<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: The State of the Planet&#8217;s Oceans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/03/16/review-the-state-of-the-planets-oceans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/03/16/review-the-state-of-the-planets-oceans/</link>
	<description>Ideas, innovations and discoveries from the world of science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:04:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Female Scientists Aren't THAT Rare &#124; Surprising Science</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/03/16/review-the-state-of-the-planets-oceans/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Female Scientists Aren't THAT Rare &#124; Surprising Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=894#comment-327</guid>
		<description>[...] of the problem. Not only are women still rare at the top of the science world, but they are even more uncommon in the public eye. It doesn’t mean that there aren’t smart women doing great science—you just have to look a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the problem. Not only are women still rare at the top of the science world, but they are even more uncommon in the public eye. It doesn’t mean that there aren’t smart women doing great science—you just have to look a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
