Comments on: Lincoln vs. Darwin (Part 1 of 4)

By: Who Was More Important? Abraham Lincoln vs. Charles Darwin (Part 4 of 4) | Surprising Science

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:45:27 +0000

[...] Smithsonian magazine have been debating who was more important, Abraham Lincoln or Charles Darwin. T.A. Frail and Mark Strauss argued for Lincoln and Laura Helmuth for Darwin. And now it’s my [...]

By: Who Was More Important? Abraham Lincoln vs. Charles Darwin (Part 3 of 4) | Surprising Science

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:52:26 +0000

[...] week we asked: Who was more important, Abraham Lincoln or Charles Darwin? T.A. Frail took up the fight for Lincoln, and Laura Helmuth argued for Darwin. Today, senior editor Mark Strauss, the grand organizer of all [...]

By: Who Was More Important? Lincoln or Darwin, Part 2 | Surprising Science

Who Was More Important? Lincoln or Darwin, Part 2 | Surprising Science — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:30:39 +0000

[...] asked: Who was more important, Abraham Lincoln or Charles Darwin? Yesterday, senior editor T.A. Frail took up the fight for Lincoln. Today, our blog overseer, senior editor Laura Helmuth, argues for [...]