today from practically nothing at the beginning of the 20th century. It’s still in the process of growth. The various elements and cliques making up the American economy – labor is just one of them – are learning more and more that the national security and well-being requires them to remain strong and work together.</p></blockquote>
<p>The article also notes that things like the minimum wage, strict child labor laws and unemployment compensation &#8212; unheard of at the turn of the 20th century &#8212; would progress much in the same trajectory as they had in first half of the 20th century. The AP article predicts that the American worker may even see a 20-hour work week by the year 2000:</p>
<blockquote><p>It’s a good bet, too, that by the end of the century many government plans now avoided as forms of socialism will be accepted as commonplace. Who in 1900 thought that by mid-century there would be government-regulated pensions and a work week limited to 40 hours? A minimum wage, child labor curbs and unemployment compensation?</p>
<p>So tell your children not to be surprised if the year 2000 finds 35 or even a 20-hour work week fixed by law.</p></blockquote>
<div id="attachment_4755" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4755" title="jetson relaxation" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/jetson-relaxation.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="423" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The Jetsons relaxing at home in the year 2062</p></div>
<p>This thinking carried on into the late 1960s, like in this <a href="http://www.paleofuture.com/blog/2009/11/4/16-hour-work-week-by-year-2020-1967.html">Associated Press</a> article from November 26, 1967. But the idea of &#8220;forced free time&#8221; didn&#8217;t sit too well with the political scientist they spoke with.</p>
<blockquote><p>Those who hunger for time off from work may take heart from the forecast of political scientist Sebastian de Grazia that the average work week, by the year 2000, will average 31 hours, and perhaps as few as 21. Twenty years later, on-the-job hours may have dwindled to 26, or even 16.</p>
<p>But what will people do with all that free time? The outlook may not be cheery.</p>
<p>As De Grazia sees it: &#8220;There is reason to fear, as some do, that free time, forced free time, will bring on the restless tick of boredom, idleness, immorality, and increased personal violence. If the cause is identified as automation and the preference for higher intelligence, nonautomated jobs may increase, but they will carry the stigma of stupidity. Men will prefer not to work rather than to accept them. Those who do accept will increasingly come to be a politically inferior class.&#8221;</p>
<p>One possible solution: a separation of income from work; perhaps a guaranteed annual wage to provide &#8220;the wherewithal for a life of leisure for all those who think they have the temperament.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Future Fix</strong></p>
<p>A scene from &#8220;Jet Screamer&#8221; that may be slightly jarring to those of us here in the year 2012 is one in which George lights up a cigarette and sips a martini. Today, there are campaigns by youth smoking prevention groups who have lobbied the MPAA in attempts to weigh smoking as a consideration for a movie&#8217;s rating (they&#8217;d like movies with smoking to get an automatic R). And some media companies have erased smoking completely from old cartoons. But when this episode aired, smoking in the U.S. was at an all-time high.</p>
<p>The adult smoking rate in the U.S. peaked in 1965 at 42.4 percent. Today the adult smoking rate in the U.S. is just 19 percent.</p>
<div id="attachment_4724" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4724" title="george smoking" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/09/george-smoking.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="421" /><p class="wp-caption-text">George Jetson enjoys a cigarette and a martini after work (1962)</p></div>
<p><strong>Postwar Amusements </strong></p>
<p>This episode, even more so than the first, seeks to project the late-1950s/early &#8217;60s vision of the American teenager into the future. Judy&#8217;s accidental success in winning a contest (despite her father&#8217;s attempts at sabotage) mean that the cool young rock star Jet Screamer takes her for a date in his flying car &#8212; to a fly-in burger joint. The burgers, cars and teens image of mid-century suburban living mirror a vision of American adolescence that some were already nostalgic for just a decade later in films like <a href="http://youtu.be/HBI0p5OGlDw"><em>American Graffiti</em></a>, a film that shows 1973&#8242;s nostalgia for 1962.</p>
<p>The 1954 book, <em>1999: Our Hopeful Future</em> by Victor Cohn projected a similar vision of teenage burger and car culture onto the reading public. But in this case it&#8217;s a slightly more unrecognizable burger for Americans in the 1950s:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Where&#8217;s Susan?&#8221; said John. &#8220;Oh, here she comes.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Hi,&#8221; said the teen-ager. &#8220;Gosh, I&#8217;m not very hungry tonight. The gang stopped at Joe&#8217;s Fly-in for plankton-burgers.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<div id="attachment_4730" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4730" title="spaceburger" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/09/spaceburger.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="421" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Jet Screamer drives Judy in his flying car to The Spaceburger drive-in (fly-in?) restaurant</p></div>
<p>In the years leading up to the Jetsons premiere in September 1962, the United States had seen an explosion in investment in the amusement park industry. Disneyland opened in Anaheim in 1955, attracting <a href="http://scholarworks.umass.edu/gradconf_hospitality/2011/Presentation/100/">3.5 million visitors</a> in its first year. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Ocean_Park">Pacific Ocean Park</a> opened in Venice, CA in 1958 with 1.2 million visitors in its first year. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleasure_Island_(Massachusetts_amusement_park)">Pleasure Island</a> opened in Massachusetts in 1959 to large crowds. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedomland_U.S.A.">Freedomland U.S.A.</a> opened in the Bronx in 1960 attracting 1.4 million visitors in its first year. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Flags_Over_Texas">Six Flags Over Texas</a> opened in 1961 with 1.2 million visitors in its first year.</p>
<p>Theme parks were of course not new in the mid-20th century, but postwar they flourished becoming ever more sophisticated with their use of electronics and higher standards of cleanliness and safety. Many of these parks served as family destinations for their respective surrounding states, but of course some like Disneyland had a national draw &#8211; which also had a national TV show that competed with &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221;!</p>
<div id="attachment_4748" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4748" title="fun pad" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/fun-pad.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="421" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The amusement park &#8220;fun pad&#8221; of the future from the second episode of The Jetsons</p></div>
<p>This postwar version of wholesome hedonism was set free in Southern California where high-end amusement parks were sprouting like gangbusters. After the success of Disneyland in 1955, other parks in the Southern California area (where the Hanna-Barbera studios and its employees were located) were built. The photo below is from the Pacific Ocean Park, opened in 1958 by CBS in Venice, California. Like many of the other parks that sprang up mid-century it didn&#8217;t have the benefit of national exposure yet worked through high operating costs. Pacific Ocean Park was shuttered after less than a decade in 1967.</p>
<div id="attachment_4777" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4777" title="1958 pacific park sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/1958-pacific-park-sm.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="651" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Neptune&#8217;s Entrance to Pacific Ocean Park circa 1958 (from the book Venice of America by Jeffrey Stanton)</p></div>
<p><strong>Eep Opp Ork Ah Ah</strong></p>
<p>The early 1960s Billboard charts were filled with the <a href="http://youtu.be/NSngzjqMF38">teenage idols</a> and crooners that clearly inspired the character of Jet Screamer. But Jet Screamer himself became a bit of a hit. The song &#8220;Eep Opp Ork Ah Ah&#8221; is undeniably catchy and is one of those that rattles around in your brain (whether you want it to or not) for days after you hear it. And because of its association with the Jetson family and all the space age optimism burned into the minds of so many kids, you see the song pop up in a number of unexpected places. If you&#8217;ve ever visited the History Center of Minnesota you&#8217;ll notice that the song is played in an exhibit about space travel. Many years later the song would be <a href="http://youtu.be/VxV9tIlpN94">covered by the Violent Femmes</a> on an album of Saturday morning cartoon songs covered by popular bands.</p>
<div id="attachment_4750" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4750" title="eep opp" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/10/eep-opp.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="424" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Screenshot from the Jetsons episode &#8220;A Date With Jet Screamer&#8221; originally aired Sept 30, 1962</p></div>
<p>The second episode of the show has fewer gadgets than the first, but its promise of easy living and constant entertainment is as emblematic of the Jetsons future as any episode in the series: the world of tomorrow will be much like today, only better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/10/recapping-the-jetsons-episode-02-a-date-with-jet-screamer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recapping &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221;: Episode 01 &#8211; Rosey the Robot</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/09/recapping-the-the-jetsons-episode-01-rosey-the-robot/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/09/recapping-the-the-jetsons-episode-01-rosey-the-robot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Novak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jetsons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1960s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=4214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meet George Jetson! The first installment of our 24-part series on the show that would forever change how we view the future]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4537" title="rosey 470x251" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/09/rosey-470x251.jpg" alt="" width="0" height="0" /></p>
<div id="attachment_4360" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4360" title="jane workout sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/09/jane-workout-sm.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="372" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Jane Jetson working out her strained fingers in the premiere episode of &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; (1962)</p></div>
<p><em>This is the first in a <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/09/50-years-of-the-jetsons-why-the-show-still-matters/">24-part series</a> looking at every episode of &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; TV show from the original 1962-63 season.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Episode 01: &#8220;Rosey the Robot,&#8221; originally aired: September 23, 1962</strong><br />
<object id="embed" width="410" height="316" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" align="middle"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="flashVars" value="mediaKey=536074a6-a743-49f2-a037-c5a422f27bac&amp;config=wbembedplayer.xml" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="src" value="http://www.thewb.com/player/wbphasethree/wbvideoplayer.swf" /><param name="flashvars" value="mediaKey=536074a6-a743-49f2-a037-c5a422f27bac&amp;config=wbembedplayer.xml" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="embed" width="410" height="316" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.thewb.com/player/wbphasethree/wbvideoplayer.swf" allowScriptAccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" flashVars="mediaKey=536074a6-a743-49f2-a037-c5a422f27bac&amp;config=wbembedplayer.xml" quality="high" flashvars="mediaKey=536074a6-a743-49f2-a037-c5a422f27bac&amp;config=wbembedplayer.xml" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" align="middle" /></object></p>
<p>If you flipped through the <em>Cedar Rapids Gazette</em> on September 23, 1962 the news looked fairly typical for the early 1960s.</p>
<p>There was a short item about a Gandhi memorial being planned in London. There was an article about overcrowded schools and the need for new junior high schools, since the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_boomer">baby boom</a> had inundated the schools and enrollment in the Cedar Rapids public school system was increasing by about 1,000 students each year.</p>
<div id="attachment_4452" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 162px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-4452" title="1962 Sept 23 Cedar Rapids Gazette tv ad sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/09/1962-Sept-23-Cedar-Rapids-Gazette-tv-ad-sm-162x300.jpg" alt="" width="162" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Newspaper ad for color TV in the September 23, 1963 Cedar Rapids Gazette</p></div>
<p>The <em>Gazette</em> also had an editorial about &#8220;lame-brain bigots&#8221; in Georgia who were burning down black churches, and a column about the fact that one out of every 38 children born in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linn_County,_Iowa">Linn County</a> in 1961 was born out of wedlock. The paper had recipes for poached eggs and peas with lemon butter sauce, as well as ads for the Smulekoff&#8217;s furniture store imploring you to buy a brand new color TV—with prices starting as low as $495 (about $3,500 adjusted for inflation).</p>
<p>But tucked away within the TV listings for that week was the mention of a show that would radically shape the way Americans would talk about the future for decades to come. The newspaper had an article about the arrival of color on ABC&#8217;s Cedar Rapids affiliate, KCRG channel 9. NBC had been &#8220;carrying the color ball almost singlehandedly&#8221; for years in Cedar Rapids but starting that evening, ABC would join the color fray with a new show called &#8220;The Jetsons.&#8221; At 6:30 pm that night &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; would debut against &#8220;Dennis the Menace&#8221; on channel 2, &#8220;Car 54 Where Are You?&#8221; on channel 6, and the season premiere of NBC&#8217;s immensely popular &#8220;Walt Disney&#8217;s Wonderful World of Color&#8221; on channels 7 and 13.</p>
<p>Of course, it wasn&#8217;t just the people of Cedar Rapids who were tuning in on Sunday to watch a middle class family stumble through modern life in the year 2062. People all over the United States got their first taste of the Jetsons&#8217; vision for tomorrow on that autumn evening.</p>
<p><strong>Push-Button Living</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s perhaps nothing more Jetsonian than the push-button. Jane Jetson pushes buttons to make dinner, to clean the home, and even to wake up her husband George. The running gag throughout the entire series is that the only thing George does all day at work (all three hours of it) is push a button.</p>
<p>From the very first scene of the first episode we learn precisely how difficult the people of the future have it. Jane Jetson is standing in front of a flat panel &#8220;3D&#8221; TV and conducting a strenuous workout &#8212; of her fingers. Of course, we&#8217;re meant to laugh at the fact that people of the year 2062 are living in the lap of luxury needing only push a button to accomplish what used to take hours, but it was also a subtle jab to those viewers at home who may complain about how difficult life is when all the modern conveniences of 1962 were at their disposal.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s important to recall that some scholars have argued that modern appliances didn&#8217;t actually save nearly as much time as originally envisioned. That&#8217;s because these gadgets impose higher standards of household efficiency and cleanliness—we take it for granted that our closets will always be filled with clean clothes; that our yards should boast perfectly maintained lawns and gardens; that our shiny kitchen appliances will make it possible to enjoy diverse and tasty meals. Many people today question this same line of thinking about technological progress, arguing that computers and smartphones have made us more productive, but that the standards for how much one person needs to accomplish have simply risen with it. Not to mention the &#8220;<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/are-we-addicted-to-gadgets-or-indentured-to-work/260265/">always available</a>&#8221; culture that our devices have cultivated.</p>
<div id="attachment_4220" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4220" title="jetsons ep01 push button" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/09/jetsons-ep01-push-button.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="208" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Two screenshots from The Jetsons showing Jane Jetson doing housework</p></div>
<p>While we often associate leisurely push-button living with the Jetsons, longtime readers of <em>Paleofuture</em> will know that this futuristic cartoon family didn&#8217;t invent the concept. In December 1950 an <a href="http://www.paleofuture.com/blog/2008/1/28/how-experts-think-well-live-in-2000-ad-1950.html">Associated Press</a> article ran in newspapers across the country that gave readers a peek at the year 2000. Experts across all kinds of fields were consulted and the article took it as a given that the American home of the future would be much more automated than it was mid-century:</p>
<blockquote><p>People will live in houses so automatic that push-buttons will be replaced by fingertip and even voice controls. Some people today can push a button to close a window – another to start coffee in the kitchen. Tomorrow such chores will be done by the warmth of your fingertip, as elevators are summoned now in some of the newest office buildings – or by a mere whisper in the intercom phone.</p></blockquote>
<p>But, as is often the case in the Jetsons&#8217; world, the gadgets of tomorrow in the premiere episode don&#8217;t always work as they were intended. Gadget malfunction is rampant and a source of financial stress in the Jetson home, recalling an article in the <em>Chicago Tribune Sunday Magazine</em> just a few years earlier.</p>
<p>Writing in the September 13, 1959 <em><a href="http://www.paleofuture.com/blog/2007/3/27/call-a-serviceman-chicago-tribune-1959.html">Chicago Tribune</a>, </em>Evelyn Zemke projects herself into the futuristic world of the year 2000. The &#8220;pizza for breakfast?&#8221; bit is nearly identical to what we see play out in the Jetson household during the premiere episode.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Call a service man,&#8221; my husband always says when one of our appliances refuses to function.</p>
<p>Sounds simple enough, doesn&#8217;t it? Well, it is. At the very worst, probably only the washer, dryer, dishwasher, and TV would give up one day. But what about the housewife of the future &#8211; say of the year 2000, when the electronic era will be at its peak?</p>
<p>I can just picture myself in her place - ready to start another care-free day sitting around reading a science fiction thriller while the gadgets do all the work. Already the electronic brain in my kitchen is busy preparing and serving breakfast.</p>
<p>My husband, arriving at the table exclaims, &#8220;Pizza? For breakfast?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I pushed the button labeled BACON AND EGGS, but-&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s a wire crossed somewhere. Call a service man.&#8221;</p>
<p>After doing so, I dispose of the garbage in the electronic disposal unit and pile the dishes in the ultra-sonic dishwasher. Then, after pushing the button which starts the electronic vacuum cleaner, I go out to the garage to set the timer for our radar controled lawnmower.</p>
<p>&#8220;Ki-yi-yi!&#8221; Sounds like Fifi, our pet poodle.</p>
<p>My daughter, standing in the doorway, calls, &#8220;Mom! The cleaner is vacuuming Fifi!&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<div id="attachment_4525" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4525" title="judy and jane" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/09/judy-and-jane.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="414" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Judy and her mother Jane Jetson in their home in the premiere episode &#8220;Rosey the Robot&#8221;</p></div>
<p><strong>Baby Boom</strong></p>
<p>The premiere episode also shows viewers an interaction with Jane and her daughter Judy that hints at what would later be called the <a href="http://discussions.mnhs.org/covering1968/2009/12/15/the-generation-gap-life-may-17-1968/">generation gap</a>. Many of the same fears parents have here in the 21st century about their kids &#8220;growing up too fast&#8221; were splashed across popular media of the 1960s. The August 10, 1962 issue of <em>Life</em> magazine ran the story &#8220;Boys and Girls Too Old Too Soon: America&#8217;s Subteens Rushing Toward Trouble.&#8221; The story included a provocative photo essay showing 12 and 13-year-olds going on dates and engaging in &#8220;heavy necking.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the 1950s and &#8217;60s the teenager and &#8220;subteens&#8221; (what we today might call a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tween_(demographic)">tween</a>) became a force to be reckoned with. There was suddenly a group of kids larger than any American generation that had come before it, and this had a dramatic ripple effect throughout our society. In Cedar Rapids, Iowa &#8212; like hundreds of other communities across the U.S. &#8212; that meant building more schools. And for the burgeoning medium of television, that meant delivering storylines which sometimes reflected the growing pains of what was held up as the model American family.</p>
<p><strong>Slidewalks of Tomorrow</strong></p>
<p>As we looked at this past January, the idea of <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/01/moving-sidewalks-before-the-jetsons/">abundant moving sidewalks</a> in the city of tomorrow predates <em>The Jetsons</em> by over half a century. But some of the more interesting mid-century examples, which likely influenced <em>The Jetsons,</em> came from TV and Sunday comic strips. The Disneyland TV episode &#8220;Magic Highway, U.S.A.,&#8221; which aired on May 14, 1958 looks like it may have inspired the Jetsons&#8217; slidewalks of the future. The show also likely drew inspiration from print media, like the Sunday comic strip &#8220;Closer Than We Think,&#8221; which you can see below.</p>
<div id="attachment_4255" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4255" title="moving sidwealk" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/09/moving-sidwealk.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="415" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Jane Jetson on a moving sidewalk in the premiere episode of The Jetsons</p></div>
<div id="attachment_4263" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4263" title="magic highway sidewalk" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/09/magic-highway-sidewalk.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="425" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Moving sidewalk of the future in the 1958 Disneyland TV episode &#8220;Magic Highway USA&#8221;</p></div>
<p>The June 7, 1959 edition of Arthur Radebaugh&#8217;s Sunday comic strip &#8220;Closer Than We Think&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p>The large malls planned for tomorrow’s metropolitan centers will not be tied up with vehicular traffic. Shoppers and sight-seers will be transported by mobile sidewalks that closely resemble giant conveyer belts. Parcels to be delivered will be carried by overhead rail to trucks on the area’s perimeter.</p></blockquote>
<div id="attachment_4266" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4266" title="1959 June 7 moving sidewalks sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/09/1959-June-7-moving-sidewalks-sm.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="317" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Moving sidewalk in the June 7, 1959 comic &#8220;Closer Than We Think&#8221;</p></div>
<p><strong>Hello Rosey</strong></p>
<p>An interesting detail that&#8217;s established in the first episode, but isn&#8217;t necessarily carried throughout the series, is that the robot maid of the year 2062 is considered a luxury item. One of the reasons that Jane buys Rosey instead of the more &#8220;distinguished&#8221; robots (shown as distinguished by simply having British and French accents) is that the Jetsons simply can&#8217;t afford anything more expensive.</p>
<p>Rosey the robot maid is perhaps the most iconic futuristic character to ever grace the small screen. Rosey is high-tech, but she&#8217;s also fallible. The mere fact that I use &#8220;she&#8221; rather than &#8220;it&#8221; speaks to what she represented &#8212; the humanoid robot helpers of our future, imperfect as they may be. And strangely, she doesn&#8217;t play a very prominent role in the first season of &#8220;The Jetsons.&#8221; The premiere episode establishes that Rosey is a valued member of the Jetson family, but as you&#8217;ll see over the course of this blog series, she doesn&#8217;t get a lot of screen time. Perhaps because she was so beloved by kids who saw her on reruns during the 1960s, &#8217;70s and early &#8217;80s she receives a much more prominent role in the 1985 reboot.</p>
<div id="attachment_4539" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4539" title="rosey space bus" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/09/rosey-space-bus.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="417" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Rosey the robot maid waits for the Space Bus in this screenshot from &#8220;Rosey the Robot&#8221;</p></div>
<p>If you own the first season DVDs or watch it online you may notice that the first season has title cards which include Orbitty, a character that wasn&#8217;t introduced until the 1980s reboot. Knowing that the episode title slates on my DVD copy of &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; were from the 1980s, I went down to the <a href="http://www.paleycenter.org/">Paley Center for Media</a> in Beverly Hills a few months back to see if I could find any clues about the true spelling of &#8220;Rosey.&#8221; As I mentioned last week, there has been some confusion about the proper way to spell the name. The Paley Center has an enormous collection of old TV and radio programs and sure enough, they have a copy of the first episode of &#8220;The Jetsons.&#8221; I was a little surprised to learn that the first season wasn&#8217;t aired with individual title slates, but I found some vindication in my spelling of &#8220;Rosey&#8221; in a 1962 board game that was on display.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4354" title="rosey title slate sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/09/rosey-title-slate-sm.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="419" /></p>
<div id="attachment_4502" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4502" title="rosey the robot game" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/09/rosey-the-robot-game.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="293" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Jetsons board game released in 1962 (cameraphone photo taken at Paley Center for Media in Los Angeles)</p></div>
<p><strong>Reception</strong></p>
<p>Reviews of  <em>The Jetsons</em> were generally positive on the day following its premiere, with Rick Du Brow from the UPI calling the show a &#8220;genial time killer.&#8221; But as we looked at <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/09/50-years-of-the-jetsons-why-the-show-still-matters/">last week</a>, the show suffered from a tough time slot (in most markets it was up against the established powerhouse that was &#8220;Walt Disney&#8217;s Wonderful World of Color&#8221;) and a relative blandness when viewed in black and white, as most Americans did in 1962.</p>
<p>The <em>Cedar Rapids Gazette</em>&#8216;s article about the new influx of color TV programming in Cedar Rapids proclaimed that &#8220;this year should be a coming-up-roses year for those who believe that television minus color is like the sky without blue.&#8221; Writer Nadine Subtonik acknowledged that it was still expensive but that if kids hound their parents enough &#8220;making Mom and Dad&#8217;s life miserable&#8221; then widespread color TV adoption was a certainty in the near future. But how many color sets were in the Cedar Rapids area at the time? &#8220;A quick survey the other morning convinced me of only one thing: Nobody has the faintest idea!&#8221;</p>
<p>There are a number of different technologies and subtleties within the Jetsons world that I didn&#8217;t touch on in this post, but just know that this was by design. While writing this post I came to realize that if I try to reference every gadget or social anachronism I&#8217;ll wind up with 24 novel-length posts and nobody wants to read that. We have 23 more of these to go, so please be patient if I missed your favorite doodad or whatsit. We&#8217;ll likely get to it in a future post. And thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/09/recapping-the-the-jetsons-episode-01-rosey-the-robot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>50 Years of the Jetsons: Why The Show Still Matters</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/09/50-years-of-the-jetsons-why-the-show-still-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/09/50-years-of-the-jetsons-why-the-show-still-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Novak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Around the Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flying Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jetpacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jetsons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Disney Universe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/?p=2436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although it was on the air for only one season, The Jetsons remains our most popular point of reference when discussing the future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4326" title="jetsons 470x251" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/09/jetsons-470x251.jpg" alt="" width="0" height="0" /></p>
<div id="attachment_2641" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2641" title="jetsons title slate sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/05/jetsons-title-slate-sm.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="422" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The Jetsons title slate from 1962</p></div>
<p>It was 50 years ago this coming Sunday that the Jetson family first jetpacked their way into American homes. The show lasted just one season (24 episodes) after its debut on Sunday September 23, 1962, but today &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; stands as the single most important piece of 20th century futurism. More episodes were later produced in the mid-1980s, but it&#8217;s that 24-episode first season that helped define the future for so many Americans today.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy for some people to dismiss &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; as just a TV show, and a lowly cartoon at that. But this little show—for better and for worse—has had a profound impact on the way that Americans think and talk about the future. And it&#8217;s for this reason that, starting this Friday, I&#8217;ll begin to explore the world of &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; one episode at a time. Each week I&#8217;ll look at a new episode from the original 1962-63 series, beginning with the premiere episode, &#8220;<a href="http://www.thewb.com/shows/the-jetsons/rosey-the-robot/536074a6-a743-49f2-a037-c5a422f27bac">Rosey the Robot.</a>&#8221;</p>
<p><a title="Recapping the “The Jetsons”: Episode 01 – Rosey the Robot" href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/09/recapping-the-the-jetsons-episode-01-rosey-the-robot/"><strong>Read my recap of Episode 1 here!</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>Futures Redux</strong></p>
<p>Five decades after its debut, not a day goes by that someone isn&#8217;t using &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; as a way to talk about the fantastic technological advancements we&#8217;re seeing today. Or conversely, evidence of so many futuristic promises that remain unfulfilled. Just look at a handful of news stories from the past few days:</p>
<ul class="indent">
<li>In <a href="http://www.examiner.com/article/out-of-this-world-fashion-markus-lupfer-2013-spring-rtw-collection">fashion</a>. (&#8220;Who better than the Jetsons to be inspired by for an out of space theme?&#8221;)</li>
<li>Johnny Depp talks about the West Memphis Three emerging from prison <a href="http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1693940/johnny-depp-west-of-memphis.jhtml">after nearly two decades</a>. ( &#8221;By the time you came out, it&#8217;s &#8216;The Jetsons.&#8217; It&#8217;s a whole &#8216;nother world.&#8221;)</li>
<li>James Cameron talks about <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/story/2012/09/14/an-arms-race-in-visual-experience/57779382/1">the future of interactive movies</a>. (&#8220;There might be a certain amount of interactivity, so when you look around, it creates that image wherever you look,&#8221; Cameron says. He concedes it is far off: &#8220;You&#8217;re talking &#8216;Jetsons&#8217; here.&#8221;)</li>
<li>The future of cars, as depicted at the <a href="http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-news/los-angeles-auto-show-design-challenge-takes-a-turn-to-law-enforcement-ar134733.html">Los Angeles Auto Show</a>. (&#8220;Considering that 2025 is only 13 years away, you would think that nobody’s going to go &#8216;Jetsons&#8217; with their presentation, but the LAASDC doesn’t roll like that.&#8221;)</li>
<li>The sound of <a href="http://www.sfbg.com/noise/2012/09/13/snap-sounds-laetitia-sadier">kitschy futurism</a> in modern music. (&#8220;Silencio allows Sadier&#8217;s various musical influences to breathe and linger, without being upstaged by the motorik propulsion, and &#8216;Jetsons&#8217; kitsch, of the Stereolab formula.&#8221;)</li>
</ul>
<p>Thanks to my <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Alerts">Google Alerts</a> for words and phrases like Jetsons, <em>Minority Report</em>, utopia, dystopia, <em>Blade Runner</em>, <em>Star Trek</em>, apocalypse and a host of others, I&#8217;ve been monitoring the way that we talk about the future for years. And no point of reference has been more popular and varied as a symbol of tomorrowism than &#8220;The Jetsons.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Golden Age of Futurism</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; was the distillation of every Space Age promise Americans could muster. People point to &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; as the golden age of American futurism because (technologically, at least) it had everything our hearts could desire: <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/02/the-super-bowls-love-affair-with-jetpacks/">jetpacks</a>, <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/06/1923-envisions-the-two-wheeled-flying-car-of-1973/">flying cars</a>, <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/04/the-disco-blasting-robot-waiters-of-1980s-pasadena/">robot maids</a>, <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/01/moving-sidewalks-before-the-jetsons/">moving sidewalks</a>. But the creators of &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; weren&#8217;t the first to dream up these futuristic inventions. Virtually nothing presented in the show was a new idea in 1962, but what &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; did do successfully was condense and package those inventions into entertaining 25-minute blocks for impressionable, media-hungry kids to consume.</p>
<p>And though it was &#8220;just a cartoon&#8221; with all the sight gags and parody you&#8217;d expect, it was based on very real expectations for the future. As author Danny Graydon notes in <a href="http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Jetsons.html?id=ycpccAAACAAJ"><em>The Jetsons: The Official Cartoon Guide</em></a>, the artists drew inspiration from futurist books of the time, including the 1962 book <em><a href="http://www.paleofuture.com/blog/2010/10/16/1975-and-the-changes-to-come-1962.html">1975: And the Changes to Come</a>,</em> by Arnold B. Barach (who envisioned such breakthroughs as ultrasonic dishwashers and instant language translators). The designers also drew heavily from the <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/06/googie-architecture-of-the-space-age/">Googie</a> aesthetic of southern California (where the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanna-Barbera">Hanna-Barbera</a> studios were located)—a style that perhaps best represented postwar consumer culture promises of freedom and modernity.</p>
<p>The years leading up to &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; premiere in September 1962 were a mix of techo-utopianism and Cold War fears. The launch of Sputnik by the Soviets in 1957 created great anxiety in an American public that already had been whipped up into a frenzy about the Communist threat. In February 1962 John Glenn became the first American to orbit the Earth, but less than a year earlier the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion">Bay of Pigs</a> fiasco raised tensions between the superpowers to a dangerous level. Americans seemed equally optimistic and terrified for the future.</p>
<p>I spoke over the phone with Danny Graydon, the London-based author of the official guide to &#8220;The Jetsons<em>.&#8221; </em>Graydon explained why he believed the show resonated with so many Americans in 1962: &#8220;It coincided with this period of American history when there was a renewed hope &#8212; the beginning of the &#8217;60s, sort of pre-Vietnam [protests], when Kennedy was in power. So there was something very attractive about the nuclear family with good honest values thriving well into the future. I think that chimed with the zeitgeist of the American culture of the time.&#8221;</p>
<div id="attachment_4291" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-4291" title="early jetsons sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/09/early-jetsons-sm.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="510" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Early character sketch of the Jetson family from the Official Guide to the Jetsons by Danny Graydon</p></div>
<p><strong>Where&#8217;s My Jetpack?</strong></p>
<p>As Graydon points out, &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; was a projection of the model American family into the future. The world of &#8221;The Jetsons&#8221; showed people with very few concerns about disrupting the status quo politically or socially, but instead showed a technologically advanced culture where the largest concern of the middle class was getting &#8220;push-button finger.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s important to remember that today&#8217;s political, social and business leaders were pretty much watching &#8221;The Jetsons&#8221; on repeat during their most impressionable years. People are often shocked to learn that &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; lasted just one season during its original run in 1962-63 and wasn&#8217;t revived until 1985. Essentially every kid in America (and many internationally) saw the series on constant repeat during Saturday morning cartoons throughout the 1960s, &#8217;70s and &#8217;80s. Everyone (including my own mom) seems to ask me, &#8220;How could it have been around for only 24 episodes? Did I really just watch those same episodes over and over again?&#8221; Yes, yes you did.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s just a cartoon, right? So what if today&#8217;s political and social elite saw &#8221;The Jetsons&#8221; a lot? Thanks in large part to the Jetsons, there&#8217;s a sense of betrayal that is pervasive in American culture today about the future that never arrived. We&#8217;re all familiar with the rallying cries of the angry retrofuturist: Where&#8217;s my jetpack!?! Where&#8217;s my flying car!?! Where&#8217;s my robot maid?!? &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; and everything they represented were seen by so many not as a possible future, but a promise of one.</p>
<p>This nostalgia for the futurism of yesteryear has very real consequences for the way that we talk about ourselves as a nation. So many people today talk about how divided we are as a country and that we no longer dream &#8220;like we used to.&#8221; But when we look at things like public approval of the Apollo space program in the 1960s, those myths of national unity begin to dissolve. Public approval of funding for the Apollo program <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2012/05/space_program_s_future_and_landing_on_the_moon_how_nostalgia_for_the_apollo_program_doesn_t_help_.html">peaked at 53 percent</a> (around the first moon landing) but pretty much hovered between 35-45 percent for most of the 1960s. Why is there a misconception today about Americans being more supportive of the space program? Because an enormous generation called Baby Boomers were kids in the 1960s; kids playing astronaut and watching shows like <em></em>&#8220;The Jetsons&#8221;; kids who were bombarded with images of a bright, shiny future and for whom the world was much simpler because they saw everything through the eyes of a child.</p>
<p><strong>Why Only One Season?</strong></p>
<p>If &#8221;The Jetsons&#8221; is so important and resonated with so many viewers, then why was the show canceled after just one season (though it was revived in the 1980s)? I&#8217;ve spoken to a number of different people about this, but I haven&#8217;t heard anyone mention what I believe to be the most likely reason that <em></em>&#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; wasn&#8217;t renewed for a second season: color. Or, more accurately, a lack of color. &#8221;The Jetsons&#8221; was produced and broadcast in color, but in 1962 less than 3 percent of American households had a color television set. In fact, it wasn&#8217;t until 1972 that 50 percent of American households had a color TV.</p>
<p>The Jetsons&#8217; future is bright; it&#8217;s shiny; and it&#8217;s in color. But most people watching on Sunday nights obviously didn&#8217;t see it like that. The immersive world of <em></em>&#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; looks far more flat and unengaging in black and white. And unlike the other network shows it was up against on Sunday nights (which was in most markets &#8220;Walt Disney&#8217;s Wonderful World of Color&#8221; on NBC and &#8220;Car 54 Where Are You?&#8221; on CBS) &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; suffered disproportionately more from being viewed in black and white.</p>
<p>NBC also had an incumbent advantage. If you&#8217;d made <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walt_Disney_anthology_television_series#1960s_and_1970s">&#8220;Walt Disney&#8217;s Wonderful of Color</a>&#8221; appointment viewing for the past year (Disney jumped ship from ABC to NBC in 1961 where they not only began broadcasting in color, but added &#8220;color&#8221;  to the name) it&#8217;s unlikely you&#8217;d switch your family over to an unknown cartoon entity.<em> </em>&#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; was the first show ever broadcast in color on ABC, but it was still up to individual affiliates as to whether the show would be broadcast in color. According to the September 23, 1962 <em>New York Times</em> only people with access to ABC&#8217;s owned-and-operated stations in New York, Chicago, Detroit, San Francisco and Los Angeles were guaranteed to see the show broadcast in color—provided you owned a color set.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve takens some screenshots from the DVD release of the first season to show just how dramatic a difference color can make with a show like this.</p>
<div id="attachment_2637" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2637" title="opening shot jetsons comparison sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/05/opening-shot-jetsons-comparison-sm.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="205" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Establishing shot from the Jetsons (&#8220;Rosey the Robot&#8221; September 23, 1962)</p></div>
<div id="attachment_2632" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2632" title="jetsons flamoongo sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/05/jetsons-flamoongo-sm.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="210" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Black and white versus color comparison of the Jetsons (&#8220;Las Venus&#8221; December 16, 1962)</p></div>
<div id="attachment_2635" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 550px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2635" title="jetsons tralfaz mansion sm" src="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/files/2012/05/jetsons-tralfaz-mansion-sm.jpeg" alt="" width="550" height="211" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Screenshots from &#8220;Millionaire Astro&#8221; originally aired January 6, 1963</p></div>
<p>There&#8217;s also this <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhuOpRhhn2I">promo from 1962</a>, which gives us a taste of what &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; looked like devoid of color. It&#8217;s bizarre for those of us who grew up on &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; to see their fantastical world reduced to black and white:</p>
<p><object width="575" height="431" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zhuOpRhhn2I?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed width="575" height="431" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zhuOpRhhn2I?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" allowFullScreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" /></object></p>
<p><strong>The What-Ifs</strong></p>
<p>There are a lot of &#8220;what-ifs&#8221; in &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; universe that may have had substantial bearing on politicians, policymakers and the average American today. If we accept that media has an influence on the way that we view culture, and our own place in the future—as &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; seems to ask us to do—we have to ask ourselves how our expectations might have changed with subtle tweaks to the Jetson story. What if George took a flying bus or monorail instead of a flying car? What if Jane Jetson worked outside of the home? What if the show had a single African-American character? These questions are impossible to answer, of course, but they&#8217;re important to recall as we examine this show that so dramatically shaped our understanding of tomorrow.</p>
<p><strong>1985 and Beyond</strong></p>
<p>Obviously the 1985-87 reboot of <em></em>&#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; TV show played an important role in carrying the futuristic toon torch, but it&#8217;s in many ways an entirely different animal. The animation simply has a different feel and the storylines are arguably weaker, though I certainly remember watching them along with the original reruns when I was a kid in the 1980s. There were also movies produced—1990&#8242;s <em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jetsons:_The_Movie">The Jetsons</a></em> was released theatrically and the made-for-TV movie crossover <em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Jetsons_Meet_the_Flintstones">The Jetsons Meet the Flintstones</a></em> first aired in 1987. But for our purposes, we&#8217;ll just be exploring the first season and its immediate influence during the American Space Age. With talk of a live-action Jetsons movie in the works, it will be interesting to see how a revamped Jetsons might play today.</p>
<p>A few style notes that I&#8217;ll get out of the way:</p>
<ul class="indent">
<li>I spell Rosey the way it appeared in merchandise of the 1960s. Yes, you&#8217;ll sometimes see it spelled &#8220;Rosie&#8221; in video games and comics of the 1980s, but since our focus is the first season I&#8217;m sticking with Rosey.</li>
<li>The show never mentions &#8220;within world&#8221; what year the Jetson family is living, but for our purposes we&#8217;ll assume it to be 2062. Press materials and newspapers of 1962 mention this year, even though the characters only ever say &#8220;21st century&#8221; during the first season of the show.</li>
<li>Orbitty is from the 1980s reboot of <em>The Jetsons</em>. Orbitty, a pet alien, is essentially the Jar-Jar Binks of the Jetsons&#8217; world and you probably won&#8217;t see me mention him again.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Meet George Jetson</strong></p>
<p><em>The Jetsons</em>, of course, represents a nostalgia for the future; but perhaps more oddly, it still represents the future to so many people who grew up with it. I&#8217;m excited to get started on this project and welcome your comments throughout this process, especially if you have vivid memories of the show from when you were a kid. I know I certainly do &#8212; I turned it into my career!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Update: The first paragraph of this post was revised to clarify that more episodes of &#8220;The Jetsons&#8221; were produced in the 1980s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/2012/09/50-years-of-the-jetsons-why-the-show-still-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
