<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creationists Visit the Natural History Museum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/03/creationists-visit-the-natural-history-museum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/03/creationists-visit-the-natural-history-museum/</link>
	<description>Ideas, innovations and discoveries from the world of science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:31:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/03/creationists-visit-the-natural-history-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-4418</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 17:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=870#comment-4418</guid>
		<description>Creation and science are not mutually exclusive and, in fact, many biologists and natural scientists are Christians, Jews, or other believers in a God-inspired creation. I am not sure that this was an appropriate article for a writer of a magazine of an institution of such prestige. You essentially eschewed all who have faith in God&#039;s brilliant use of science, which according to statistics, is nearly 50% of the country--and includes nearly all minorities (African American and Hispanic). Perhaps, from a marketing stand point, the museum should include acknowledgement of other points of view, and should certainly not publish posts like this one. My two creation believing minority sons will attend your museum today--and by the way--they love dinosaurs.

Sincerely,
Pat, Ph.D. Candidate
Creation Believer and Intellectual Who Values Science</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creation and science are not mutually exclusive and, in fact, many biologists and natural scientists are Christians, Jews, or other believers in a God-inspired creation. I am not sure that this was an appropriate article for a writer of a magazine of an institution of such prestige. You essentially eschewed all who have faith in God&#8217;s brilliant use of science, which according to statistics, is nearly 50% of the country&#8211;and includes nearly all minorities (African American and Hispanic). Perhaps, from a marketing stand point, the museum should include acknowledgement of other points of view, and should certainly not publish posts like this one. My two creation believing minority sons will attend your museum today&#8211;and by the way&#8211;they love dinosaurs.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Pat, Ph.D. Candidate<br />
Creation Believer and Intellectual Who Values Science</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freem</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/03/creationists-visit-the-natural-history-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>Freem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=870#comment-552</guid>
		<description>Joe you&#039;re such a kidder! I agree with you, the Smith needs to put saddles on the dino&#039;s and admit that they are less than 6000 years old! Woot! Thanks for the courage of your convictions and the arrogance of your ignorance!

May he touch you with his noodly appendage, Ramen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe you&#8217;re such a kidder! I agree with you, the Smith needs to put saddles on the dino&#8217;s and admit that they are less than 6000 years old! Woot! Thanks for the courage of your convictions and the arrogance of your ignorance!</p>
<p>May he touch you with his noodly appendage, Ramen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/03/creationists-visit-the-natural-history-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=870#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Science fiction movies are not proof of extraterrestrial life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Science fiction movies are not proof of extraterrestrial life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/03/creationists-visit-the-natural-history-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=870#comment-292</guid>
		<description>I know I always get a good chuckle when viewing evolution &quot;proofs&quot;. Honestly I&#039;ve seen just as much proof for the existence of extra terrestrials, why doesn’t the Smithsonian have any of them on display?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I always get a good chuckle when viewing evolution &#8220;proofs&#8221;. Honestly I&#8217;ve seen just as much proof for the existence of extra terrestrials, why doesn’t the Smithsonian have any of them on display?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
